Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Deguello

Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 81
1801
Nintendo Gaming / RE: TOS Commercial
« on: July 28, 2004, 12:35:19 AM »
"I've seen TV ads for Xenosaga"

That's what sucks about the no-ad thing.  They fronted money for that garbage, but not ToS?  

1802
General Chat / RE: A note about hobbies.
« on: July 28, 2004, 12:22:20 AM »
"Urban Champion"

Haha, yes that's correct.

1803
Nintendo Gaming / RE: New DS Design
« on: July 28, 2004, 12:19:55 AM »
Looks neat-er.

1804
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 27, 2004, 10:39:32 PM »
Sometimes the goal of a teaser is to be as vague as possible.  I mean, the teaser for Half Life 2 was just a picture of a crowbar.  For Zombies Ate My Neighbors, that was my goal.    Usually I find that one image that sums up the game, or sometimes just the theme of the game.  And the first thing I remember about Zombies Ate My Neighbors is...

this.

And hey, what's the big idea for the LucasArts game?  Are you trying to make us nostalgic for when they used to not suck?

1805
General Chat / RE: IGN forfeits its last bit of credibility.
« on: July 27, 2004, 05:25:18 PM »
"As for Nintendo, I dont think they have INNOVATED in a long time."

I have a problem with this sentence.  What is it...?

"I dont think"

Aha!  This part.  They haven't done because I said so.

"Ian you claim that EA's games and Nintendo's are reviewed with a double standard, that if Nintendo doesn't make enough changes they're bashed by reviewers and the opposite for EA."

"it's not in the nature for sports games to have big changes in gameplay"

That's the double standard he's talking about.  IT's like, no matter how similar an EA sports is to the last version, it will always garner 8, 9, (god forbid)10 thereabouts from the reviewers.  Which is great.  No Problem.  Peachy-keen.  Fine and Dandy.  Except how come they always put the tetch on Nintendo's being or for that matter any onther company's being whenever they feel a game is too similar?  There's the double standard.  And to say that it is not the nature of sports games to change is supporting that double standard.  From what I've noticed, it is as if Regular Games, Sports games, and (I am gonna catch holy hell for this) RPG's all get rated by different standards.  For Sports games, it seems to be okay to release a barely updated version of a game and chuck it out for $49, AND to take the unupdated version and slap a college license on it and BAM, new game, which the reviewers have no problem with.  If it is a good game, hey that's great!  But when they escape the scrutiny put down on other games, it becomes a problem.  RPGs, heh, you can release a game that has ZERO gameplay at all, or if not absolutely none, a sports-game style update of a pre-existing battle engine, and still get 9's for something as superflous as the game's story.  What I think is worse about this standard is that it seems to disappear when convenient.  Like if F-Zero GX gets a slammin' for having a "bad story," yet if a game has something that can be considered an "RPG quality" story, no mention and no praise.  However, in reverse, if you call an RPG out for being a crap game despite its text and by rating it against the standard that is used for other games, be prepared to get flamed.

Double standards are bad things.

1806
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 27, 2004, 04:30:13 PM »
Oh Really?  You like it?  Wow.

Alright then.  I have made another, for StarTropics 2: Zoda's Revenge.

Was it a Cat I saw?

1807
General Chat / RE: A note about hobbies.
« on: July 26, 2004, 10:12:56 PM »
Nope.  Not a thing about climbing.  What happens in that picture is what happens when you defeat your opponent in the game in question.  And it all falls on top of you, the supposed victor.  It may LOOK like confetti, but I believe it is, in fact, garbage.

1808
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 26, 2004, 03:29:39 AM »
Uninvited was pretty easy, although it is a little small and I think I may have used a copyrighted image, although it doesn't say so.

Anyway, here.

1809
General Chat / RE: A note about hobbies.
« on: July 26, 2004, 02:58:38 AM »
For the rest of the requests.

Kid Icarus - I'm tempted.  I really am.  But I have the same idea as that other fake Kid Icarus teaser that's floating around out there.  A single feather against a white background.  I'll think about it some more.

Giana Sisters-  I'll pass on this one too, sorry.

One Must Fall- Now here's an interesting one, but I must realize my limits.  I don't know if I can DO One Must Fall.  I'll think about it some more.

The Dating Sim Fighter-  Hahah Alright... But isn't it enough of a fan creation without my help?  Heh.

1810
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 26, 2004, 02:38:30 AM »
I just cannot stop myself!  Here I have a pretty easy teaser idea that would really make a cool print ad.

Have at it.

1811
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 26, 2004, 12:51:54 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: mouse_clicker
I don't know anything about Popful Mail, either, but that's one awesome looking piece of work, Deguello. I especially like how the letts are offset, very nice touch.


Whew!  I was hoping somebody would notice that and not think I was dyslexic.

1812
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 25, 2004, 11:47:45 PM »
Alright, since I knew absolutely zero about Popful Mail to begin with and only had fansites, screenshots, and reader reviews to get material ideas from, I think this is the best I can come up with...

Here goes nothing.

1813
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 25, 2004, 10:21:40 PM »
Ice Climber was surprisingly easy to do.

Enjoy!

Popful Mail is still taking me a little bit, but I have another mystery treat.  IT's a little bit smaller, but that's ok.  Normally I do these for games I like.  I'm doing this one for a game I loathe.  Have Fun guessing.

Mystery!

1814
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Who here's interested in Geist?
« on: July 25, 2004, 04:09:19 AM »
It saddens some undesirable elemts on this here internet don't like Geist because "It looks like crap."

Gameplay is lost on some.

1815
General Chat / RE:A note about hobbies.
« on: July 25, 2004, 03:29:12 AM »
I finished M_C's request.  Mappyland was a bit tough, but Popful Mail is gonna take a little bit.  So obsucre, barely anybody knows about it, even myself.

M_C's request.

1816
General Chat / RE: A note about hobbies.
« on: July 25, 2004, 12:23:07 AM »
Yep, Star Tropics.  It took me forever to find a picture of an island that looked like that.

And no, not Radiant SilverGun.

1817
General Chat / A note about hobbies.
« on: July 24, 2004, 11:39:35 PM »
Everybody has one.  Some people make trailers for their favorite games.

I am very similar in that regard, but I rather make cool teasers for games I wish they would remake and stuff.

Here I have two.

Image1
Image2

I wanna do requests, but 2 conditions.

1. Has to be something relatively obscure.  I don't want to see Mario and stuff beeing suggested.
2. First, you gotta guess the games these 2 images are for.   Otherwise it wouldn't be very fun, heh.

1818
General Chat / RE: IGN forfeits its last bit of credibility.
« on: July 24, 2004, 03:46:37 PM »
I hate EA because they stick their evil tentacles into some of my favorite companies and then destroy them.

1819
Nintendo Gaming / RE: DS...the end of porting?
« on: July 24, 2004, 03:32:50 PM »
"Listing all the games Nintendo has published isn't the same as games they have developed in house."

I don't remember anybody saying a damn thing about developing anything in-house.  All I read was "Nintendo releases ports in the place of new games."  Which I literally interpreted to mean "Nintendo releases no new games and instead releases ports of old games."  Which they apparently usually do.  Which they don't.  At all.  Ever.

You know it's interesting.  First it was "Nintendo releases ports instead of new games."  Which is false.  Then it was "Nintendo  releases ports instead of any new Mario games."  Which is also false.  Then it was "Nintendo releases ports inseatd of any new traditional side-scrolling 2D Mario games."  Which is ALSO false.  (Thank you MvDK, your release was rather convenient.)  Now it is "Nintendo releases ports of old games instead of new titles that they have developed in-house."  Which is ALSO FALSE.

It's like I'm trying to prove evolution to a Bob Jones University graduate.  Everytime I think I've gotten a good talking point through with good reason and logic, all of a sudden the rules change.  Next I bet it will be "Nintendo releases ports of old games instead of Traditional 2D sidescrolling Mario/Zelda crossovers while drinking turpentine on Mt. Fuji."

Look I'm tired of this.  You wanna think the GBA is a port machine, fine.  Go ahead.  You are welcome to that opinion, but it is 100% wrong.

1820
Nintendo Gaming / RE: DS...the end of porting?
« on: July 24, 2004, 03:06:53 AM »
"He didn't say they don't release ANY new titles, just that effort is put into ports that might have netted us a new game instead. "

No, he did say that.  See "in place of original titles."  Not "alongside original titles" which would imply the presence of both.  And also since he didn't mention any series whatsoever, it seems to imply that all Nintendo does if they have, in fact, "broken" this rule, is that they release nothing but ports and have no original titles.  At least that's the way I interpreted the frist time I read it.  And then somehow the Mario Advance games got dragged into this as "proof" that Nintendo releases nothing but ports in place of new games.

" Now you're arguing semantics on what is a Mario game. I think you know what he meant."

I know what he meant originally which was

"3. Ports are not released in place of original titles."
"Sadly Nintendo usually breaks all three of these."

Which doesn't even include the words Mario or anything.  Hell that makes it sound like ports of old games (specifically GBA games) should not get in the way of new games.  Which on the GBA, they don't.  In fact, I'll make a list.

GBA Ports Nintendo Published:

SMA
SMA2
SMA3
SMA4
DKC
LTTP
Disney's Magical Quest (Yessir they did publish it.  Just this one, the rest were pubbed by Capcom)
Classic NES (8 games, but I don't think these break his #1 or #2 rules, since they are direct ports and sold at a discount)

New GBA games published by Nintendo:

F-Zero Maximum Velocity
Mario Kart: Super Circuit (Mario!)
Advance Wars
Advance Wars 2
Fire Emblem
Final Fantasy Tactics Advance (... ... ... Well they DID publish it.)
Game and Watch Gallery 4 (Remakes AND old versions!)
Golden Sun
Golden Sun: the Lost Age
Hamtaro: Ham Ham Heartbreak
Hamtaro: Rainbow Rescue (Dunno if it's out over here, but anyways)
Kirby: Nightmare in DreamLand (Remake, full)
Mario and Luigi (Hey look, A Mario game!  Ok it's more of an RPG.  But...)
Mario Golf: Advance Tour (Whaddaya know?  ANOTHER Mario Game!  Alright, I'm grapsing at straws.  However...)
Mario vs. Donkey Kong (BINGO!  It's like you are Mario and you run and jump around... kinda like a Mario platformer.  In fact,   that's just what it is)
Metroid Fusion
Metroid Zero Mission
Pokemon Ruby+Sapphire (I'll be sporting and count this as one.)
Pokemon Pinball: Ruby+Sapphire
Sword of Mana (they published this too.)
Top Gear Rally (Yup uh-huh.  This too)
Wario Land 4 (This plays EEEeerily similar to a Mario Game.  It's almost as if the mechanics are the same!  But if you're gonna be difficult and argue OMG, NOT MARIO, then you will just have to settle for MvDK up there)
Wario Ware Mega Micro Game$

Damn That's pretty one-sided in favor of new games.  So obviously a couple of renovated NES games and some click-and-drag SNES and NES ports isn't stopping the flow of new games  And I didn't even include the upcoming new games like F-Zero GP Legend, F-Zero Climax (recently announced), Kirby: The Amazing Mirror, Mario Pinbal Land (Mario!  Again!), DK:King of Swing, Mario Party Advance (MARIO!  Alright n/m), Hamtaro: Ham Ham Games, Mario Tennis (MarioMarioMarioMarioMario),  Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap.  I'm sure I missed something.  Oh yeah another port will come out soon.  DKC2.  One-sided yet again.

Oh I could be a bitch and say since the GBA is region-free, they that would also include the various import favorites like Kuru Kuru Kururin, Legend of Stafi, Legend of Stafi 2, Custom Robo GX (Could show up here), Tomato Adventure, Magical Vacation.  I don't think I even need to go on.

I dunno, IS Nintendo shamelessly replacing new games with ports of their old ones?  It sure as hell doesn't look like it to me.


1821
Nintendo Gaming / RE: DS...the end of porting?
« on: July 23, 2004, 11:13:50 PM »
"I think he meant standard Mario games, but the GB hasn't seen any of those since Super Mario Land 2."

How is Mario vs. Donkey Kong NOT standard Mario?  It's based on the first game he's ever been in!  And he didn't say "Standard Mario games." He just said "Mario games."  If I were feeling antsy I could include Mario Kart: Super Circuit, WarioWare, and the upcoming Mario Pinball.

BUT he didn't start out saying Mario games.  He just said Nintendo stops all production on new titles to put out ports, which is just absurd.  For every Catalog Nintendo Port you can name on the GBA, there are at least 2 new games.  So obviously they are not releasing ports in lieu of new games.

1822
TalkBack / RE: Zelda Four Swords DS Confirmed
« on: July 23, 2004, 08:58:07 PM »
"I always figured a PSO type game would fit Zelda fairly well. Pick a race (goron/hyrulean/zora/etc.) a class (melee/ranged/caster/etc.) and battle through different levels with your friends picking up loot and snagging experience. Zelda has always had great battle mechanics; they could build on it a lot for online play."

Quit Threatening everybody.

1823
Nintendo Gaming / RE: DS...the end of porting?
« on: July 23, 2004, 08:43:26 PM »
"Myxtika is dead on. When they failed to release a new Mario game on the GBA that broke rule 3. "

Does Mario and Luigi exist in a bubble or something?  WarioLand 4?  Mario Versus Donkey Kong?  And who said anything about Mario?  You said Nintendo.

And Nintendo has released metric tons of original GBA content that gets ignored because it easy to call it a port machine isn't it?  

1824
Podcast Discussion / Radio Trivia Results for 7/24/2004
« on: July 23, 2004, 07:39:39 PM »
ulanshad- 3
MegaByte- 1
notmeagai- 4
MrPanda- 2
Rimmer- 1
FFantasyFX- 1
chiphead- 1
mdm- 2
The_Zapper- 2
Tavir- 1
Klazon- 1

Theme bonus: notmeagai.  Theme answer: Capcom.

Game one: Magical Quest Starring Mickey Mouse
Winner(s): Ulandshad

Question One: What are the mid-boss and final-boss of the Treetops area?
Winner: <MegaByte> bat goon and fat snake

Game Two: Mega Man Battle Network 4
Winner(s): MrPanda

Question Two: Which other big GBA game has a crossover apperance in MegaMan Battle Network 4?
Winner: <MrPanda> Boktai

Game Three: Viewtiful Joe
winner(s): Rimmer, FFantasyFX, ntoemeagai, chiphead, mdm

Question Three: During the credits, which movie is spoofed with the image of Fire Leo?
Winner: Nobody.  Answer: Gladiator

Game Four: MegaMan X3
Winner(s): The_Zapper

Question Four: What's the name of Sigma's final form?
Winner: <Tavir> kaiser sigma

Game Five: Chip 'N' Dale Rescue Rangers
Winner(s): notmeagai, mdm, ulanshad, the_apper, klazon

Question Five: What's the first type of enemy encountered in the game?
A: Robo Dog
Winner: ulanshad

Tiebreaker 1: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 4: Turtles in Time.
Winner: Both Ulanshad and Notmeagai answered correctly.

Tiebreaker 2: Skies of Arcadia: Legends
Winner: Notmeagai.

Overal Victor: Notmeagai  

1825
Nintendo Gaming / RE: DS...the end of porting?
« on: July 23, 2004, 04:56:43 PM »
"3. Ports are not released in place of original titles."

"Sadly Nintendo usually breaks all three of these."

When did Nintendo break this one?

Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 81