The most immediate response is this simple fact:
Milking franchises or not, none of that matters one IOTA unless the games themselves are bad. And in Nintendo's case, almost no one can make a good case that Nintendo's recent "milkings" are lacking in greatness. Sure, whiners out there complain about Mario Sunshine and whatever else, but this gamer right here thinks Nintendo is making the best possible use of their franchises, as seen with the final product.
The worst part? This goes both ways--if Nintendo didn't make sequels, they would be chastised for ignoring lucrative opportunities. Furthermore, the wait between there biggest games has at times been nearly interminable. Now maybe I should go read this article...hahaha...
While this article has much truth within it, and it makes a few interesting points, the writer is actually missing the major point: just because HE is done with Nintendo (and still doesn't QUITE admit it), doesn't mean that Nintendo is flawed or that their terrific first party titles like Mario Sunshine and Wind Waker aren't so terrific. I felt and still feel that Mario Sunshine met my expectations, for the most part--at times I wanted more presentation and a grand fanfare at Mario's RETURN, but in the end, Miyamoto and Co. just wanted you to play the game, get right to it. I'm okay with that.
The advance word on The Wind Waker tells me that Nintendo is ABSOLUTELY JUSTIFYING every day their reason for making sequels. Great games tend to do that.
Furthermore, this guy basically says he's seeing history repeat itself with the GCN going the way of the N64, and THIS IS BOLD-FACED EXAGGERATION. Everyone who's paying attention knows that Nintendo has improved ten-fold when it comes to producing games for their current system, and it already has far more games, to my knowledge, than the N64 had at this point. That little knock about "Nintendo 65" was not well taken.
Good points or no, this article was in fact not a BIASED article, but another example of an older gamer whose outgrown Nintendo. Simple as that.
Many of us still haven't outgrown them, and if you ask me, we're better off.
Edit: To add insult to injury, look what Jeff lists as his most wanted....this is great:
"...Most Wanted: A good Sin & Punishment sequel, some stuff we can't reveal yet..."
On top of that, he's "currently playing" Zelda: The Wind Waker. A sequel, if you didn't know
Now, I realize Jeff isn't saying that all sequels are bad, but he
a) undervalues what Nintendo DOES with their sequels and
b) undervalues or ignores Nintendo's new franchises and (as others here have since noted before me)
c) undervalues the idea that one can't know everything, and Nintendo's probably only begun to really get moving with the GameCube. I think that's safe to say. A little over one year into a system's life is JACK SQUAT, people. Look at the PS2's first year and look where it is now.