Community Forums => I'M BACK => Topic started by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 07, 2009, 01:36:11 AM
Title: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 07, 2009, 01:36:11 AM
Welcome to the 1st(?) edition of Funhouse Court, where dueling NWR members can settle their differences infront of an audience of their piers under the watchful eyes of the mods all in one convenient non-derailing thread.
Our 1st(?) case:
The case of He Said, He Said.
(http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=895;type=avatar) VS (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=940;type=avatar)
Deguello thinks D_Avg. should have been banned, or atlease warned for his conduct towards him(and everyone else) in the forums.
D_Avg. believes that Deguello started it all and has himself done no wrong.
The mods have yet to interfere, so who is in the right, who is in the wrong?
Will both members please step forward and present their cases for the court.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 07, 2009, 01:38:28 AM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court
Post by: King of Twitch on October 07, 2009, 01:40:27 AM
HEY
Title: Re: Funhouse Court
Post by: D_Average on October 07, 2009, 01:50:03 AM
Really??? Is the forum really a better place if everyone nodes their head in agreement?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court
Post by: Dasmos on October 07, 2009, 02:07:40 AM
i will node my head in agreement.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 07, 2009, 02:13:58 AM
Yep this is the best place. Better here than derailing another thread.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 07, 2009, 02:21:17 AM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
You dare to step into my Funhouse and challenge me in my Fuhouse Court and think you have a chance at a fair & just trial?
You are hereby held in contempt of this court and are not allowed to return until you have provided proof of sense. The sense you need to acquire is very common, yet it seems to have eluded you.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: NWR_DrewMG on October 07, 2009, 08:21:34 AM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
Jeez, you post ONE thread about how The Last Guardian will be the greatest single player game EVER...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 07, 2009, 12:39:32 PM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
PRO DAISY IS ON GP'S GOOD SIDE
I HAVE ABSOLOOT VICTORY OVRE THIS FORUM
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 07, 2009, 01:08:11 PM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
You dare to step into my Funhouse and challenge me in my Fuhouse Court and think you have a chance at a fair & just trial?
You are hereby held in contempt of this court and are not allowed to return until you have provided proof of sense. The sense you need to acquire is very common, yet it seems to have eluded you.
You aren't the boss of me.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: Peachylala on October 07, 2009, 01:48:10 PM
I think GP's court life-meter went down by half.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: EasyCure on October 07, 2009, 02:17:04 PM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
PRO DAISY IS ON GP'S GOOD SIDE
I HAVE ABSOLOOT VICTORY OVRE THIS FORUM
A god poasts among us..
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: Stogi on October 07, 2009, 02:32:43 PM
ooh ooh ooh
Can I be the devil?!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: EasyCure on October 07, 2009, 03:30:44 PM
No, that spot goes to whichever mod is willing.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: Peachylala on October 07, 2009, 04:19:26 PM
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
PRO DAISY IS ON GP'S GOOD SIDE
I HAVE ABSOLOOT VICTORY OVRE THIS FORUM
A supreme god poasts among us..
Fixed.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: Mop it up on October 07, 2009, 04:30:45 PM
Looks like I may have to be an expert witness in the case of GoldenPhoenix vs. The Funhouse.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 07, 2009, 04:33:58 PM
Hope you've read up on your LIMITED SLIP DIFFERENTIAL -- that POSITRACTION is a slippery beast, GIRLFRIEND.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: Khushrenada on October 07, 2009, 06:40:06 PM
Can I be a lawyer? It's the role I was born to play!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 07, 2009, 06:47:39 PM
But who would you represent? Deg vs D Avg. has already been settled out of court and the next case on the docket is GP vs The Funhouse.
Mop it up has already spoke up on behalf of GP so that leaves you as the public defender and champion/lawyer of The Funhouse.
Court will convene Friday October 9th. So that leaves both sides with ample time to prepare their cases.
Now I have a request for our photoshoppers out there. Can someone come up with a "avatar"/pic/banner for The Funhouse so that The Funhouse has proper visual representation?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 07, 2009, 09:21:16 PM
I would like to know why I am on GP's list.
Khushrenada I am sure you will do fine.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deguello vs D_Average
Post by: EasyCure on October 07, 2009, 09:50:33 PM
I can think of a few reasons but I'd better save them for when I present them in court.
I would like to know why I'm NOT on GP's list.
Come to think of it, I can think of no incident where you two have ever talked to one another.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: that Baby guy on October 08, 2009, 01:23:42 AM
No? Look at the Scribblenauts review! That's one. Other than that, hmm... I don't like most Zelda games, and I think she hates that, I don't recall what else.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 08, 2009, 01:26:43 AM
You don't like Zelda? What kind of Nintendo fan are you? A blasphemous one, that's what!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: that Baby guy on October 08, 2009, 01:32:53 AM
I didn't say I don't like Zelda. I said I dislike most Zelda games. A Link to the Past and Four Swords Adventures were my favorites, and most of the other ones I've played don't hold a candle to them.
She's well aware of that, so I figured I'd be on the "list" now.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 08, 2009, 11:44:54 AM
But who would you represent? Deg vs D Avg. has already been settled out of court and the next case on the docket is GP vs The Funhouse.
Mop it up has already spoke up on behalf of GP so that leaves you as the public defender and champion/lawyer of The Funhouse.
Court will convene Friday October 9th. So that leaves both sides with ample time to prepare their cases.
Awww. I was hoping to get into the Double D case. Deg and D_Ave. Oh well. Let's see who I did end up drawing. The funhouse?! Awww nuts. Well, if I have to defend the funhouse counsel requests the services of the NWR search engine Vudu. And I'm just going to wing it. I think my client would want it this way.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 08, 2009, 12:01:40 PM
You supported Rowsdower '08; that really fanned her political flames.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: vudu on October 08, 2009, 01:49:05 PM
But who would you represent? Deg vs D Avg. has already been settled out of court and the next case on the docket is GP vs The Funhouse.
Mop it up has already spoke up on behalf of GP so that leaves you as the public defender and champion/lawyer of The Funhouse.
Court will convene Friday October 9th. So that leaves both sides with ample time to prepare their cases.
Awww. I was hoping to get into the Double D case. Deg and D_Ave. Oh well. Let's see who I did end up drawing. The funhouse?! Awww nuts. Well, if I have to defend the funhouse counsel requests the services of the NWR search engine Vudu. And I'm just going to wing it. I think my client would want it this way.
You were named in GP vs FH case, so you would also be defending yourself. you are your client.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 08, 2009, 06:37:37 PM
Bah! I'm not going to worry about that. She's just upset since I was the leading cause of her death in the latest mafia. Yet, before that, I was one of the early voices arguing on her behalf to let her live longer in the game. As well, I've been able to work together with her to get a couple of mafia victories. So, I think I can ride out this one moment of wronging her and settle out of court. Backroom deals. Is there anything sweeter?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 08, 2009, 06:56:45 PM
Now I have a request for our photoshoppers out there. Can someone come up with a "avatar"/pic/banner for The Funhouse so that The Funhouse has proper visual representation?
Here's my submission:
someone just needs to photoshop and actual banner with the words "funhouse" on here and.. presto! (http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/drunk-dude-11.jpg)
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 08, 2009, 07:09:05 PM
Now I have a request for our photoshoppers out there. Can someone come up with a "avatar"/pic/banner for The Funhouse so that The Funhouse has proper visual representation?
Here's my submission:
someone just needs to photoshop and actual banner with the words "funhouse" on here and.. presto! (http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/drunk-dude-11.jpg)
upload it to tinypic then edit it with their software. you can add text (just remember to click on transparent background)
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 08, 2009, 07:16:10 PM
My case for ban hammers:
BNM-Way too mild for the forums
Deg- Is a D_Average/Ian Magenet
D_Average-Has PS3 cooties
Maxi- Won't let me pick any of his flowers in Animal Crossing
Lindy - Won't answer my PMs and also has PS3 cooties
Pale- Hides the fact that he is a big Kingdom Hearts fan from me
Mr. Jack - Traitor to everyone, including his old username. Mr. Pants doesn't deserve that.
Ian - Broke his promise about leaving. Also is Canadian
Stogi - Broke his promise about not posting much.
Easycure - Has been a terrible Mexican.
Zap - Username is only 3 letters
Khush - Always gets me killed in Mafia. Name is too long and weird.
DrewMG- Didn't make the next mafia game Pong vs Asteroids PHAIL
Cases proven, I WIN.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 08, 2009, 07:16:31 PM
Now I have a request for our photoshoppers out there. Can someone come up with a "avatar"/pic/banner for The Funhouse so that The Funhouse has proper visual representation?
Here's my submission:
someone just needs to photoshop and actual banner with the words "funhouse" on here and.. presto! (http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/drunk-dude-11.jpg)
upload it to tinypic then edit it with their software. you can add text (just remember to click on transparent background)
If i didn't wanna be a lazy peice of ****, don't you think i woulda done that already?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Peachylala on October 08, 2009, 07:19:34 PM
HOORAY, I'm not on GP's hit list. I'm rolling in mud right now.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: vudu on October 08, 2009, 07:27:23 PM
If GP has her way everyone but me and Bill Aurion will be gone. Oh wait ...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 08, 2009, 07:44:40 PM
My case for ban hammers: Easycure - Has been a terrible Mexican.
Aight, listen here lil missy...
I know this is the funhouse but you don't get the same leniancy as the rest of us because you're so anti-fucking funhouse, so i'm going to take offense to that statement because its obviously not a joke coming from you. It's easy to guess where your political stance is on immagrants but just because you don't like me and don't want me around here doesn't mean you can bring up race as an issue. Oh and if you do, get the right fucking one; I'm NOT mexican, i'm ecuadorian.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: ThePerm on October 08, 2009, 08:01:32 PM
whoa Easycure is Ecuadorian? News to me. So did you ever live there or was that just your parent. Thats a dream of mine, to go to Ecuador and flush the toilet and have the water go straight down in stead of twirl.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 08, 2009, 08:29:23 PM
whoa Easycure is Ecuadorian? News to me. So did you ever live there or was that just your parent. Thats a dream of mine, to go to Ecuador and flush the toilet and have the water go straight down in stead of twirl.
I'm Ecuadorian by blood only, in spirit i'm all-american. I was the first american born in my family and thus they gave me the whitest name out of all of us "Michael Daniel [last name]"
I've only been there once, when i was in the first grade and I hated it because I didn't know what "third world country" meant back than. Why was it so hot.. where was the A/C? Why can't I buy a can of coke and take it with me*... and my favorite:
HOLY FUCKING **** THERE'S A CAT ON THE ROOF OF THAT HOUSE EATING A MOUSE INSIDE-OUT! i didnt' know they actually do that!
My family over there (all my mothers family, my fathers family migrated here much earlier) all teased me about being a "fat american" and teased me about my spanish (which wasn't so great back then). The only fun part of the trip was when we visited the Galapagos Islands.. that **** was amazing. We took a small plane to the coast of the country and then took a small boat to the isles. They anchored off the shore of one of the biggers isles for a bit to let us all go swimming.. in shark infested waters lol. I got to see all those animals the rest of you only see in the school science books; blue footed boobys (or whatever) and those gigantic ancient turtles. It was awesome.
I'll have to go back some day, now that I can appreciate the differences.. (and now that its not so "third world" anymore).
*When walking thru the market places and i asked my mum to get me a coke, they had only bottles but unless you wanted to pay extra you couldn't actually take the bottle with you.. You could go up to a guy and be like "lemme get half a coke" and he'd pour you some in a plastic bag so you could take it with you... Sure, you could get the whole bottle poured in to a bag but my family was too cheap for that, so i always got around half a bottle. Straws? Extra $ too.. howd you drink it? Snip a hole in the corner and let it pour into your mouth. In first grade i thought "wow.. this isn't for me."
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 08, 2009, 11:16:05 PM
That's interesting EasyCure, I'll bet it was great to visit your "homeland" so to speak.
It actually makes me wonder... Most of my relatives live in Scotland, so I have never met them. If I ever visited there, I wonder if they would make fun of me for my Americanisms? I don't really know much about them so I don't know if they would be like that or not. But it does give me second thoughts about taking that trip...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Plugabugz on October 09, 2009, 08:00:40 AM
So THAT explains easycure's and stogi's unending bromance...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 09, 2009, 12:54:56 PM
I'm Ecuadorian by blood only, in spirit i'm all-american. I was the first american born in my family and thus they gave me the whitest name out of all of us "Michael Daniel [last name]"
I can fill in the blank!!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Plugabugz on October 09, 2009, 05:07:02 PM
So THAT explains easycure's and stogi's unending bromance...
I don't get it...
I don't either :)
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stogi on October 09, 2009, 06:02:36 PM
Are you saying it's because we're both first generation Americans?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 09, 2009, 06:11:14 PM
All rise.... just kidding, you can sit now.
We are all here to hear the case brought forth before us today. The case of GP vs The Funhouse
We have on the plaintiffs side Golden Phoenix (http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd191/goldenphoenix10/vampiregirl.jpg), being represented by the "clean to a fault" Mop_it_up (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/ThreeImaginaryBoys/Yoshi_and_Birdo_by_animefuzz.jpg)
on the side of the defendants, we have BlackNMild2k1 (http://i35.tinypic.com/fksnrq.jpg), Deguello (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=895;type=avatar), D_Average (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=940;type=avatar), Maxi (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v156/SixSidedVideo/reggiebound.jpg), Lindy (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=958;type=avatar), Pale(http://mikegamin.com/images/avatars/impailedAvatar100x100.png), Nick DiMola (aka Mr. Jack) (http://nicholasdimola.googlepages.com/mrpants.jpg), Ian Sane(http://www3.telus.net/sewellr/Batman.JPG), Kashogi Y. Stogi (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=959;type=avatar), Easycure (http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l28/ThreeImaginaryBoys/clay_bmonkey-1.png), Zap (http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/112/l_b1bdc6ba69da4706ad46f34aeb9768b1.jpg), Khushrenada (http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d95/TKush/Donkey%20Kong/Chimera.jpg) & DrewMG (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=967;type=avatar) being represented by the "like no other" & the Funhouse's own
Golden Phoenix has stated the reason for bringing this case to the court, which is documented and accessible to the public ::here (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=29561.msg554734#msg554734)::, and now is the time for the Representation for both sides to present their cases to prove or disprove why such claims hold merit and should be recognized by not only The Funhouse but the NWR forums as a whole.
Michael Buffer: "LET'S GET READY TO..." ::gavel::
Court is now in session.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 09, 2009, 06:58:32 PM
The defense requests a recess since they will not be around until 4-5 hours later.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 09, 2009, 07:22:11 PM
Court is now in adjourned, but the plaintiff may still present their case for when court is back in session.
Let's all reconvene in about 4-5 hours time.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 10, 2009, 12:30:31 AM
*looks around*
**** did this trial get moved to a bigger court?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: D_Average on October 10, 2009, 12:39:04 AM
I'll make my case.
Charge:
"D_Average - Has PS3 cooties"
Nothing could be further from the truth. If I had such a disease I would own and apologetically defend such titles as Killzone 2, Resistance 2, Metal Gear Solid, Gran Tourismo, Rachet and Clank, and Uncharted. While I have played some of these games, I own none of them and could care less about most of them. In fact, I have far more Wii/GCN titles than PS3 and I've never purchased a PSP which is usually a symptom of such a disease. And though I do I own LBP, I basically think it sucks. At the end of the day, I'm just an "average" gamer who plays whatever is fun at the moment. Such a stereotype as "ps3 cooties" makes me mad and turn into a mean nasty troll. I just want the court to force GP to see me as I really am. Stop player hatin.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 10, 2009, 12:44:48 AM
No, just delayed till Saturday morning. Waiting for the representation to present their cases.
Mop_it_up is free to go first. I think she would want to get her clients accusations burned into the minds of the jury before Khush comes in and tears it all down, complete with alibi's and witness statements, or whatever he has prepared.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 10, 2009, 02:02:48 AM
Well, if GP is the prosecution, she should go first. Unless Mop_it_up is the prosecution. If GP wants to argue that she has gone first by listing why each person charged deserves the banhammer, fine. I'll then present my opening statement. And even if we weren't in a trial setting, I'd still let GP go first. After all, I believe in chivalry and that means ladies first. However, it also means I believe in honor and therefore view it as a duel. If GP is unwilling to accept this challenge, then she shall be charged as cowardly, unhonorable and a liar who should henceforth be banned from the funhouse area.
In other words, the defence is ready.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 10, 2009, 02:47:35 AM
"CHEWBACCA IS A WOOKIE"
"LOOK AT THE MONKEY, LOOK AT THE LITTLE MONKEY!"
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 10, 2009, 04:47:05 PM
Hmmm GP and Mop_it_up haven't shown up yet.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stogi on October 10, 2009, 06:06:13 PM
I take it that the jury is everybody else not in the trail.
The internet is HUGE, the jury is selected from it. That is all you need to know.
Is that how it works Mop_it_up? Am I doing it right?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 11, 2009, 05:45:42 AM
The facts are simple. GoldenPhoenix has come into this forum, this courthouse, and declared her judgement better than those charged here today. In fact, so greatly does she esteem her evaluation of these individuals that she states they are deserving of banishment from these forums. Strong words. Especially so if she had a reliable reputation she could use to add further weight to her opinions. But she doesn't. You can not trust her. You can not trust her because she is inexperienced, ignorant of facts, and manipulative. That will be clear for all to see by this trial's end. The defense has no further comment at this point.
Let the prosecution begin their case and call their first witness. I'm looking forward to it.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 11, 2009, 01:33:36 PM
Is that how it works Mop_it_up? Am I doing it right?
Everything that you do is wrong.
It only seems that way because you are looking at it from the wrong side of the glass. Come to our side and you will see how right everything is.
But I shouldn't say anything more, if you have more comments please direct them at my lawyer. He will be happy to respond on my behalf.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 11, 2009, 01:42:20 PM
And who is your lawyer? I thought you were representing yourself.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 11, 2009, 01:49:57 PM
I'm with The Funhouse, on the right side of the Looking Glass. We are being represented by Khushrenada.
GP's Lawyer doesn't even know who she is up against...... smh
GP's case being represented by Mop_it_up; (http://i35.tinypic.com/zmxpqu.jpg) Going nowhere.... real fast
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 11, 2009, 01:55:30 PM
I'm not GoldenPhoenix's lawyer, I think she's representing herself. I'm just stalling until she gets here, as I was hoping she'd pull up some examples for her claims. If not, then I guess I may have to do it myself...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 11, 2009, 02:19:27 PM
"He(she) who represents him(her)self has a fool for a client." - Abraham Lincoln
Besides, did you not read the Funhouse Court docket #000002 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=29561.msg554930#msg554930)?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 01:38:54 AM
Your honor, are we going to have to wait forever for the prosecution to get their act together. May I remind you the post that started this all?
I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!
Please note the bolded text. These defendents are ready and raring to face their accuser. However, she is suddenly nowhere to be found. Well actually, that's not true. She can easily be found posting in pretty much any other thread but this one. She seems completely unwilling to have to back up her strong words. How unwilling? My I point out the prosecution's past comments:
I'm not GoldenPhoenix's lawyer, I think she's representing herself.
Well, wait just a minute. If you are not her lawyer, then why do we have this third party suddenly involved in the trial and acting like the prosecution? Why should she even be making comments on the trial? Where is GP, the one who wanted the defendents to face her? The defendents are more than happy to face her. GP, however, seems disinterested in facing them.
If not, then I guess I may have to do it myself...
Well, now we understand Mop_it_up's role. She's just doing her best to help a friend and stick up for her. I think that reflects pretty darn well on her character. So, I will not focus any attack or arguements against Mop_it_up. She's performing a noble task. And how is GP responding to this fine act of loyalty?
I'm just stalling until she gets here, as I was hoping she'd pull up some examples for her claims.
Wow. She's just left her friend holding the bag and appearantly has not done anything to aid her friend in defending her. I think this right here says much in our trial already about the trustworthiness of GP's character and her claims. I'd like to take a moment to address my esteemed colleague on the prosecution's side, Mop_it_up.
I have much respect for you. Your willingness to stand on the opposing side with GP and without question to fight along in her defence is a worthy stance and one I would hope all of my friends would take if ever I were questioned on a matter. Loyalty is the biggest key in any friendship. But I would also never leave the burden of my troubles on any of my friends. I would face the brunt of any fire that comes my way and take the heat coming my way. I'd just ask for their support as I take such a stand. I wouldn't want to see them get burnt. My point is this, you've proven you are a dependable and true friend by coming to GP's aid. But that doesnt' mean you have to fight her battles. It will not reflect poorly on you to walk away from this and let it go. We've all seen your actions on her behalf and I've made sure that they are duly noted. But GP needs to do something to help you out now and back you up.
With that matter addressed, you honor, I'd now like to make a motion that these charges brought upon the defendents be tossed out of court and the defendents found innocent of them. As we can see, the prosecution seems to have no real idea how to proceed with their star witness vanishing and no evidence on hand to back up their claims. Although I would like to ask for the prosecution's support on this motion, I do not expect and do not rely on it and would still motion for this dismissal without it. I see no reason for our court system to be clogged up with baseless charges brought about by citizens unwilling to testify on them. We can not expect to continue waiting indefinitely for witnesses and evidence to appear. You either have a case or you don't. From what we've seen already, the prosecution doesn't seem to have a case. Thus, I defer this motion to you, you honor, and await your ruling on the matter.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 01:58:00 AM
Prosecution has till 12noon Monday to produce a case or I have no choice but to dismiss this case as the Defense has so convincingly motioned to do.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 03:39:27 AM
Why should I have to defend anything when Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy have not defended themselves against my accusations? Seems as if they have something to hide, and are no shows which means they are on the run from something.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 04:01:30 AM
They are included in "The Funhouse" which is being represented as a whole by Khushrenada. You have till 12noon Monday Oct. 12th 2009 to present your case to the court beyond the initial accusation that you have already made or I have no choice but to sustain the motion to dismiss this case.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 04:04:05 AM
They are included in "The Funhouse" which is being represented as a whole by Khushrenada. You have till 12noon Monday Oct. 12th 2009 to present your case to the court beyond the initial accusation that you have already made or I have no choice but to sustain the motion to dismiss this case.
I call Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy for a cross examination. Not only that since few of the mentioned posters actually visit the funhouse, I have to call shenanigans on the naming of this case, it shows an unfair bias. I demand the case be represented by someone else and a mistrial be called
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: vudu on October 12, 2009, 01:32:45 PM
GP has no concept of innocent until proven guilty.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 03:10:59 PM
I call Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy for a cross examination. Not only that since few of the mentioned posters actually visit the funhouse, I have to call shenanigans on the naming of this case, it shows an unfair bias. I demand the case be represented by someone else and a mistrial be called
While it is truly a joyous time seeing that our prodigal daughter has returned to grace this courtroom with her prescence, unfortunately, she did not spend that time on law. It may surprise you to know that in order to make a cross-examination, a witness has to have first come to the stand and testified for the other lawyer to then perform a cross-examination. There has been no testimony given yet by the defense since we are still waiting for the prosecution to present their facts before we present ours. Moreover, if one does call a witness forward, it is just that. A witness. Not witnesses. We don't have people all testify at once. Please select one. Further, I fail to see why the prosecution would want to call forth defendants to testify and base their whole case on hostile witnesses when they could wait to cross-examine them when called on by the defense. It might be more beneficial to call forth a witness that is on your side.
Finally, as for the naming of the case, we can call it GoldenPhoenix vs Deguello, Ian Sane, BlacknMild2k1, etc or GP vs Various NWR Members. That has no bearing on the evidence or the case. Blame the media for trying to sensationalize the case or oversimplifying matters. It happens. Moreover, I fail to see how the naming of the case is showing unfair bias especially considering how patient we have been on your behalf to the point that we have to basically help you along in this trial while you drag your feet. On the other hand, you have shown nothing but a negative and uncooperative attitude to the whole court proceedings. You have been pretty biased on everything done while the court is trying it's hardest to treat you as fairly as possible. You want to claim bias? Do so after you actually have some evidence to show a biased attitude from the court during the trial and motion for a mistrial then.
As for the case being represented by someone else, are you refering to the prosecution or the defense? There has been no criticism directed my way by my clients who have been pleased by my performance on defense. Moreover, if they did not like my performance on their behalf, they are more than welcome to dismiss me and have someone else represent them. But that is not the prosecution's call. Now, if it is the prosecution you are requesting be represented by someone else, we've already had Mop_it_up come in and fill that role for you. But I must say, it again reflects rather poorly on the fact that you can not present and pursue the very case and charges you yourself made.
As for a mistrial, that is clearly laughable as there has been nothing done yet to warrent a mistrial. Well, except for on the prosecution's side who seem to have no idea how legal proceedings work. For the prosecution to be calling for a mistrial this early and before they even present any evidence on their case is most incredible and damning. Which brings me back to my earlier motion to have this case dismissed and the charges dropped. Your honor, the prosecution would clearly like to see my clients reputations damaged by continuing to drag on court proceedings by not presenting any case and calling for a mistrial meaning they would still have to be tried again. I fail to see how a future trial would change anything for the prosecution's case at this point considering we've yet to see anything from the prosecution. I say, shame on the prosecution for not doing their job and ask for a dismissal of the case and for my clients to be found innocent and freed from this harassement from the prosecution.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 03:32:08 PM
There is a flaw in your argument Khush, who says this is the U.S. judicial system this is the web? I have the power, I have the seniority, and it is going to be tried under MY RULES, Sophia the Goths Rules.. Also no one has denied my complaints directed towards them or proven them as untrue.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 04:00:02 PM
You have made a claim, brought it to court, yet fail to provide any evidence to back up the claims that you have based this case upon. You have also failed to recognize the Legitimacy and Authority of the Court and are hereby being held in contempt until you willing to abide by the rules and regulations of The Funhouse Judicial System.
Either provide the court with evidence to support your claims or this case will be be dismissed and all charges will be dropped. You have 3 hours from the time of this posting to prove you have a case at all.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:00:10 PM
I've never claimed this to be the U.S. Judicial system. We all know this is funhouse court and so I am following the Funhouse Judicial System of rules. What you are describing is great if this trial were being held in SophiaLand.
EDIT: My apologies your honor. It appears we were on the same wavelength. I did not know I would be repeating you.
There is a flaw in your argument Khush, who says this is the U.S. judicial system this is the web? I have the power, I have the seniority, and it is going to be tried under MY RULES, Sophia the Goths Rules.. Also no one has denied my complaints directed towards them or proven them as untrue.
Objection!
There is a flaw in your arguement, GP. I can name 3 people off the top of my head, Easycure, D_Average and Khushrenada who have all denied your claims and made statements as to why they are untrue. In fact, they did so in this thread. You astound me at how you are unable to proceed correctly with anything to do with this case. I can see why you might now have requested for the prosecution to be represented by someone else.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 04:07:35 PM
You have made a claim, brought it to court, yet fail to provide any evidence to back up the claims that you have based this case upon. You have also failed to recognize the Legitimacy and Authority of the Court and are hereby being held in contempt until you willing to abide by the rules and regulations of The Funhouse Judicial System.
Either provide the court with evidence to support your claims or this case will be be dismissed and all charges will be dropped. You have 3 hours from the time of this posting to prove you have a case at all.
I don't recognize the authority of this court, the only authority I recognize is the www gods, me and Lindy Luthor. So my contempt is directed at this mockery called a courtroom and its pseudo judge BNM, who shouldn't be making a final decision since he is a defendant with an obvious bias as to the outcome.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:13:48 PM
That's interesting considering Lindy is also one of the people you have named in this trial, yet you would recognize his authority. Therefore, if Lindy was the judge of this trial, you would abide by his ruling despite the fact that he is a defendant. I don't why it then can not work for BnM to be the judge since he is in the same situation. Except that you refuse to recoginize him as having authority even thought he instituted this very system of law. And becuase I'm a classy lawyer, I have no intention of playing the race card.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 04:15:32 PM
Lindy doesn't have any interest in these proceedings, he has failed to respond so I trust he doesn't' care about the outcome, and he is the NWR god.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:21:47 PM
If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 04:28:15 PM
If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.
Lindy is god, so if he had an axe to grind he would have done it. Case closed.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 12, 2009, 04:34:15 PM
If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.
Lindy is god, so if he had an axe to grind he would have done it. Case closed.
Lindy theGOD DOESN'T EXIST
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:39:49 PM
Objection your honor. Lindy is being represented by the defense. Therefore, any "axe he has to grind" would be done through the proper channels. His lawyer. Therefore, I guess you could say he is doing it. Moreover, the prosecution is focusing on bizarre irrelavent matters that have nothing to do with the case on hand nor have they been able to respond to any of the other arguements or contradictions brought forth today regarding their case.
However, if the prosecution wishes to rest their whole case on whether Lindy cares, and make that their evidence and testimony, so be it. The defense will be more than happy to present their side. Of course, that all depends on whether the prosecution is actually about to rest their case. Case closed is improper wording so I'd want to make certain first.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: vudu on October 12, 2009, 04:46:24 PM
This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 04:47:39 PM
This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.
I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer. He is ruining the funhouse and putting peoples to sleep.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:48:20 PM
Awwww. Vudu's entertainment values aren't being met. Hey everyone. Let's give a rip.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 04:53:40 PM
This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.
I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer.
The head? Hey lady, will you get anything right? You started this whole thing and you refuse to end it. That would make you the one in charge of all this nonsense. Not to mention, I'm the lawyer, not the judge so I'm not even the head of this courtroom. And last but not least, I wanted to settle out of court but you made no attempt at starting any dialogue between us. You don't like me and don't want me here? Drop the charges against me and I'm gone. But as long as you want to keep calling me forth to be banned, I'm going to keep ripping into such a sad charge.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stratos on October 12, 2009, 04:58:31 PM
I think this is great entertainment. I grabbed a bag of Cheetos and am just enjoying the show.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 05:00:38 PM
This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.
I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer.
The head? Hey lady, will you get anything right? You started this whole thing and you refuse to end it. That would make you the one in charge of all this nonsense. Not to mention, I'm the lawyer, not the judge so I'm not even the head of this courtroom. And last but not least, I wanted to settle out of court but you made no attempt at starting any dialogue between us. You don't like me and don't want me here? Drop the charges against me and I'm gone. But as long as you want to keep calling me forth to be banned, I'm going to keep ripping into such a sad charge.
No BNM started the thread, I started the correct accusations and you started the mockery. Get it right, geesh.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 12, 2009, 05:01:00 PM
This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.
I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer. He is ruining the funhouse and putting peoples to sleep.
Or we can just go to the source and ban YOU for bringing all this on and making khush's serious switch stuck in the ON position. We all know Khush can be fun, some times, but we have no evidence of YOU ever being fun.. EVER.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 05:06:48 PM
Looks like we have a counter-suit on our hands.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 05:09:00 PM
One can't help but question the prosecution's reading comprehension with the statements she is making. If one reads this thread in order, they will see that I asked to be a lawyer for the case of Deg vs D_Average. Unfortunately, that case was resolved out of court. However, the funhouse legal system assigned me to be a lawyer in this case for the defense. I accepted it since I was also being charged and I don't trust anyone else to handle my defense. If I hadn't been charged and put on the prosecution's side, I'd have been a prosecutor. Blame yourself for that. Since I've been given assigned the task of a defense lawyer and I've been charged, I'm going to do my job.
There again, we see that I'm not the head. I was put into this position by you and BnM. Since you started it, you would be the head or else BnM who assigned me this case.
And as I have said before and still end up having to repeat, this discussion is foolish nonsense that is irrelavent to this trial and case. I've still yet to see the prosecution attempt anything to base their charges on.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stratos on October 12, 2009, 05:09:19 PM
We could start an 'Un-Funhouse' and then have a vote-off similar to Survivor to see who get's banished to the Un-Funhouse.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 05:10:19 PM
You're looking at the sole survivor in that case.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 05:20:15 PM
I shouldn't double post but one last thing. Although GP has finally arrived for this case, we've yet to here anything from the prosecution on their case. First, the prosecution asked for some of the defendents to defend themselves first. Hilarious considering they are supposed to be prosecuted first. Then, the prosecution claimed not to recognize the authority of this court. I don't think Saddam Hussien ever recognized the authority of the International Court either. How did that arguement work out? The prosecution then made implications about one of the defendents with no proof and finally has focused on the defendants lawyer's entertainment value and role in these proceedings. It will be 3:00 in 40 minutes or so. If the prosecution is still unable to make any case or sense by that point, I trust this case will be dismissed and the prosecution will be disbarred.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 05:31:14 PM
I shouldn't double post but one last thing. Although GP has finally arrived for this case, we've yet to here anything from the prosecution on their case. First, the prosecution asked for some of the defendents to defend themselves first. Hilarious considering they are supposed to be prosecuted first. Then, the prosecution claimed not to recognize the authority of this court. I don't think Saddam Hussien ever recognized the authority of the International Court either. How did that arguement work out? The prosecution then made implications about one of the defendents with no proof and finally has focused on the defendants lawyer's entertainment value and role in these proceedings. It will be 3:00 in 40 minutes or so. If the prosecution is still unable to make any case or sense by that point, I trust this case will be dismissed and the prosecution will be disbarred.
Case proven. Boring has proven his own downfall.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Khushrenada on October 12, 2009, 05:53:43 PM
The only thing that has been proven is that it is impossible to comprehend how the prosecution sees this trial. Appearently, the case is whether I'm boring. Can you say irrelevant?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 06:16:06 PM
Since the "Prosecution" has failed to comply to the request of The Court to provide evidence to support the claims that have been brought forth, I have no choice but to move forward with the motion to dismiss this case and negate all the accusations that were made therein.
::gavel::
Case Dismissed
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stratos on October 12, 2009, 07:03:33 PM
Well, that was a let down. I would have thought GP would have put up a better fight.
What's next on "The Judge BnM Show"?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: EasyCure on October 12, 2009, 07:17:26 PM
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 12, 2009, 08:31:45 PM
There sure has been a lot going on in this topic.
Sometimes people have trouble expressing themselves. I didn't want to speak on GoldenPhoenix's behalf, but if I didn't do it, nobody else would have.
I could probably provide evidence for her claims, but it would appear you've already thrown the case out after half a day. That's barely enough time to sleep...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 08:35:00 PM
Sometimes people have trouble expressing themselves. I didn't want to speak on GoldenPhoenix's behalf, but if I didn't do it, nobody else would have.
I could probably provide evidence for her claims, but it would appear you've already thrown the case out after half a day. That's barely enough time to sleep...
Well it is a sexist, mob mentality court, I wouldn't expect anything less. So as far as I see it, it was a success in proving there was a bias from the start.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 08:45:00 PM
Sometimes people have trouble expressing themselves. I didn't want to speak on GoldenPhoenix's behalf, but if I didn't do it, nobody else would have.
I could probably provide evidence for her claims, but it would appear you've already thrown the case out after half a day. That's barely enough time to sleep...
The case was known last wed. and started on friday. Postponed while we waited on the prosecution till saturday, who didn't show up till monday, made excuses not to participate, was given a few hours to show interest in continuing, still didn't provide anything after several hours of delay, case gets thrown out.
96-120 hours ain't enough time to sleep?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 12, 2009, 08:59:41 PM
I meant for me. I didn't know she wasn't going to make the case so I didn't have time to take over.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 09:07:14 PM
You were named as representation in the case back on Friday since you were the only one to step up on her behalf.
If you want, we can re-open the case on Wed. and actual have someone push GP's case since you seem to want to represent her, now that we all know she was incapable of representing herself.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 09:20:38 PM
You were named as representation in the case back on Friday since you were the only one to step up on her behalf.
If you want, we can re-open the case on Wed. and actual have someone push GP's case since you seem to want to represent her, now that we all know she was incapable of representing herself.
You have a conflict of interest, we need someone who doesn't have this issue. I nominate Greg Leahy.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Mop it up on October 12, 2009, 09:25:00 PM
I didn't know of what I was stepping up, I thought I'd just be an expert witness or something. On second thought, if she isn't going to step up here then I don't think I can continue on my own.
I'm sorry GoldenPhoenix, I'm here for you, but only if you're here as well.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 09:45:51 PM
I didn't know of what I was stepping up, I thought I'd just be an expert witness or something. On second thought, if she isn't going to step up here then I don't think I can continue on my own.
I'm sorry GoldenPhoenix, I'm here for you, but only if you're here as well.
That is OK. I mean how could one expect a fair trial when one of the accused is making the final decision? Why should energies be wasted in such a ridiculous trial. I'm sorry but it would have been like Charles Manson making the final decision on his own trial.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: Stogi on October 12, 2009, 09:48:37 PM
Sounds like someones trying real hard to back out...
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 09:52:58 PM
We have a Jury, I just communicate their decision, not make it.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 09:54:22 PM
We have a Jury, I just communicate their decision, not make it.
Unacceptable a judge needs to be impartial and have no personal gain or loss from a case's verdict. Or in this case to ban hammer or to not ban hammer. Not to mention a judge who committed a forum felony and is currently on probation!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 10:00:14 PM
Wow, talk about looking for a way out. Funhouse Court is serious Court with real repercussions....
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: that Baby guy on October 12, 2009, 10:00:54 PM
Sheesh, I just came in here to object based on the judge not being impartial to all bias. The issue is simple: This court is hearing the case of GoldenPhoenix vs. The Funhouse. That's the abbreviated name.
To put it simply, the case is actually "GoldenPhoenix vs. BlackNMild2k1's Political Funhouse." How can the judge be impartial when the very establishment that is defending itself is named after the judge? A judge, I might add, who judiciously has fought to preserve his name and role in said establishment.
This isn't a fair trial. You're turning this court into a mockery. As a moderator of an associated forum, I hereby declare this court in contempt, and rule that the case has been a mistrial.
G A M E O V E R
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 12, 2009, 10:11:09 PM
There was no trial as the prosecution never stepped up.
If it makes you happy, I will find a Judicial replacement for this case.
Maybe someone known to be a Professional(666)
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: GoldenPhoenix vs The Funhouse
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 12, 2009, 10:12:42 PM
Well, that was a let down. I would have thought GP would have put up a better fight.
What's next on "The Judge BnM Show"?
I did too. I know people complained about me being too serious but with the arguements GP made, there wasn't a lot I could do for fun so I ended up getting stuck in serious mode like Easycure put it and hammering away at the arguements. I was waiting for GP to get things going by at least testifying or entering into court her early reasons in this thread for people getting the banhammer. I was expecting many things but they never came and instead we just got a lot of nothing. Oh well. Another case won by Khushrenada: Ace Detective/Attorney. It might not have been as exciting as hoped but I guess I'll take it.
And I guess my services are up for grabs again. So, if you want me represent you, let me know and I'll get back to you. As well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices are hiring so if you think you have the right stuff, send me a resume.
As for what's next, we could have a court trial to determine the winners of Mafia 37: Earthbound Mafia. But maybe it's better just to let things lie there.
Hmmm, looks like it is going to be a long appeal process in the case of GP vs The Funhouse. Well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices have nothing to do with appeal law and therefore will be hitting the bar to celebrate and unwind within the Mafia Forum.
Title: Funhouse Court: Docket #000003
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 13, 2009, 12:53:46 AM
Funhouse Court Docket #000003 Class Action Suit of Players of Mafia XXXVII vs Thatguy: The Case of Mafia: Loserbound? or Easycure vs GoldenPhoenix: The Case of GP's No Fun House?
Which should appear next on the The Funhouse Court Docket?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 13, 2009, 02:14:16 AM
Maybe you should make a poll.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on October 13, 2009, 02:35:28 AM
Well, that was a let down. I would have thought GP would have put up a better fight.
What's next on "The Judge BnM Show"?
I did too. I know people complained about me being too serious but with the arguements GP made, there wasn't a lot I could do for fun so I ended up getting stuck in serious mode like Easycure put it and hammering away at the arguements. I was waiting for GP to get things going by at least testifying or entering into court her early reasons in this thread for people getting the banhammer. I was expecting many things but they never came and instead we just got a lot of nothing. Oh well. Another case won by Khushrenada: Ace Detective/Attorney. It might not have been as exciting as hoped but I guess I'll take it.
And I guess my services are up for grabs again. So, if you want me represent you, let me know and I'll get back to you. As well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices are hiring so if you think you have the right stuff, send me a resume.
As for what's next, we could have a court trial to determine the winners of Mafia 37: Earthbound Mafia. But maybe it's better just to let things lie there.
Hmmm, looks like it is going to be a long appeal process in the case of GP vs The Funhouse. Well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices have nothing to do with appeal law and therefore will be hitting the bar to celebrate and unwind within the Mafia Forum.
Forum Felons on probation who is apart of the accused, presiding as a judge, already made the trial a joke. I don't soil my beautiful hands in such a filthy judicial system run by a felon judge with a defense attorney who kills innocent people for sport in mafia games!
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 13, 2009, 02:50:42 AM
Innocent till proven guilty. your failed accusation fall deafly upon the ears of the innocent.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 15, 2009, 09:52:02 PM
I want to see a resolution to the Earthbound game.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: EasyCure on October 15, 2009, 10:04:06 PM
Title: Funhouse Court: Docket #000003; Players of Mafia XXXVII vs Thatguy
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 15, 2009, 10:55:51 PM
With overwhelming support for option #1 (1 vote from Maxi), Friday Oct. 16th will see the Funhouse Court proceed with item #3 on the Docket (Docket #000003); Class Action Suit of Players of Mafia XXXVII vs Thatguy - The Case of Mafia: Loserbound
or if someone has a better title for the case (since I know nothing of it), I'm all ears.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: that Baby guy on October 15, 2009, 10:56:50 PM
Next Monday? We can start whenever.
Of course, Maxi won that game, so it makes little sense. He's on the prosecution and defense?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 15, 2009, 10:58:14 PM
Black N Mild I have something I need to do on the 19th. The 20th would work better for me.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000003
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 15, 2009, 11:07:28 PM
Well, that was a let down. I would have thought GP would have put up a better fight.
What's next on "The Judge BnM Show"?
I did too. I know people complained about me being too serious but with the arguements GP made, there wasn't a lot I could do for fun so I ended up getting stuck in serious mode like Easycure put it and hammering away at the arguements. I was waiting for GP to get things going by at least testifying or entering into court her early reasons in this thread for people getting the banhammer. I was expecting many things but they never came and instead we just got a lot of nothing. Oh well. Another case won by Khushrenada: Ace Detective/Attorney. It might not have been as exciting as hoped but I guess I'll take it.
And I guess my services are up for grabs again. So, if you want me represent you, let me know and I'll get back to you. As well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices are hiring so if you think you have the right stuff, send me a resume.
As for what's next, we could have a court trial to determine the winners of Mafia 37: Earthbound Mafia. But maybe it's better just to let things lie there.
Hmmm, looks like it is going to be a long appeal process in the case of GP vs The Funhouse. Well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices have nothing to do with appeal law and therefore will be hitting the bar to celebrate and unwind within the Mafia Forum.
Forum Felons on probation who is apart of the accused, presiding as a judge, already made the trial a joke. I don't soil my beautiful hands in such a filthy judicial system run by a felon judge with a defense attorney who kills innocent people for sport in mafia games!
Oh hey. This thread still exists. Awesome. Oh and besides GP being wrong about Easycure's nationality as pointed out in the brief trail, it should also be noted that in the mafia game in action, I did not target GP or kill her so that ends the arguement of me ALWAYS trying to kill her and also shows that this defense attorney doesn't kill innocent people for sport. In fact, I even stopped a bandwagon against Dasmos who was innocent person on Day 1. And myself, an innocent person, was killed by the mafia. The lies and slander that I have to put up. It's a shame how facts always seem to end up ruining her arguements. No wonder she hates this court. They actually examine facts here.
Let it go Khushrenada. I can't. I need to get that jab in. Why? Why? It wasn't that great to begin with. I don't know. I just want her to finally admit that she made a bloody error. It's never going to happen. She doesn't want to lose face. Let it go. Fine. I guess it is pretty obvious at this point. I just hope she doesn't drag me into another of her misguided insult attempts. You and me both. (This has been a look into the mind of loneliness.)
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Class Action Suit of Players of Mafia XXXVII vs Thatguy
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 15, 2009, 11:54:33 PM
Since Maxi doesn't want to represent the Players of Mafia XXXVII, the courts put in a request for Khushrenada to take up the case on behalf of the Prosecution, since you know more about the Mafia games than probably any other person on this board.
If Khushrenada is willing to accept the case, we can begin as soon as he is ready.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Class Action Suit of Players of Mafia XXXVII vs Thatguy
Post by: Khushrenada on October 16, 2009, 12:10:10 AM
While it is true that mafia law is a speciality of mine, I won't accept this case since I know the details of it and it is kind of flawed. Basically, at the end of the day, there were two parties standing: The townies and the mafia. The vote came down to a tie but it was the way that tie was resolved is how the winner was determined. Therefore, it should be a case of the mafia members vs the townie players left in the game going to court and not vs Thatguy. Obviously, Thatguy would be a key witness in the trial for either side but if the case is going to court, then it is because the court is making the ruling of who wins the game and not the host.
Since I'm invested in the townie side, I do not want to take the case. As well, I believe in host rights. The host should be able to make the ruling and have it stick, end of story. If we start case like this to trial, are we then going to bring up every game where someone has a problem with the winner? Now, if on the other hand, the host was unwilling to make a decision and let the ruling be decided in court, that would be different since he is giving the court the authority of game host. I just thought it was a funny suggestion at the time. If other people are going to pursue, maybe someone else in my firm would take the case but I wouldn't tackle it personally. Ok, this media briefing is over.
Title: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 16, 2009, 12:16:37 AM
Of course, Maxi won that game, so it makes little sense. He's on the prosecution and defense?
Another case settled outside the court?
We are 0 for 3 at this point. But we can start on Fri (tomorrow) or tuesday if you want. Don't matter to me.
We can always move onto the decision for Docket #000004
Easycure vs GoldenPhoenix: The Case of GP's No Fun House? or The Birthers vs Easycure: The Case of Is He Even Eligible To Be President?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: Khushrenada on October 16, 2009, 12:31:33 AM
I'm not sure what you're bolded text is supposed to represent. I mean, if Maxi won, what side of the case was he taking? This is why the case was flawed from the beginning. And I can quote as well.
It's all the Mafia players vs Thatguy right? are you the self appointed legal representation for the prosecution Maxi?
Ta-da! So, why would the winning players be on the prosecution against Thatguy. Seems to me they would be on his defense. This case would be thrown out on many technicalities. Like I said, I know the mafia law. Nothing to be gained.
The court is 1 for 3 at least. The 2nd case did go to court and the defendants found innocent since the prosecution was unable to prove their case. There was no backroom deal there.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 16, 2009, 12:39:37 AM
I know nothing of the case, that's why I was asking. I put it on the docket that way because that's kinda how it was implied. I can't find the post right now, but it's somewhere in this thread.
Either way, Thatguy stated who the winner was, and I could have sworn Maxi was the one that called for the case, therefore putting him on the side of the accusing. Other than that I know nothing about what happened in Mafia XXXVII
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: Khushrenada on October 16, 2009, 12:44:31 AM
And no one ever will. Heh heh heh.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: that Baby guy on October 16, 2009, 12:47:52 AM
There was a Mafia XXXVII?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 16, 2009, 01:07:22 AM
Not according to the Mafia Hall of Fame (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=26288.0) thread.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 16, 2009, 01:19:27 AM
Actually there was a Mafia XXXVII it just hasn't been posted in the thread.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: BeautifulShy on October 16, 2009, 08:10:28 AM
So what cases are up for voting?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: EasyCure on October 16, 2009, 09:48:57 AM
Easycure vs GoldenPhoenix: The Case of GP's No Fun House? or The Birthers vs Easycure: The Case of Is He Even Eligible To Be President?
and you can always add suggestions. Those are just the most recent arguments that I saw. There was also one about Disney Villains and who would win in a fight, but I have to go look at that argument again to see if it needs to go to court.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Deciding Docket #000004
Post by: Stratos on October 16, 2009, 05:28:32 PM
I don't think it was answered satisfactorily. GP kept making irrational statements and I finally dropped it out of frustration.
Maleficent VS Ursula would be well served by a court hearing. It's in the Epic Mickey thread. There is another Disney argument in there as well.
Title: Docket #000004: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 16, 2009, 05:38:51 PM
Funhouse Court: Docket #00004
Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom
Who would represent who in this case?
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom
Post by: Stratos on October 16, 2009, 05:43:56 PM
I'll represent Maleficent unless someone else really wanted to.
Title: Re: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 17, 2009, 04:52:51 PM
