Though I love GS, i'd rather not see this RPG become a GS sequel. I'd like Camelot to have a completely blank canvas and do with it whatever the hell they want to. Nintendo is the type to be patient with developers (something I've always loved) and since this announcement is years in advance to the REV outing, I bet they could really make something....well Revolutionary. A new GS would limit that freedom. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a GS, but maybe after this new RPG. Later in the REV's life-span....."GS annouced for late 200X." We'd all go nuts once again, even the people new to Nintendo becuse they played Camelots new RPG. Also, how many sequels are we getting? Too many I'm guessing. If Nintendo wants to really be innovative...create new mascots for crying out loud. Pokemon was great but that was how long ago?
Also, the thing with sequels, they tend to get reviewed lower than the original. Something about people's anticipation and experience with the previous game just ruins the new one alittle. People want this since they had that in the previous game, and cuase of this it would be awesome instead of this they did that, so this game sequel should be...2+2...-6...x 11....two times better! Ya it's gonna ROCK!
It would just be better if they made something original, plain and simple. They already made a sequel, so give it a rest...try something new then hit us with nostalgia (sp?) later.
just my two cents...