151
Nintendo Gaming / Re: New Wii Zelda
« on: January 08, 2010, 04:39:47 AM »
All I want out of the next Zelda is MotionPlus swordfighting. That's it. As long as they don't screw that up I'll be happy.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I suspect the PS3/360 would reject rail shooters too.
In October 2009, Demon Souls for PS3 made the top 20
Same goes with Borderlands.
On the HD systems, these types of games tend to sell more than 9000 copies without any more help than EA gave DS:E.
the 80% of the people out there who go out and buy a Wii box are happy with Wii Sports and they don’t really need another game.
DS was disruptive because of the gameplay that the dual screens offered.
Wouldn't it be SO typical of Nintendo to leave out of their documentation some important details about how the remote works so that their games look that much more superior? And if you were a videogame developer and you knew Nintendo was doing this, why wouldn't you not want to support them?
So 3rd parties are trying to disrupt Nintendo's business practices by actively sabotaging their own efforts, not participating at all or only contributing to the competition?
If one day such a thing can actually be proven to be happening, then I hope that all guilty parties do suffer the fate of all the unfortunate companies of the generation for purposely leaving potential money on the table.
I don't actually wish that on them since it's the little people that don't make the decisions that suffer first and the most, but something really needs to change.
Since Ian Sane doesn't visit The Funhouse, this thread comes off as a little mean-spirited.
Expose this and you beat Nintendo. Demostrate REAL motion control used in REAL games instead of just glorified tech demos and stupid wagglefests and make sure the general public knows this and you beat Nintendo. You demonstrate this and you create disillusioned Wii owners. You show them what motion control is truly capable of and the Wii looks like half-baked lamesauce.
Does anybody else think that the use of "epic" has gone too far? I see "epic fail" showing up in a lot of TV shows; even House's most recent episode is titled that. Despite the amazing art shown for this game, the name just sounds dumb to me. Epic is no longer epic.