Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Deguello

Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 81
1826
TalkBack / RE: Zelda Four Swords DS Confirmed
« on: July 23, 2004, 12:01:45 PM »
"You're assuming it would be an MMO."

Whenever the word "online" is thrown around like that, you should always assume the worst.

1827
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Resident Evil 4 Discussion
« on: July 23, 2004, 01:16:19 AM »
I say this that upon viewing that trailer over and over.  That guy that grabs Leon by his neck and holds onto his right hand with the gun in it, this tell me 2 things.

A) Obviously these "zombies" Ganado whatever, still have the exectuive functions of their brains...

B) This guy looks REALLY close to that Nemesis guy.

That said... YIKES.

1828
TalkBack / RE: Zelda Four Swords DS Confirmed
« on: July 22, 2004, 10:47:18 PM »
I have a small quibble.

"CN: Any plans for an Online Zelda in the future?"

I would definitely hope not.

1829
General Gaming / RE: Gran Turismo 4 anticipation post
« on: July 19, 2004, 10:08:16 PM »
After F-Zero GX got a slammin' for lack of weapons, there had better be some in GT4, or I might go Tommy Tallarico on you all and say GT4 needs more nudity and peeing and dog poop.

1830
"And Pokemon is severely lacking in that aspect."

I dunno.  The main character is supposed to be... like... you.  Unless you think you have no character.  Heh.


1831
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Official Tales of Symphonia Help Thread
« on: July 19, 2004, 06:44:33 PM »
"Yes. It's just like every other good RPG out there, except with real-time battles."

Which means it is already better.  ZING!

1832
General Gaming / RE: Tales of Symphonia on PS2: English version rumor
« on: July 18, 2004, 10:56:22 PM »
"Namco has already made a PS2 version of it, but SCEA has, at least for now, blocked its American release. They're doing the same thing with Killer 7. "

whenever I think of SCEA's blocks, I always think of when Nintendo did that whole 5-game a year limit on the NES.  Except this is 100 times more evil.

How come Cabela's Big Game Hunter 4, Big Mutha Truckers, and Leisure Suit Larry get a pass on their self-admitted "quality test," yet stuff like SNK fighters, Tales of ANYTHING, and Viewtiful Joe get blocked?

I think its time some companies rethink their priorities, when a corporation will not let them release games they probably worked a year on at the very least in favor of a hunting game which probably took 7 months at the very most.

1833
General Gaming / RE: 1 Million People Are Using Xbox Live
« on: July 18, 2004, 07:34:11 PM »
I can use a similar spin tactic and say that GBA-GC connectivity is wildly popular because I know for a fact more than 3 million games have been sold that use it.

1834
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Memory Card Rip-off
« on: July 18, 2004, 12:00:06 AM »
Isn't the SA:2B "problem" just that it won't show more than 999 blocks left?  You can still save, right?

And to be honest... I'd rather have a small memory card that only cost $15 or so bucks, rather than a huge one for $40, like the PS2 one, that EA stuff would still bloat over.

1835
TalkBack / RE: Activision Acquires Rights to American Chopper
« on: July 17, 2004, 09:43:58 PM »
What exactly would an American Chopper game entail?

1836
General Gaming / RE: 1 Million People Are Using Xbox Live
« on: July 17, 2004, 09:28:49 PM »
"You pay for your subscription when you buy your Live Kit ($100NZD), so they do get profit from this system, and many people, myself included, are happy to pay this fee because the service is a great one and well worth the money. I find it much more forgiving and user friendly than online PC gaming."

No No No, you don't understand.  MS has sunk about $2 billion in Live. From just one year of the alleged 1 million subscribers each hopefully paying $50 (roughly), they'd get $50 million of it back.  I guess that's another $1,950,000,000 to go before any actual profit.

That' not profit.  That's massive losses.  That's zero ROI.  And that's assuming there were one million to start with, each unique, all of them actually paying for Live and not getting it free with some deal.  

1837
Nintendo Gaming / RE: New North American (NPD) Sales Thread
« on: July 17, 2004, 08:57:14 PM »
2D didn't stop Sonic Mega Collection from going over 400,000.  Without ads.

1838
General Gaming / RE: 1 Million People Are Using Xbox Live
« on: July 17, 2004, 12:08:29 AM »
I read that as, "1 million game players are using Xbox Live! for free."

If they were actually using a profit-rendering fee system, I doubt they'd have 1/100th of those numbers.

And I still suspect their numbers, didn't, like 2 months ago MS say they had 750,000 users?  That's a pretty impressive jump if you ask me.

1839
General Gaming / RE: Sony's PSP May Face Games Shortage
« on: July 15, 2004, 07:05:07 PM »
Ohh Ohh I bet I know what the PSP Viewtiful Joe is gonna be.  It all makes sense now.  I bet it will be VJoe 2 PSP.  Whereas by nature the DS Viewtiful Joe must be a new game.

BTW, it is easy to say how many games will launch with something when that something's launch is a good bit aways.  BURN.

1840
Since I'm kinda murky on what an RPG is...  I will challenge Fallout2 with F-Zero GX.


What?

1841
Nintendo Gaming / RE: EBgames "don't open ToS right away"
« on: July 15, 2004, 03:16:32 AM »
How about a ToS tale of woe?  My bro pre-ordered it from EB, as he usually does.  And the pre-order bonus was a weird look from the clerk when asking about those special, special prizes that others seem to be getting.  Man I hate living in the damn sticks.

Edit: Oh and what I think of Tales?  It is truly a treat.  I wish this, along with Mario and Luigi and Megaman Battle Network, was the standard of the genre, instead of those blasted push-button movies some developers pump out.   I find myself looking forward to fights instead of dreading their existance.  Good show, Namco.

1842
General Gaming / RE: Sony's PSP May Face Games Shortage
« on: July 14, 2004, 12:11:03 PM »
Is the PSP getting Viewtiful Joe?  Where did ya hear that?

1843
General Chat / RE:Mr. Quaker: A Sinking Ship
« on: July 12, 2004, 11:20:47 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill
Quote

Originally posted by: Deguello
I is VERY tasty, I say.

Oh...May I have a taste?


You know, you can make a sentence totally disgusting just by adding a heart at the end of it.  

Example:

Oh boy I just cleaned out the catbox today.

1844
NWR Forums Discord / RE: Mods
« on: July 12, 2004, 11:03:20 AM »
You know...  If you have a problem with being banned, I would think the absolute last thing you would want to do and come and say all the mods are of the homosexual persuasion.

but if you want the truth, you were banned because you are are a sm311y l4m3r.  And also suspected of being a North Korean communist.  And an alien.  It's true, I swear.

1845
Nintendo Gaming / RE: "The Trouble With Nintendo"
« on: July 12, 2004, 10:58:14 AM »
"I guess what Nintendo should do is give their critics less to criticize."

And THAT I will agree with.

1846
Nintendo Gaming / RE: "The Trouble With Nintendo"
« on: July 12, 2004, 10:48:39 AM »
"I left a few games out, such as F-Zero GX, because they were not actually made by Nintendo or a second-party... Anyway, the average score for Nintendo games is about 81.26%. I don't see how Nintendo games are reviewed poorly. "

Why did you include Donkey Konga then?  Or Wario World?

1847
Nintendo Gaming / RE:"The Trouble With Nintendo"
« on: July 11, 2004, 06:17:43 PM »
Quote

Well I doubt losing sales because of public misperception is something they "do not have a problem with".


I fail to see that as a problem with Nintendo's image.  I see that as a problem with public misperception.  They DO have a problem with that, but changing their "image" around will accomplish nothing because...

Image is press.  I'll say it again because it bears repeating.  Image is press.  It is not console color.  It is not demo discs.  It is definitely not ads.  It is not Nintendo's magazine, although magazines are a key factor to image, some of them being the press.  (Sidetrack:  Nintendo Power doesn't say anything different from XBN, OXM, PSM, and OPM.  Which begs the question, which is worse?  A magazine wholly owned by a company going "Go Company GO?"  Or a magazine not owned by a company going "Go Company GO?")  Hell there wasn't even an image to speak of until around 1994 or so.  And all the things the press ran about video games were usually things like "Do your kids not get enough exercize?" and "Are videogames turning our children into viloent monsters?" that demonized games in the process.  oh yeah and there were those Senate hearings

Yet when Sony and later Microsoft entered the market with much fanfare, that fanfare came from the press, and some of it probably paid for if you catch my drift.  (I mean Sony has no compunctions with inventing a human being to give their movies good reviews) And I'm usually sure Nintendo doesn't play that kind of press game.  (It would surprise me if they did, and even so, they obviously aren't doing it now, because no usual press firm is just glowing with love over Nintendo nowadays.)  The press is what makes image, and so Sony and Microsoft get great images, one of whom likes to invents human critics and use employees as people "who just saw A Knight's Tale and it was like totally awesome," and the other... well MSNBC.

Hell, if you read what the press had to say about Microsoft and the Xbox in June 2001, I bet you'd do a double-take.  The thing of 2k1's E3 was the GameCube, everybody loved it, while the Xbox had an absolutely terrible showing, with Halo being a glitchy mess.  You would think that the Gamecube would be hot stuff now.  But around August 2k1, it was as if the press (this includes various magazines) did a complete 180 and starts the Cube bashing by calling it a purple kid's toy lunchbox that will have fluffy super funtime games whereas the Xbox is a man's console that has mature games worth playing because mature people play mature games like Halo.  Oh and that the Xbox is 100% All American America.   And I think I know how Microsoft was able to to pull that one off, if you catch my drift again.  By sheer force of press and repetition Nintendo's public perception went down the tubes.  Foolish Nintendo.  They thought all you had to do was have great games.  And I think that perception is something that cannot be fixed with just a demo disc.  They would have to start playing those press games, if you again catch my drift.  And I don't think they can.  And if they can, I don't think they do.  And if they do, I don't think they outbid MS and Sony for Magazine "features."

Cripes this crap I just talked about is happeneing again right now.  With the DS and the PSP.  You have probably seen the magazines and the press going googoo over this bloated piece of machinery even AS bad press is getting released about it.  We never hear about that OR the DS, even though more than twice is known about the DS than the PSP.  It's geeting good press and a good image despite that it is sounding very bad right now.  And I think I know how thats happening too, if you yet again cacth my drift.  And you know... Image is press.

tl;dr  Nintendo doesn't have a problem with their image.  Their image is fine.  They have a problem with public misperception, largely brought upon by the mainstream press.  Which Deguello heavy-handedly implied that Nintendo's competitors do dirty tricks involving lots of money to get favorable press, which then leads to a good image.

1848
General Chat / RE: Mr. Quaker: A Sinking Ship
« on: July 11, 2004, 02:11:29 PM »
Back ON Topic.  Don't you guys think oatmeal with Bananas is like the best subtle flavor you ever tasted.  There were times I would eat nothing but that.  I is VERY tasty, I say.

1849
Nintendo Gaming / RE: "The Trouble With Nintendo"
« on: July 11, 2004, 02:08:54 PM »
Yeah, until he royally screwed up Sega of America.  Chief among his many mistakes was taking EA and Madden head-on, which cost Sega of America wads of cash and ended with zero results.  So he either resigned or got booted, to which then Microsoft picked him up because I dunno, failure builds character, and whatnot.  And there he is today, saying Nintendo is kiddy with the rest of them, as if he were some unique snowflake.

1850
Nintendo Gaming / RE: "The Trouble With Nintendo"
« on: July 11, 2004, 01:46:26 PM »
"One Sony executive said that Nintendo gets the kids when they are 5 and they get them when they are 12, or something to that effect."

Quote Nazi!  You are not quoting a Sony exec.  You are quoting Peter Moore, as a MS exec, flapping his gums in a cheap shot.

And Ian I would agree that it is the general gaming populace's opinion that Nintendo is "kiddy," but the problem is that the general gaming populace hasn't been heard since 1995.  Ever since Forums and message boards popped up where people parrot things they heard from certain loathesome individuals both on- and off-line, the happy constructive general gaming populace's was replaced with people with heavy interest yet low appreciation for videogames bitching about what is wrong with them all the time.

But that wasn't really my point.  My point goes to the ludicrous idea of Nintendo's "image problem."  They have had this negative image stuck to the since they started in this damn business.  It is NOT Nintendo's fault.  And them trying to fix it would ba an artificial change that in reality isn't needed or even called for, except by exectuives of OTHER companies.

Such an artificial change would be reminiscient of what happened to Nickelodeon.  It used to be a kid's network (actual kids network, they thought of themselves that way) that kids loved and certain teenagers loved and most of those had fond memories of when they became adults.  Now they "MTV'd" it up, making it all hip and cool and aimed at a more aged market than kids 3-12.  And they've ruined it.  Sure it might be more popular, but everybody who used to watch Nickelodeon when they were 11 (i.e. everybody, including me) is just totally repulsed by this new network facade.  This wasn't really even called for.  They were doing just fine.  Why the change?

And if you WANT Nintendo to artificially change the "image" that they DO NOT have a problem with, then I will hunt you down, grill you and feed you to a pack of gophers.  Because you will have destroyed something beautiful under the false pretense of making it better.

Pages: 1 ... 72 73 [74] 75 76 ... 81