Then, alright. You're the mod, it's your decision. You asked for my opinion. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Next time, don't moderate his post if you think what he did wasn't wrong.
The world isn't black and white - there are shades of grey in between. It's up to us to determine where on the scale stuff lies. The decisions aren't about "right" or "wrong" - it's about trying to take the best action based off the available information one has at the time. In this case, that involved dealing with someone who I think means well, but has trouble playing with others and doesn't deal well with others when they don't agree with him and do what he wants - which is all a part of determining the best course of action to take. I could have banned you - and some folks think I should have - but that negates the entire "means well" part of things. In spite of your occasional outburst, you do add something to the forum and as long as we can keep those outbursts under control, things can go pretty smoothly.
In Brandogg's case, his comment was so minor and slight, it really wasn't even worth deleting - and had it been anyone else, it probably would have never come up. But, again, we get to this part where we handle you with kid gloves to keep you from being a disruption. Maybe we shouldn't. You, yourself, stated you're unable to act your age... so, do you want us to treat you like an adult going forward?
In Lucario's case, he was activity in the process of causing harm via SPAM. It's a pretty cut-and-dry situation and, instead of even trying to politely ask for details, a few folks flew off the handle with rumors and accusations regarding why he was banned.
All in the day in the life of...