151
Nintendo Gaming / Re: Place Yer Bets: 3DS US Launch Price
« on: June 22, 2010, 03:01:14 PM »
I'm sticking with $179.99. Too bad it's not listed.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I would like both screens to be the same size. Wouldn't rumble eat the battery up too quick though?Yeah, it would be a big drain. Not to mention that they tend to break easily, so it's not as simple as replacing a controller.
Can someone put all this tech talk into laymans terms?Yes, please!
I would call those exceptions to the standard GB/DS/PSP portable model, which aren't made for younger children (although I can't find any official statements to claim this).This isn't very encouraging. Kids are a big part of the target demo. If I was a parent would I deal with the hassle of buying my kid one of these and then making sure he doesn't use the 3D feature or do I just not buy him the thing at all?I read in a separate article that the warning is suggested for children 7 and under. I wonder how many parents buy handhelds for children this young, already. Personally I don't think kids this young should have a portable game system in the first place, for a number of reasons.
Hell, as an adult I'm not encouraged by such a warning. Any potential eye damage is a turnoff, even if as an adult I might be fine.
There are portable game systems that are made for children that young, Like Leap Frog's Leapster which has edutainment games.
This isn't very encouraging. Kids are a big part of the target demo. If I was a parent would I deal with the hassle of buying my kid one of these and then making sure he doesn't use the 3D feature or do I just not buy him the thing at all?I read in a separate article that the warning is suggested for children 7 and under. I wonder how many parents buy handhelds for children this young, already. Personally I don't think kids this young should have a portable game system in the first place, for a number of reasons.
Hell, as an adult I'm not encouraged by such a warning. Any potential eye damage is a turnoff, even if as an adult I might be fine.
And GameCube was a failure in most people's eyes. The majority of current Wii gamers won't buy a new console just because it's got better specs. Why abandon this giant 'blue ocean' you've just created all for yourself?You guys are crazy to think Nintendo won't follow the path set by Wii.I think it's crazy to think they will. What has changed since then and now? Nintendo is in 1st place. I don't think anyone is expecting them to "do what Sony did." Nintendo will never launch a $600 console ever. However, Gamecube was a beast. It was more powerful than PS2, comparable to Xbox and still cheaper than both. Is it really hard to believe that Nintendo couldn't do that again? Nintendo selectively chose the components that went into that console. They were efficient, cheap yet powerful.
Then why didn't GameCube get all this 3rd party support? If Nintendo launches a new console, it instantly becomes the 3rd place console in terms of userbase. Even with GameCube Nintendo was in 2nd place for most of the generation and developers/publishers ignored it. It's become a cliche, but the industry will find any reason to ignore a Nintendo console ("it's a kiddy system", "only casual games sell", etc...).Quote3rd parties aren't going to start developing for a new Nintendo console just because "it's a beast".That's oversimplifying and you know it. Being comparable in power essentially allows third parties to port over. The days of one console getting a majority of exclusives are over. There may be a few here and there, but cross platform releases are the best we can hope for. I would think Nintendo has observed that much from the market. Should Nintendo remain market leader, 3rd parties will likely choose it as the lead platform then port to other consoles, granted it's not pathetically underpowered.
You must have missed it when Iwata said "we can't just make a Wii HD and expect it to become another phenomenon, we have to provide a whole new experience", which Reggie then parroted shortly after. Nintendo 2005 - present has all been about expanding the market, always explaining that graphics =/= sales.QuoteOh, and have you not listened to anything said by Nintendo executives since 2005?Yeah, I have. This is the same Nintendo that talked about simplifying controls then added a f*cking analog stick to the DS. Nice job there, Nintendo. I'm glad they did too, because it makes sense. Playing 3D games on DS sucked sweaty nuts without one and the whole simplified controls thing succeeded, not by limiting the number of buttons and doodads, but by seeing someone use motion controls or a touchscreen. However, you're living in a dream world if you think executives of any company aren't just justifying current choices. At the drop of a hat, they will abandon those so-called convictions should their respective company's circumstances change. If the successor of the Wii remote has an analog stick and 4 face buttons, expect Nintendo to PR spin the sh*t out of it. Why? Because they have to.
I used the word incremental as meaning a sustaining innovation but either way to me it means the new device doesn't enable many games that the old one didn't already.
Not to be verbally anal, but what you mean is "vertically aligned". Technically the dpad and the face buttons are already flush (or near), since they protrude from the body at the same height, meaning their surfaces reside in the same plane (your original definition).I hope they switch the position of the analog nub and the d-pad because I like the d-pad to be flush with the other four buttons.
Here is what I meant by the word flush: Having surfaces in the same plane; even.
b. Arranged with adjacent sides, surfaces, or edges close together: a sofa flush against the wall. See This is an old carpentry term. I hve used when I hung dry wall and we would say that the dry wall sheet was flush with the wall meaning it lined up properly with the studs in the wall and did not over lap into door frames, etc. The word has many meanings, sorry for the mix up.
Why would the d-pad be flush? Did one of the other buttons write it a romantic poem?
Your are thinking of the word "blush." I am refering to the d-pad being adjacent to the other four buttons.
Oh. But Wikipedia says that it means to become markedly red in the face and often other areas of the skin from various physiological conditions (such as Carcinoid Syndrome). Do you think 3DS could have Wikipedia built into it?
Here is what I meant by the word flush: Having surfaces in the same plane; even.
b. Arranged with adjacent sides, surfaces, or edges close together: a sofa flush against the wall. See This is an old carpentry term. I hve used when I hung dry wall and we would say that the dry wall sheet was flush with the wall meaning it lined up properly with the studs in the wall and did not over lap into door frames, etc. The word has many meanings, sorry for the mix up.
Yes, FPS is the safe choice when you don't have any unique ideas capable of selling outside the genre. The big-wigs would love to sell the next "GTA" or "WiiSports", but these kinds of new games are limited to very few companies.FPS games sell in the US. So they keep making them. When they stop selling, they'll stop making them or try to turn everyone somewhere else.Man, a whole lot of shooter games went up on stage today, between Microsoft; EA; and Ubisoft. What, is there an active movement now to completely obliterate that genre through overexposure?Not an active movement, but the passive effects of an industry lacking creativity and originality.
And would it kill them to have color in this game?
Man, a whole lot of shooter games went up on stage today, between Microsoft; EA; and Ubisoft. What, is there an active movement now to completely obliterate that genre through overexposure?Not an active movement, but the passive effects of an industry lacking creativity and originality.
And would it kill them to have color in this game?