Author Topic: Wiik NOA  (Read 2353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ThePerm

  • predicted it first.
  • Score: 64
    • View Profile
Wiik NOA
« on: April 28, 2006, 10:21:19 PM »
In my opinion ever since Howard Lincoln and Minoru Arakawa left NOA things have really gone downhill for Nintendo of America. Now Nintendo is primarily a Japanese company, but as a worldwide company it SHOULD divide its power internationally. It is better business sense to do so.

lets look at the n64 era, sure there were no cds, but

Goldeneye, Banjo Kazooie, Turok series Exclusive, Rare was with the company, they were signing companies like Silicon Knights. Things were very good.

now it seems as though NOA is nothing more than a marketer and distributer, filled with nothing but YES-People and has no backbone of its own.

Why was Splinter Cell not exclusive? Prince of Persia? Why didn't they make bungie who they are? Why are Rare and SK gone?

The gamecube was filled with lots of exclusives, why is it that they sold poorly?

I remember the numbers of sales on n64, most games sold several millions and that was great. I was always like. Well when they switched to cds they will be so much more profitable. Well it didnt happen. THey stayed the same amount of profit(still more profitable then Sony). When in fact had they sold the same sales with the same profit they would have met inflation.

NWR has permission to use any tentative mockup/artwork I post

Offline Hostile Creation

  • Hydra-Wata
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Wiik NOA
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2006, 10:25:03 PM »
"The gamecube was filled with lots of exclusives, why is it that they sold poorly?"

What exclusives have sold poorly on Gamecube?
(What exclusives were on Gamecube lololol)
HC: Honourary Aussie<BR>Originally posted by: ThePerm<BR>
YOUR IWATA AVATAR LOOKS LIKE A REAL HOSTILE CREATION!!!!!<BR><BR>only someone with leoperd print sheets could produce such an image!!!<BR>

Offline Bloodworth

  • Phantom
  • *
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Wiik NOA
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2006, 10:32:52 PM »
Rare is gone because they suck and they were a money pit.
Daniel Bloodworth
Managing Editor
GameTrailers

Offline Dasmos

  • Needs Him Some Tang in His Lollies
  • Score: 52
    • View Profile
RE:Wiik NOA
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2006, 10:37:20 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: ThePerm
Why was Splinter Cell not exclusive? Prince of Persia? Why didn't they make bungie who they are?
Who decides all this? Is it purely Nintendo? Is it Nintendo's choice whether they were offered series exclusivity? No.

Are you seriusly trying to blame Nintendo for what other companies do? Daaymn dawg.
Quote

Why are Rare and SK gone?
Tell me, what have Rare done? SK? Nothing. From the Rare deal Nintendo got Retro instead. Which would you rather?
Images are not allowed in signatures. That includes moving images (video).

Offline eljefe

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Wiik NOA
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2006, 10:39:19 PM »
This is the "problem" Ian (and apparently others) have with Nintendo.

If YOU personally had fun with the GC, does anything else REALLY matter?

Enjoy it, and spread the joy, and MABYE other people you know will buy it. That's what I'm gonna do with the Wii.




I understand some people will always speculate and worry, that is human nature (especially bored-on-the-internet humans). Seriously tho, NINTENDO WILL BE FINE.

THEY ARE NOT LITTLE KIDS WHO NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT. THEY WILL ACHEIVE SUCCESS OR FAILURE WITHOUT YOUR HELP. You can't change 'em or control 'em.

Go with the flow. ..
..:    I just noticed WTF is FTW backwords. Sometimes when you think things are going bad, they suddenly turn around. Much like this thread. For the win.  :.   MJRx9000

Offline Ian Sane

  • Champion for Urban Champion
  • Score: 1
    • View Profile
RE: Wiik NOA
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2006, 07:21:11 AM »
"If YOU personally had fun with the GC, does anything else REALLY matter?"

Less sales means less market share which means less third party support which means less satisfaction on my part.

Offline trip1eX

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Wiik NOA
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2006, 09:30:53 AM »
Ian's new sig.

Always hatin'.  Never Happy. 24/7.

Offline ThePerm

  • predicted it first.
  • Score: 64
    • View Profile
RE:Wiik NOA
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2006, 09:37:26 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Dasmos
Quote

Originally posted by: ThePerm
Why was Splinter Cell not exclusive? Prince of Persia? Why didn't they make bungie who they are?
Who decides all this? Is it purely Nintendo? Is it Nintendo's choice whether they were offered series exclusivity? No.

Are you seriusly trying to blame Nintendo for what other companies do? Daaymn dawg.
Quote

Why are Rare and SK gone?
Tell me, what have Rare done? SK? Nothing. From the Rare deal Nintendo got Retro instead. Which would you rather?


who decides it? Nintendo's money.


Nintendo is a corperation, the executives are getting nice pay checks, but they are not getting all the money. The money just gets saved up and never used. If Nintendo just spent a billion one year on marketing. They would become so saturated that they could have the costs of everything.
NWR has permission to use any tentative mockup/artwork I post

Offline Smash_Brother

  • Let me show you my poké-balls
  • Score: 3
    • View Profile
RE:Wiik NOA
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2006, 09:54:42 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane Less sales means less market share which means less third party support which means less satisfaction on my part.


Many people just don't get this fact.

I don't care about the name: I care about 3rd parties developing for the console after the initial round of launch games, and that depends on system sales.

I don't want to own another dust gatherer like the GC.
"OK, first we need someone to complain about something trivial. Golden or S_B should do. Then we get someone to defend the game, like Bill or Mashiro. Finally add some Unclebob or Pro666 randomness and the thread should go to hell right away." -Pap64