...
excuse me if i was saving for a Wii U, i wasn't in great financal state and i expected... idk a decent launch
Not sure that... sentence (?) make sense. But I'm guessing you're saying that you don't have money for or interest in a Wii U console? No worries. The Xenoblade sequel won't be out for at least a year, probably longer given NoA's track record. Start putting a dollar away every day or two, and by the time the Xenoblade sequel is released you'll have enough for the console and game - better yet, by that point in time the Wii U will have enough games that it'll be worth owning.
On the flipside, if you decide not to grab a Wii U you'd have more than enough for a copy of the original even at highly inflated prices.
...
Because iOS games aren't usually more than $5, and nobody sells free games on consoles. That's not at all an apples to apple comparison. If I see a BRAND NEW console game that I've never heard of for $1 in a $50-60 market, I'm gonna assume something is terribly wrong with that game for it to be a dollar. If you see a brand new console game for $30-40 you think it's a budget game, might be good. 15 bucks? Probably shovel-ware.
First, the example you give ($15) is significantly different than the original one ($1).
Second, while
you might judge games based on pricing the majority of people fall into two categories: uninformed buyers who find brand names and/or low prices appealing for blind-buy purchases, or informed buyers who look to reviews and other sources of information before buying. Xenoblade would sell extremely well to both groups if priced that low.
Finally, it doesn't really matter. There is no way that a new game with the size/scope/quality of Xenoblade could be sold in a console market (arguably, any single market) for that price. So this whole argument is moot.