In this case, a lot of people like this thing you don't particularly like.
You mean the Wii U? I'm not sure what you mean by a "lot of people"... apparently a lot of people were disappointed in what they seen of it at E3 (or more accurately what they didn't see).
There are facts and there are opinions. Dissenters of Nintendo's current policies are voicing opinions, just like how people who are praising Nintendo are voicing opinions. In neither case are they fact. But what is a fact is that what was shown at E3 was a huge disappointment to many people. It is also a fact that the Wii is pretty much dead, and has been that way for quite some time. These are facts..... how you interpret them may be opinion.
I just want to know when the non-dissenters think about the declining sales and market share of the Wii and the lackluster performance (in the opinion of many) of E3? What is their answer? Should Nintendo "stay the course" despite all this and make no change in policy whatsoever? I've heard that the definition of insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.... well, the Wii ended up being a casual shovelware system that for most people just collected dust for long stretches of time due to lack of new games. So far nothing about the Wii U looks like it will be any different. What assurances do we have from Nintendo or third parties or anyone that the Wii U isn't going to have software droughts?
I don't want history to repeat itself yet again. We've had software droughts at the end of every Nintendo systems life cycle from the N64 onward. The NES and SNES on the other hand didn't have software droughts. In fact, both the NES and SNES seen new software releases well after the release of their successors. The last NES game was Wario Woods which came out in 1994, I think... This is how it SHOULD BE.
So one can be a dissenter to how Nintendo is running things now yet still be a Nintendo fan. Nintendo has done things right in the past, so that proves they are capable of it. The difference is now the company is under new leadership, and maybe that's what needs to change.