5976
Nintendo Gaming / RE:what games
« on: March 22, 2005, 06:59:18 PM »
It's a conspiracy...They're actually researchers and are trying to get info from us FREE OF CHARGE. The bastards..
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
Well put. The first time Iwata said that gaming as it is can't really go any further my initial reaction was "BS. YOU guys can't go any further or are choosing not to. The rest of the industry is doing fine." I think Iwata's confusing the state of the industry with the state of Nintendo.
Quote
Originally posted by: KDR_11k
Also, I question the use of the word hardcore gamer. To me there are three levels of gamers, the casual gamer who plays a game on occassion and barely knows quality, the average gamer who's like us, reads reviews, plays games very often, etc. Then there's the hardcore. That's the kind of people who can rattle down a list of all moves in Street Fighter with their frame counts and weaknesses. The kinds of people who do speedruns with the most insane tricks available, the kind that complains about balancing when the rest of the world didn't even know the game had strategy at all. That's where I'd file Ty. I doubt any hardcore gamer gives a crap about graphics since many of them still play many 2d games. The casual gamer is swayed by advertising, image and licenses, the average gamer usually by media bias and the hardcore will still be playing the same three games ten years from now.
Quote
Originally posted by: Noble~Feather
Edit: You know, Nintendo is making wireless voice chat for the DS... perhaps that will be online. And maybe it will be compatible w/ a few games that go online, and make it Xbox Live-ish.
Quote
Originally posted by: Professional 666
I am teh sticky. This thread will LIVE ON. LIKE ALBERT FROM RESI1.
Quote
Originally posted by: Nosferat2
Thanks Icecold for clearing that up. But can you tell me what "w/e" stands for so that i competely understand your post. Thanks.