Already noticed at least one outlet giving the new versions a higher score despite calling them (essentially) weak ports that remove content. I guess reviewers and "real gamers" are just so entrenched with their controllers of choice that not having to hold the gamepad makes all the difference to them?
Also interested to see how often the word "gimmick" is used in reviews when they refer to the Wii U release. (To be fair, using the word is probably fair... I'm just curious to see how strongly it's emphasized.)
Personally, I don't see it being any less valid to give a game a higher score because it plays well with your controller of choice than to give a game a higher score because it kinda sorta gave people the impression the Wii U GamePad wasn't a worthless, expensive gimmick.
Personally, I'm just amused that 3 years later, we still don't have a game where people can say you "have" to play it with the GamePad. So far, every game that's come out has played just as well or better with a standard controller (or, in the case of Rayman Legends, on a handheld).