Don't know if this has been posted already, because i haven't been on the boards in a few days, but has anybody else seen this unbelievably low 8.8 they gave Zelda. I mean 8.8 isn't too bad, unless you are talking about gamespot, and then it's just atrocious. It's Zelda, and it's amazing, but I guess the graphics were too terrible for them to even enjoy Zelda. I was pissed about the score when I first saw it, but even more pissed when I read their response to people being pissed about the whole thing.
"It's the same damn game we've all been playing for the last 15-odd years. Hey, guess what? You get to go into dungeons...and find items...and put together pieces of heart to make new heart containers. I haven't gotten very far into it, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that Triforce is in the mix at some point.
There's a difference between tradition and ossification, and Nintendo's been content to let this series stay the same for too damn long. What's more, in a lot of ways it's actually getting to be pretty annoying."
Exerpt from
this articleI am going to take a moment here to simply say, Gamespot lick my testicles. Seriously, they do not deserve readers after a response like that. After reading a bunch of the launch game reviews I am confident in saying that Gamespot is extremely biased against Nintendo and they just need to stop covering anything Nintendo on their site. I mean really how do you knock Zelda? It's not like you get this experience very often, so whenever I do get the chance I love it. There is no game in this world more engaging than Zelda, even my brother who plays primarily shooters and sports games picked up Zelda with his Wii and considers it one of the best games ever. I just can't believe that Zelda didn't even make it above 9.0 for an editors choice award. Maybe I shouldn't be this pissed but WTF how do you ream Zelda like that?