Gaming Forums => General Gaming => Topic started by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 03:11:47 AM
Title: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 03:11:47 AM
Sorry, I can't hear you over the free online gaming and superior exclusives.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 03:12:49 AM
Free online gaming, sure. But Xbox 360 has the better exclusives.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 03:17:35 AM
...you must be joking. Halo. Fable. What else?
PS3 has the Uncharted series. God of War. Killzone. The Last of Us. Resistance. Wipeout. 3D Dot Game Heroes. Heavy Rain. Beyond: Two Souls. Demon's Souls. Flower. JOURNEY. Heavenly Sword. Gran Turismo. Infamous 1&2. Katamari. LittleBigPlanet. Metal Gear Solid 4. Pixeljunk Shooter. Rachet & Clank. Valkyria Chronicles.
And yes Unclebob, I have actually played these games.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 03:24:08 AM
I could go into each of those and say why many suck or are over-rated (like LBP, which is a pretty mediocre game that only got fame because it's create-a-level content) or you using games that are not even out yet (Beyond: Two Souls and The Last of Us).
Gears of War is superior to Killzone and Resistance. Forza Motorsport is better than Gran Turismo. Crackdown is better than Infamous.
The PS3 has some good games, but not many good exclusives.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: NWR_insanolord on May 23, 2013, 03:34:39 AM
This is not the topic for Sony vs. Microsoft flame wars. If you want to continue that discussion, I suggest you take it here (http://www.gamefaqs.com).
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 09:10:43 AM
PS3 has the Uncharted series. God of War. Killzone. The Last of Us. Resistance. Wipeout. 3D Dot Game Heroes. Heavy Rain. Beyond: Two Souls. Demon's Souls. Flower. JOURNEY. Heavenly Sword. Gran Turismo. Infamous 1&2. Katamari. LittleBigPlanet. Metal Gear Solid 4. Pixeljunk Shooter. Rachet & Clank. Valkyria Chronicles.
Quote from: Wikipedia
Beyond: Two Souls is an upcoming video game for the PlayStation 3 console, under development by French developer Quantic Dream. It stars actors Willem Dafoe and Ellen Page, and is set for release on 8 October 2013.
Quote from: Wikipedia
The Last of Us is an upcoming action-adventure survival horror video game developed by Naughty Dog for the PlayStation 3 video game console. It was officially revealed on December 10, 2011 during the Spike TV Video Game Awards and is scheduled for a worldwide release on June 14, 2013 as a PlayStation 3 exclusive.[4]
And yes Unclebob, I have actually played these games.
So... are you from the future, or are you a Sony plant with access to games that haven't been released for the general public yet?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 11:23:23 AM
Oops. *shrugs*
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 12:00:30 PM
"Oops", indeed.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: shingi_70 on May 23, 2013, 12:09:21 PM
Who gives a **** nerds. Both had good games which is all that matters. I played both Gears of war 3 and Uncharted 3 at the same time.
so um suck it I guess.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 12:26:02 PM
Wow.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: ShyGuy on May 23, 2013, 12:39:07 PM
360 had RROD. PS3 wins.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: lolmonade on May 23, 2013, 12:48:47 PM
The only thing the Sony & Microsoft console reveals did for me was confirm that I will not be picking up either during their first year available.
I'm more Sony oriented when it comes to their exclusives, but both systems have too many unanswered questions pertaining to used games AND how being disconnected from the internet limits their features.
Funny enough, I find myself grateful in this case that Nintendo is behind the curve if this is where it's headed.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: ThePerm on May 23, 2013, 01:55:24 PM
360 has superior online play and features. PS3 steals your credit card information!
they both do actually... fifa hacks hello!!
Actually, it's not the same. With the PS3, the hackers got the credit card info from Sony's servers. With the FIFA situation, the "hackers" were stealing your credit card info the old fashioned way. They had to already have some of your personal info, then they would call Microsoft and pretend to be you so they could get the rest. You could do that with anything, Xbox Live and the Xbox 360 had nothing to do with it.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 08:07:18 PM
360 has superior online play and features. PS3 steals your credit card information!
they both do actually... fifa hacks hello!!
Actually, it's not the same. With the PS3, the hackers got the credit card info from Sony's servers. With the FIFA situation, the "hackers" were stealing your credit card info the old fashioned way. They had to already have some of your personal info, then they would call Microsoft and pretend to be you so they could get the rest. You could do that with anything, Xbox Live and the Xbox 360 had nothing to do with it.
if you're referring to the anon hack you're failing to see the big picture. the PSN hack was meant to attract attention. in most cases malicious hacking is not done in such an obnoxious manner. that said...http://www.destructoid.com/xbox-live-hacking-is-a-very-real-problem-219646.phtml (http://www.destructoid.com/xbox-live-hacking-is-a-very-real-problem-219646.phtml)
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 08:10:26 PM
Except what the criminal in Anonymous did hurt millions of people and did it because they were bitter douches upset that Sony removed a feature that less than 1% of PS3 owners used (if anything, they should have been mad at George Hotz since his actions caused it). Anonymous hacking PSN just made them look even worse. For every one good thing Anonymous does, they do 3 or 4 bad (and usually cowardly and illegal) things.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 08:45:54 PM
umm... no, sony removed the feature because geo had used it to hack the PS3. He hacked it again to find an exploit to bring it back. all he did really is violate sony's tos and he was sued. that is what prompted the anon hack. a year ago actually he explained to sony engineers how he broke in to the system.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 08:53:26 PM
They would have removed it eventually anyways. But Anon got upset for no reason, they were bitching about Sony removing OtherOS even though almost no one used it. Bottom line, Hotz is the reason millions of PSN owners couldn't access it for a month.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 09:01:17 PM
That has got to be the most bass-akward line of thinking ever. Seriously. TJ, what's your mailing address, I'd like to have a medal made and mailed to you. "Best Worst Train of Thought"
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 09:04:12 PM
What? It's fact. Hotz hacked the PS3 for no reason other than to hack it. Sony removed the feature he used to do it, a feature which almost no one used anyways. In retaliation, a group of criminals hacked PSN and caused millions of people to not be able to play their games online or buy digital games for weeks.
Point A leads to Point B which leads to Point C. Point A is indirectly responsible for Point C.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 09:12:37 PM
Sony released the PS3. Hotz hacked it. Sony removed the feature that Hotz used to hack it. Anonymous got mad, then hacked PSN.
So, Point A, lead to B, which lead to C, then to D. Point A is Indirectly responsible for Point D.
Thanks Sony... It's all your fault for releasing the PS3 to begin with! Bastards.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 09:31:26 PM
What? It's fact. Hotz hacked the PS3 for no reason other than to hack it. Sony removed the feature he used to do it, a feature which almost no one used anyways. In retaliation, a group of criminals hacked PSN and caused millions of people to not be able to play their games online or buy digital games for weeks.
Point A leads to Point B which leads to Point C. Point A is indirectly responsible for Point C.
your missing some points in between, the ones i tried to remind you of
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 09:38:21 PM
No, I just boiled it down to the basics (which are true) rather than go into lengthy detail.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 23, 2013, 10:28:49 PM
Anonymous at large never took credit for the PSN hack. :faust:
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 10:34:16 PM
Anonymous at large never took credit for the PSN hack. :faust:
I saw that as well but we all know Captain Spyke of the hms fallacy is going to be livid over that.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 10:37:53 PM
Because they knew it would piss off a lot of people that support them. The evidence shows it was somebody at least affiliated with them. They obviously did not intend for it to go down the way it did.
poke, im talking to catdrugz.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 10:41:22 PM
this is the internet, it doesn't quite work that way
that said do you have any idea how Anonymous as an organization works?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 23, 2013, 10:42:54 PM
Evidence, you say?
I think it's more realistic to assume it was a group from somewhere like Russia or China looking for credit card numbers.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 10:44:44 PM
Yes I do poke, thats why I said what I said. Maybe I should clarify that it was someone in Anon who did it, but they dont want to take credit (because they know their largest supporters would turn on them)
Uh-huh Super, that's why they made it look like a typical Anon attack and then made sure to give credit for it to Anon?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 10:47:14 PM
For the record Sony was the one who took the servers down to prevent more stolen numbers.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 10:48:01 PM
Somebody associated with the human race hacked PSN.
ALL HUMANS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HACKING PSN.
SONY employees made the PS3 and PSN.
SONY employees are doubly responsible hacking PSN.
Guys, it's simple, A leads to B which adds up to three. Duh.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 10:49:37 PM
Were any of the cards ever used? Or at least attempted? If not, then I wouldn't assume someone other than people who would do such a thing out of spite did it. I dunno all the facts.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 23, 2013, 10:51:30 PM
Nintendo dropped the SNES CD contract in the 90's
NINTENDO BROUGHT DOWN PSN :D
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 23, 2013, 10:52:58 PM
Please show evidence of how this group was affiliated with anon or gave credit to anon.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 10:54:32 PM
Please show evidence of how this group was affiliated with anon or gave credit to anon.
One thing is that when they hacked the servers, they left a file named "Anonymous" with the words "We are Legion" (which is basically their motto, and the name of the documentary made about them).
One of the reasons I don't like Anon? One of their early attacks was going to a support forum for people suffering from epilepsy, and posted JavaScript code and flashing computer animations with the intention of triggering migraine headaches and seizures in photosensitive and pattern-sensitive epileptics.
And Anon did say that PSN attack could have been from one of their sub-groups.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 23, 2013, 11:09:56 PM
Aight that's fair. You really ought to link stuff instead of expecting people to go look for it though.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 11:11:48 PM
Why do the mods get to break all the rules? Talking about religion USED to be a banable offense.
I didn't say anything about religion. "God" doesn't equal religion.
you did reference creationism... just saying
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 11:16:59 PM
Not really. There are those who don't believe in a religious or spiritual "god", but still use the term to define that which can't be explained for the sake of simplicity. It's the less fun version of "A wizard did it."
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 11:18:01 PM
Then why were you QUOTING the Bible (http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/1.htm)?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 11:19:04 PM
I don't think that's a quote. For one thing, it doesn't have quote marks or isn't in one of those handy quote boxes. :D
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 11:21:22 PM
It was clearly a paraphrase of what I linked to.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 23, 2013, 11:21:54 PM
Quote from: the Bible
orange cats only look orange. They actually taste like cat hair.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 11:26:00 PM
Different translations of the Bible exist! Some of them use the plural!
Evidence! (http://biblehub.com/niv/genesis/1.htm)
Still a generic earth though. Still not the same.
That's twice now that you've linked to the major religious text of a major religion. I should ban you for breaking the rule about talking about religion. :D
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 11:42:13 PM
You started it! Draconian fascist!!
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 11:44:24 PM
I didn't start it - God did because he created the heavens and the Earth. A leads to B and all that. Geesh, keep up, man.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 11:47:58 PM
There! You did it again!!
I think it's time to resurrect. . .him. . .
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 23, 2013, 11:49:34 PM
kirbykillerdedede?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: nickmitch on May 23, 2013, 11:52:08 PM
I meant the KingAdmin.
But he works too.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: ShyGuy on May 23, 2013, 11:57:56 PM
Way to ruin the thread, UncleBob. Mods, please lock.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 23, 2013, 11:58:29 PM
oh wait
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: UncleBob on May 24, 2013, 12:01:05 AM
When was this thread not ruined?
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: Oblivion on May 24, 2013, 12:04:41 AM
It was ruined the second I fucked up my wording. Please forgive me. :(
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: oohhboy on May 24, 2013, 07:12:34 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/7dSDg.gif)
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: pokepal148 on May 26, 2013, 07:28:05 PM
i think it's safe to say we should remain calm and...
Fact: The internet would have ceased to exist long ago if it weren't for cats.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 27, 2013, 04:32:33 AM
The internet is filled with cats because dog people go outside
(http://i.imgur.com/qMMgE9B.jpg)
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: shingi_70 on May 27, 2013, 09:41:27 AM
If I can come up with some criticism for Sony it would be that despite having the most diversity in their game line up I feel they don't have a good title that matches the feel of Zelda or Fable. I thought it would have been white Knight Chronicles but that was more JRPG. Than they announced sorcery which had good ideas but needed more variety and bigger worlds.
Title: Re: PS3 vs 360 Fanboy rage
Post by: NWR_insanolord on May 27, 2013, 05:30:11 PM
I think that's what the Ico team's supposed to be doing, they just haven't been able to finish it.
