Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jasonditz

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 82
26
The statistics in question are not "hypothetical"... they are real statistics derived from real statistical analysis.

27
Quote

Originally posted by: Mashiro
But it's all hypothetical, big deal.

Hypothetically I could go out and kill 100 people, hypothetically I could never do an act of violence in my life, blah blah.


I think you may be mistaken about the definition of that word, hypothetically speaking.

28
General Gaming / RE: Speaking of Madden...
« on: August 25, 2007, 05:55:08 PM »
yeah... there are sites that are carrying it too: who knew?


29
I wasn't aware we had someone else with a degree in mathematics in the discussion. My estimates aren't pulled from thin air but are based on the data that is available (culled from numerous sources), and while they may be rough I can assure you that the margin of error is nowhere near so large as to make three million absolute pacifists living in the United States a remote possibility.

If you have a piece of data suggesting that this is the case I would urge you to present it... as it would be both exceedingly relevant to the discussion at hand and of considerable personal interest.  

30
Quote

Originally posted by: darkheart
I just want facts.  I see no links to research studies here that go with any of these numbers being spewed and IF you decide to give me research studies IT HAS TO BE from a REAL study, none of those college study reports.

I had several paragraphs I was writing about the issues stated on the previous page but erased it due to it being risque on breaking forum policies.  I do not want to discuss taboo subjects.


Are you asking about my numbers? They're based on this:

How many absolute pacifists are there in the United States or on the planet? Everyone else, by definition, is willing to use violence in some case or other or at the very least wants someone else to do so in their name.

I'd be fascinated in knowing exactly how many of us there are either in the country or on the planet. Sadly, there is no polling data available to that effect (since a good chunk of America's pacifists are of anabaptist churches that eschew technology, I can't exactly commission a telephone poll and expect a reliable result). However I would be shocked, absolutely shocked, if it was anywhere near 1% of the population.

That'd be 3 million pacifists in the United States alone. Can there possibly be that many? My experience says absolutely not, and my own attempts at calculation, while having a pretty big margin of error, turn up at the high end about a quarter that amount: and to even get that many we need to assume that every member of the traditionally pacifist churches in the United States is an absolute pacifist.



31
Is every Nintendo customer service rep privy to every single licensing deal the company has signed?


32
General Gaming / RE: Speaking of Madden...
« on: August 25, 2007, 04:50:52 PM »
08 didn't come out on the Cube either, did it?

33
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Chibi Robo:Park Patrol to be Wal-mart exclusive(?)
« on: August 24, 2007, 10:59:52 AM »
Has anyone played it either way? The only review I saw give it a 1/10, citing crashing... but I think that was the overseas version, maybe they fixed it?

34
Quote

Originally posted by: Sir_Stabbalot
Quote

Originally posted by: jasonditz
Anyhow, the philosophy from which such consequences would follow is the philosophy of Leo Tolstoy.


Why didn't you mention that in the first place? It seemed you were condoning radical violence at first, which would have been really out there.  But now that you mention Tolstoy, your arguments make much more sense, as you're not condoning any violence or threat of violence. I still don't get the 99% theory, though. I've never heard of that before...


I mentioned that I was a pacifist fairly early on.  

35
Why would you take war and imprisonment out?  

36
Quote

Originally posted by: thatguy
I think you sharply misunderstand Tolstoy and the political, social, and religious environment of which he lived.


If Tolstoy was on this list you'd have already insisted he go get therapy.

37
Quote

Originally posted by: UncleBob
Seriously dude, regardless of your thoughts on PETA, you seriously need to consider seeking out help.  Like, real, professional help.  If you really think that 99+% of people will resort to violence to force their point of view on other people and you have such a deep hatred for human kind, you've seriously got some issues.

Look, I hear ya man... I hate the human race too... but there's the healthy, rational "I hate everyone because I work in customer service and I see how stupid everyone is" kinda hating everyone, then there's your totally not rational thoughts...


I don't hate the human race at all... I'm just realistic about them.

Lets break it down a bit (and I apologize to the foreigners here, but this breakdown will be America-centric)

How many people want violence used, either by the state or private forces, to prevent abortions?

How many people want violence used, either by the state or private forces, to prevent gay people from marrying?

How many people want violence used, either by the state or private forces, to prevent racism?

How many people want violence used, either by the state or private forces, to prevent Mexicans from entering the country?

We can continue this list virtually ad infinitum: Dog fights, to protect intellectual property, to protect the environment, to stop the environmentalists, to stop interracial marriages, to spread democracy, etc.

Now on the other hand, how many people are there who would never use violence to advance some agenda, and would never want someone else doing so in their name?  

38
Quote

Originally posted by: Sir_Stabbalot
Quote

Originally posted by: jasonditz
You may well be in that less than 1%... who knows. But yes, virtually everyone around you will use violence against you (or suppose someone else using violence against you) in some case if you disagree with them or refuse to obey them.


Where did you pick up this theory? Really, I would like to know, as this is just so alien to me. This is the first time I've heard of it, and it just seems odd. I've been in lots of arguments and debates, but I've never had anyone pull out a baseball bat and beat me to a pulp.


Don't feel bad, since its the philosophy of way, way less than 1% of the population most people wouldn't be familiar with it. I wasn't really intending to start a big philosophical discussion when I posted that link to the flash game in this thread by the way, I just thought it was a quaint (if overly simple) little game that had a bunch of Mario characters in it doing silly things. I know a lot of people don't like PETA, but I wasn't expecting the overt comparisons to al-Qaeda and really... I didn't know where else to go with discussion at that point.

Anyhow, the philosophy from which such consequences would follow is the philosophy of Leo Tolstoy.  

39
Quote

Originally posted by: Arbok
Quote

Originally posted by: Mashiro
Also wouldn't 99%+ mean 100%?


Technically no, it could be 99.5%, for example.


Yeah... I don't have an exact figure... I know it is less than 100%, but in my experience it is also considerably more than 99%.

The odds that a random person will not use violence against you if it is to his benefit, or won't at least support someone else using violence against you if it is to his benefit is way way longer than 100 to 1. Hence, 99%+

40
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
They regards themselves as above the rest of us.  It's not about animal rights it's about PETA being in charge.  It's the meglomaniac that wants to make the world a better place by being supreme dictator.


The megalomaniac or... in modern parlance, the voter.


41
Quote

Originally posted by: Mashiro
If that statistic were true we would all already be dead and the world we be devoid of human life as we would have killed each other by now.


That... doesn't follow at all.


42
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
"Using violence to force others to agree with one's point of view hardly seems extremist. As I said before... 99%+ of people are willing to do that."

I guess I make up that less than 1%.  I had no idea that virtually everyone around me will use violence against me if I have a different opinion than them.

That statment just sounds outright INSANE.  At worst people might THINK about using violence to force others to agree with them.  Sometimes when someone disagrees with you it's not irregular to think to yourself "jerk, I oughta punch him in the face" but few people actually go beyond that.

Though even if that was the case I still wouldn't tolerate it.  I really don't care what the majority thinks.  If it logically seems wrong to me then I think it's wrong even if the rest of the world disagrees with me.


You may well be in that less than 1%... who knows. But yes, virtually everyone around you will use violence against you (or suppose someone else using violence against you) in some case if you disagree with them or refuse to obey them.



43
I'd be up for another Powerstone game... I bet they could do something very interesting with Wii controls.

44
Using violence to force others to agree with one's point of view hardly seems extremist. As I said before... 99%+ of people are willing to do that.

45
There was a Burgertime sequel for the Intellivision... it was called "Diner".


46
Faxanadu 2 (yeah, I know there were other games in the series, but they were so different)
NBA Courtside 2008
Tales of Symphonia 2
New Super Mario Bros. 2
CIMA 2

47
Quote

Originally posted by: UncleBob
Now, to be fair, I doubt anyone on this board decided that they hate PETA because of the flash application, you linking to it or because of your post.  I bet most of us already know that PETA isn't a very respectable group of people.  So, when you come here and post something about PETA, don't be surprised if people reply negatively about it.

I mean, if you came on here and posted a flash game made by Islamic terrorists where the goal was to fly planes into buildings and kill infidel Americans, people would probably get worked up over that one as well.  It's not that we *hate* the flash game or your post, it is that PETA has proven, multiple times, through their actions, that they, as a group, are one of the worst "rights" groups out there.


I don't agree with everything PETA does either, but the repeated comparisons to al-Qaeda seem a bit... over the top... if you don't mind my saying.

48
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Dragon Quest IV Screenshots
« on: August 23, 2007, 03:43:00 AM »
wow... I never got to play the original (though a friend of mine had it), my second NES broke shortly after DQ3 came out and I got fed up and bought a Genesis. I'd love to see 1-3 tossed onto a GBA cartridge or something too. I mean, I have the GBC versions, but those don't work on a DS.


49
General Gaming / RE: Horse game
« on: August 22, 2007, 05:40:58 PM »
The best horse game is the dreamcast import Let's Become Derby Owner

50
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Chibi Robo:Park Patrol to be Wal-mart exclusive(?)
« on: August 22, 2007, 05:38:25 PM »
God... did they remake the US game to be a Warcraft clone or something? Because when I played Settlers for the PC it was very light on combat.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 82