I couldn't care less, Treyarch has done a better job with the COD games anyways.
This. By the time Black Ops 2 or whatever their next game is my FPS fatigue should be gone or at least I'd be willing to put in the money and time into their game. Treyarch has built up some favor with me with how they've handled the Wii.
Managed to rent CoDMW3 though just to see what it was like since I'm not buying it and I don't care for it. The same way I didn't care for Modern Warfare 2 after finally playing it I expected it be honest. I really don't like the decisions IW makes with their games. CoD games in general are very similar but there is a actual difference in how the games feel and play depending on which developer makes them. How easy you die, how guns handle, the types of guns they decide to use, etc. A number of somewhat small changes that do add up when taken together.
Treyarch's games are slower paced I feel (in both single player and multiplayer) and they are better for it. Black Ops Wii plays and controls a lot better I feel then Modern Warfare 3 Wii because of this. The pointer controls feel better as a result. The pointer controls don't feel right at all to me in MW3 Wii. I played my copy of Black Ops and the rental of MW3 Wii back to back with a little Goldeneye, Conduit 2 (recently sold it) and Red Steel 2 thrown in. MW3 Wii is the one that didn't feel right to me.
In regard to how the game plays (frame rate (still bad even after the patch I feel as I played before and after it dropped. Even when aren't host the game seems to have issues.), graphics not just popping in, map design, etc) I feel Black Ops Wii has it beat soundly. The Spec Ops mode is better though then Zombies because we only got the one Zombies map on the Wii. If more had been included I'd give that to Black Ops as well.