63
« on: August 05, 2003, 04:30:26 PM »
You guys bring up a lot of good points, and I'm gonna try to hit the big ones.
I think that for WW2, Link and Tetra/Zelda will come to some new land that was created by the seeds of the Deku Tree. If this is true, you can bet that their new foe will most likely be some spirit who had dwelt there for centuries since Hyrule was first flooded. He'll abduct something/someone and Link must retrieve it/him/her or lift some curse from the land. It's true that there have been successful games without Ganon, but how many people want to face another Majora's Mask? I think that though the games without Ganon have been good, the best ones had Ganon. This leads me to my next point:How many Zelda games have not had the Master Sword? (That's an honest question, I haven't played all of the games.) In order for Link to get the Master Sword back, he'll have to return to Hyrule and pull out the sword. This will most likely resurrect Ganon, who will reveal that the entire quest up to this point was a trick so that he could be revived.
On minor notes:
1) I agree that Termina would look good cel shaded, but I don't want to go back there in a new game, remake or not.
2) I think that if WW2 is truly a sequel, characters such as the Rito brought back to further recreate the connection.
3) I like the theory that Link's Awakening takes place after WW. Maybe it even comes after WW2 and bridges to the next game.
4) I think that WW2 will be fine with this engine, but I don't wanna see a WW3. After this one, I would like to see a new concept with a new engine, and just maybe, those 'real' graphics we all know the GameCube is capable of. (Picture Zelda with the graphics of StarFox Adventures.)