That's not how it works Perm. The
6310 is low wattage, low budget, low end GPU for Netbooks mean for and I quote:
Video Viewing, casual online gaming, web browsing, instant messaging and e-mail.
It's the ATI equivalent of an integrated INTEL chipset.
The 6770 is an actual main line card. Note
here the specs and no where there is the 6310 listed because it is an unrelated product. You can find the specs to both items
here, the 6310 is under IGP line and the 6770 is under
Northern Island.
The 6770 has almost 10x the bandwidth. 10x the number of cores, has
17 times raw computing power. They are two completely different classes of product which are only related in the sense they are designed by ATI. My current old Nvidia
9800GT released in July 2008 is 6.3 times the raw computing power over the 6310 and half that of the rumoured WiiU chip you pointed to.
You have strung together two unrelated bits of data and called it a pattern. Also
Moore's Law is an
observation and is about to come to an end in around 2013 where the expected doubling of transistor counts and densities are to only happen every 3 years.
As for the WiiU being more powerful than the PS360, that is guaranteed. The 360 and PS3 GPUs are based on technology with unit's of measurements in the Millions. Current graphics cards including mine are measured the Giga or Billions. Unless Nintendo went mental and actually choose the 6310, there would be no way in hell the WiiU could even be considered on par with the PS360. After getting over the WTF moment, ATI would laugh them off for trying to order something so weak.
Brandogg assessment is correct, the Radon 6310 is garbage. Next time someone tells you that the WiiU is weaker or on par to the PS360, tell them is physically impossible since Nintendo couldn't order something so weak as a new product.
A large part of the reason why consoles can be as cheap as they are is because the likes of the Big 3 can guarantee orders of components in the 10's~100's of millions which allow the production line to spread the cost of tooling and streamline the entire line for the next 5+ years, so instead of paying today's per unit cost they can pay something closer to the average price over the next 5 years. This is something e-machines can't do since for each line of computers they may only sell in the 10's to 100's of thousands which means they pay much closer to today's price, not the future. So comparing an e-machine to the WiiU is not possible since they exist in completely different economies of scale.