Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
I'm just basing that assumption on anything else I've been interested in that has had a boom period where non-fans took a casual interest in something.
Sure you can point to lots fads that have puffed up then dissapeared. MC Hammer, Vanilla Ice, Tamagotchi, Furby, Beanie Babies, Game Gear, Lynx, NES Power Glove, GBA-GCN link cable games, Hoola Hoops, Disco, Bell bottoms, BeeHive hairdo, etc... But there are just as many fads that have instead become common culture. I mean what about Elvis and his music and gyrations? Rock & Roll was essentially non-music back then. It was too different for traditonals to accept. Considered crap, by everyone but teenagers. Yet, now its common culture. What about Pokemon? That certainly was a fad game, back in the day. What about video games in general? Or the Personal Computer? Apple? Ipod? MP3? Nintendo? GameBoy? Anime?
So why are you so glum on Video Games aren't video games as we've known them? I think you're being just a bit to judgemental.
Quote
Of course non-gamers aren't passionate about gaming. By definition they are people not interested in gaming. That's the group Nintendo is trying to grab.
By definition, really? Or do they just like different games? Rather like how there are "Gamers" and then there are "Nintendo gamers". Both are very passionate. I don't see why there can't be a third group who likes video games that are not traditional and become very passionate. No reason why each has to be mutually exclusive. I mean after all if you are a "Gamer" you can also be a "Nintendo gamer" and vice versa. So i'm sure there are plenty of "gamers" who will really be passionate about so called "non-games". And I'm sure there will be "non-gamers" that discover "gaming". So I really don't think its necessary to be quite so dismissive, its win win either way.