1326
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Why June will kick Sony's ass (speculation)
« on: March 24, 2006, 06:38:09 AM »
Requiem of Darcness aye?!
I challenge you to a duel!
I challenge you to a duel!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
I've always found it odd that Nintendo made a big stink about how if they showed off their controller too soon they would be copied only to then show the controller and nothing else thus giving the competition ample time to copy them. It's like the stuff that was supposed to be kept secret is out in the open and the stuff that's being kept secret is the stuff that should be public knowledge. So I figure the real secret is the use of the controller and it wouldn't really matter if Sony copied the controller provided Nintendo were the ones to make the better games that use it. Sony copied the analog stick but Nintendo clearly made better use of it.
Either that or the remote is a ruse to trick Sony into copying a weird idea and after Sony commits to it Nintendo's going to go "Surprise!" and reveal the REAL controller.
Quote
Originally posted by: Hostile Creation
"New Super Mario Bros sounds like it will be awesome but I personally think it has a really boring look and style."
You also haven't looked at it in several months because you're scared of spoilers. The game looks excellent now.
Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
"Don't worry, Ian--it looks to be 2D."
It looks kind of 2.5D to me. The view is clearly overhead but in some shots they don't quite look like sprites. It's cel-shaded. That right there suggest polygons.
It'll be good to have the 2D gameplay stay alive but I HATE the way polygons look compared to sprites. Sprites is part of the charm. New Super Mario Bros sounds like it will be awesome but I personally think it has a really boring look and style.
Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
I think the N64 benefited from being an "exclusive console." It was different enough from the Playstation that it didn't get many ports so almost every game was made specifically for it. There wasn't as much third party support but overall I would say the third party games it did get were better than most Cube third party games. A lot of people say the Cube's third party support was an improvement. Technically there were probably more games but I think the N64 had better third party games and that's what really matters. The Cube had too many half-assed ports. Now a port can be good sometimes because it's a great game that the userbase wishes they could play. But that's only worthwhile if the port is as accurate and polished as it can be. On the Cube they rarely were. The Rev might benefit from getting less of these ports even if they overall amount of third party releases is lower.
But there's a big issue. The N64 followed the market leader SNES and by default started off as the market leader. It had more momentum and back then Nintendo still had some power in the console market. That might be the reason why third parties made exclusives for it. Since the Rev is following the last place console and interest in Nintendo is very low third parties just might ignore it outright. Plus things have changed in the industry since then. EA and Ubisoft are so huge and they use the strategy of porting games to everything. Back in the N64 days neither third party was quite as powerful and exclusive third parties like Square were the big guys. Multiplatform support is a more popular idea these days and that could put a huge monkeywrench in any plans to be an exclusive console.
Quote
Originally posted by: ViewtifulGamer
Yeah, seriously UB, keep that kind of crap to yourself.
I haven't seen one either (by which I mean kiosk, not Bob's wife "spotting").