A little prudent editing might have let me read the whole thing (THREE pages, wow:P: ). Still, what I did read was interesting and fun. I'd disagree with formatting this differently, as was suggested... It'd lose its informal nature and some of its charm.
Anyways, I happen to believe C-Sticking has its place in the game. I do "real" smashes for most of my attacks, but every so often, I'll see an opening that's fitting, and flip the c-stick. I'm not even certain of the cases for a c-stick smash, as it's kind of second nature by now, but it's another tool in my arsenal to use should the opportunity arise. See, it's ok that it's easier to pull off because there's a penalty associated with c-sticking: they're not as powerful as "real" smashes!
In that sense, people who can incorporate both sorts of smashes are, to me, playing a more-finely tuned match, more cerebral game. They have more weapons at their disposal, and must decide on the fly which to unsheath and strike with. It's more complicated, and gives the player a better, more complete range of attacks.
Maybe you should give the C-stick smash a more personal evaluation before you judge against it, Mike. You might just find a place for it in your Smash arsenal.