Gaming Forums => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: Pikkcuber on June 02, 2004, 03:31:19 PM
Title: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Pikkcuber on June 02, 2004, 03:31:19 PM
I got this from ultimategamez.com it seems that nintendo registered some more trademarks but none make much sense, but here they are anyway. COMMANDERPACK COMMANDER MISSION Manebito/Camera Ningen-Copy/Manebito Peach Hime
It said Peach Hime means princess so there's proably some pricness peach game, WOOOOOO. Could nintys new peripheral be the Manebito/Camera or perhaps the Commander Pack. A thing similar to the eyetoy would be crazy but with a nintendo twist.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: meldavid on June 02, 2004, 05:48:15 PM
The Manibito is probably an add-on camera module for the DS and the Ningen-Copy/Manebito is a portable printer.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Infernal Monkey on June 02, 2004, 07:55:09 PM
"MISSION Manebito, confirmed to be in production by NST.
MISSION Manebito (MAN-BITE-OH!) is Nintendo's first attempt at a fully interactive 'adult entertainment' simulator. Starring a full cast of well known Nintendo characters, the game will play like Smash Bros crossed with Wave Race with a hint of Punch-Out!!! and a cheap adult video rented from Blockbuster. The game will recieve a world wide launch on sometime later in the year. Avaliable for Nintendo DS and Atari 7800"
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Nephilim on June 02, 2004, 08:08:03 PM
COMMANDERPACK proberly would be a the package which ds comes in or maybe a alternative name from The advance wars for cube?
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Uncle Rich AiAi on June 02, 2004, 08:34:45 PM
Peach Hime?
A Peach Hime VS Mononoke Hime game?...
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Hybrid Hunter on June 03, 2004, 04:15:47 AM
Yay, more trademarks. Peach looks to finally get her own game!
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Pikkcuber on June 03, 2004, 04:01:28 PM
Peach needs her own game. Im all for a camera that connects to the GC, Nintendo is the master of inovation and they will do something awesome with this. The command pack is hopefully a device similar to DK's bongo drum, in that it connects to a the GC and has an innovative way to play a game. Maybe it goes with a new pilot wings?
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 03, 2004, 04:13:14 PM
Maybe it's a Peach platformer in which you can put your face on Peach... ^_^
<_< >_>
What!?
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on June 03, 2004, 04:23:13 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Bill Maybe it's a Peach platformer in which you can put your face on Peach... ^_^
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Hybrid Hunter on June 03, 2004, 07:39:39 PM
I guess Peach is gonna start targeting the older audiences with Princess Peach's Bikini Beach Bash!!
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: MysticGohan24 on June 03, 2004, 07:43:35 PM
hehe, it'll beat DOA Beach Volley ball XX
Should be intresting, adult themed Peah
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Uncle Rich AiAi on June 03, 2004, 11:41:22 PM
I blame Tecmo for all this.
Lets keep their dignity....
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Ian Sane on June 04, 2004, 07:06:50 AM
This Peach game is actually going to be the big launch title for the N5 because, you know, launching with a Mario supporting character instead of Mario himself worked so well for the Cube. Peach: The Game will only use one button, will take 1 hour to beat, and has no replay value as the disc will destroy itself after you beat the game.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: WallOfDoom on June 04, 2004, 08:04:43 AM
Quote Originally posted by: Ian Sane This Peach game is actually going to be the big launch title for the N5 because, you know, launching with a Mario supporting character instead of Mario himself worked so well for the Cube. Peach: The Game will only use one button, will take 1 hour to beat, and has no replay value as the disc will destroy itself after you beat the game.
LOL! Quite right. Is it just me? Or is nintendo really out of touch with what the people want? Miyamoto keeps spouting stuff like: "We want games to get simpler and simpler" when I want games to get longer and more complex. Do people want endless remakes and rehashes of games that have already been released? Or light-weight games like luigis mansion for launch titles? I for one would like a new mario game for gamecube, one new true mario game per SYSTEM just isn't enough.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Shecky on June 04, 2004, 08:16:29 AM
My guess: The camera will be Nintendo's answer to Sony's Eye Toy
Given the publicity the Eye Toy received around the holidays, I wouldn't be surprised if it sold to expectations, and caught others attention.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: couchmonkey on June 04, 2004, 08:27:18 AM
Personally, I do want games to get simpler, or at least no more complex. I've run out of time for learning complicated new control schemes. I bought Prince of Persia and got Splinter Cell free a few months back, and I just can't be bothered to learn the controls in Splinter Cell. I've put two hours into learning them, and every time I get bored, and forget them by the time I try again. It's probably a major roadblock preventing sales to casual gamers.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 04, 2004, 08:59:01 AM
"Is it just me? Or is nintendo really out of touch with what the people want?"
Please enlighten me to what the people want...Grand Theft Mario? Peach Hardcore Mudwrestling?
It's been a very long time since there was a Ninty title I just plain didn't enjoy...
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Deguello on June 04, 2004, 09:38:03 AM
I was wondering if they were going to do such a thing with the Mario like that. I mean people bitch that a Mario game is just "Save the Princess, get a cake, hurk" and when Nintendo deviates from that norm people want to return to what it was.
I like the deviation, because I really would think a game that starred Princess Peach would be fantastic if I'm thinking what Miyamoto's thinking. Like say, Bowser kidnaps Peach, and then for some reason Mario's not showing up. Boswer, being impatient, decides to take the fight to Mario this time and abandons his castle. And Peach escapes, because well... that's what the game would be.
I see two distinct possibilities for a game like this. Possibly a 3-D/2-D/2.5D Platformer in which you do the levels of a usual Mario game in reverse. They could either make you do the usual increasing difficulty in which the only difference is that you are moving right to left (2D style) or just doing going backwards through 3D representations of the levels from, say Super Mario Brothers 1.
The other possibility is Nintendo doing their classic "let's take unfun genres that have stagnated and make it appeal to people who like gameplay" like they do with RPG's every now and then. Imagine Peach having to sneak out of Bowser's Castle. A stealth game could be done very well as long as they ignore two precedents. Splinter Cell, with it's "OMG they found a footprint you made at the beginning of the level. Please Restart." And Sly Cooper AKA the most boring platformer, ever.
Either possibility is fine, and I believe I am very correct in saying EAD (if my speculation is right) has done weirder games before that turn out to be classics and have elements quickly emulated. And I also believe EAD has never ever made a bad game, and I am including Luigi's Mansion. Haters.
But really, I would like to hear what people already think of the game when they only know the title. It's so insightful.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Ian Sane on June 04, 2004, 09:53:36 AM
"And I also believe EAD has never ever made a bad game, and I am including Luigi's Mansion. Haters."
Luigi's Mansion is not a bad game. It's just a bad choice for a flagship launch title that's expected to sell systems. I tend to show a fair bit of hatred for it mostly because I firmly believe that if Nintendo had developed a much deeper and longer title to launch the Cube with the console would be in a much better position right now. As a flagship title Luigi's Mansion suggested that the Cube was going to be about one-dimensional titles that can be beaten in a weekend that have no replay value. Not exactly a good impression to give people.
Nintendo doesn't really make bad games but they can't promote okay games as great games which is what they did with Luigi's Mansion.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: mouse_clicker on June 04, 2004, 10:13:14 AM
Quote Nintendo doesn't really make bad games but they can't promote okay games as great games which is what they did with Luigi's Mansion.
So Luigi's Mansion's commercials should have said "Yeah, it's alright. I mean, it's not bad, but it's not that good, either- it's okay. You might want to just rent it instead."
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: odifiend on June 04, 2004, 10:22:23 AM
Mouse, Reread what you quoted outloud and it will make more sense.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: mouse_clicker on June 04, 2004, 10:31:56 AM
Now you've just confused me even more.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 04, 2004, 10:46:40 AM
I reread the quote and find the error...Luigi's Mansion WAS a great game... =P
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: odifiend on June 04, 2004, 11:23:51 AM
Ian was saying that Nintendo's launch campaign was so bad that even though it was a decent game they couldn't sell it or hype it even though it had a mario character in it.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on June 04, 2004, 11:39:33 AM
I don't like the fact Luigi's Mansion was the "face" of the GCN U.S. launch, and ended up being the #1 selling launch title.
~~~~~
Don't launch campaigns and launch games go hand-in-hand?
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: mouse_clicker on June 04, 2004, 11:48:36 AM
Actually, Luigi's Mansion sold quite well- most likely only because it was the face of the launch, as Professional said, but it didn't sell poorly.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Ian Sane on June 04, 2004, 12:02:16 PM
"Ian was saying that Nintendo's launch campaign was so bad that even though it was a decent game they couldn't sell it or hype it even though it had a mario character in it."
No I said that with a flagship launch title there's the assumption that the quality is really high and the game's going to last you for a long time. See Halo for example which despite being a few years old is still regularly played. Therefore the launch title has to deliver up to those expectations which Luigi's Mansion did not. And if the big launch title doesn't deliver it gives the console a bad image.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 04, 2004, 12:04:34 PM
"I don't like the fact Luigi's Mansion was the "face" of the GCN U.S. launch, and ended up being the #1 selling launch title."
Wait, if it was the #1 selling launch title then it should have been doing something right...
"See Halo for example which despite being a few years old is still regularly played."
I played it for about two weeks and haven't touched it since... :\
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: odifiend on June 04, 2004, 12:16:15 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Bill "I don't like the fact Luigi's Mansion was the "face" of the GCN U.S. launch, and ended up being the #1 selling launch title."
Wait, if it was the #1 selling launch title then it should have been doing something right...
Monopolizing the launch lineup...
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 04, 2004, 12:29:55 PM
Since when has there been a large launch(in terms of numbers of games) for any Nintendo console? Never...
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: odifiend on June 04, 2004, 12:37:45 PM
All I'm saying is that the second SSB:M was out the door, Luigi's Mansion's status must have changed.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Ian Sane on June 04, 2004, 12:56:13 PM
"Since when has there been a large launch(in terms of numbers of games) for any Nintendo console? Never..."
SNES. Super Mario World, F-Zero, Pilotwings, Sim City, Super Ghouls 'n' Ghosts, Act Raiser, Gradius III, etc. I think Final Fantasy II was even a launch title or at least was close enough. The amount of great games released for that console in 1991 was insane.
And the amount of great titles isn't significant. What's important is that the flagship title be a system seller. As well as Luigi's Mansion sold, few thought it was worth owning a Cube for and it failed to keep up interest for the six month game drought that followed. Nintendo should have launched the Cube with Super Mario Sunshine.
Let's put it this way, when people who just bought a Cube ask what game they should get does anyone suggest Luigi's Mansion?
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Deguello on June 04, 2004, 01:01:07 PM
if they asked in October 2001 I would.
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on June 04, 2004, 01:44:09 PM
I played Luigi's Mansion for 2 days. Haven't played it since.
It's not something I would've recommended as a US$50 purchase at launch.
Mario Sunshine, I'd agree with.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Pikkcuber on June 04, 2004, 06:33:33 PM
I think luigis mansion was a good game not great but either was sunshine, it was just who was starring in it.well getting back on the subject here. That would be cool if peach starred in a stealth game. It would seem out of place at first but then it would be pretty cool. Though i cant see peach holding one guy around the next with a knife to his throat while facing other villians. If it is more of a stealthy game which i doubt it is ninty will think of something.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Shecky on June 04, 2004, 07:52:00 PM
::cough:: *Back on topic*
IGN has a few images that apparently go with the patents, and I'm almost certian now that this is just an 'Eye Toy' type of device.
Not sure what the linking rules are, but the article is titled "Nintendo Plans Stuff" on IGN...
-Shecky
Who is also almost certian that the next post will be on luigi's mansion
Title: RE: Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: odifiend on June 05, 2004, 05:19:49 AM
It would make sense that it's an eyetoy type device because Miyamoto spoke as if that was the only piece of Sony equipment that has ever impressed him.
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: Hybrid Hunter on June 06, 2004, 04:29:04 AM
A camera peripheral would be cool, it'd be even cooler if it connects onto DS as well, so after GCN is gone, we can still use it for DS! Portable camera!
Title: RE:Nintendos new trademarks
Post by: WallOfDoom on June 06, 2004, 09:42:02 AM