Nintendo World Report Forums

NWR Interactive => TalkBack => Topic started by: bluelander on May 21, 2013, 09:18:12 PM

Title: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: bluelander on May 21, 2013, 09:18:12 PM

Microsoft revealed their next system, and some staffers talked about their thoughts on it.

http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/roundtable/34295

Regardless of what the masthead on this site reads, almost every staff member at Nintendo World Report still pays attention to Microsoft and Sony. As such, we all chatted about what we thought of Microsoft's Xbox One reveal. You are more than welcome to share your thoughts below as well. We didn't include the semantic discussion of how Call of Duty and Mario games are all the same to certain people. Be thankful for that. Or the discussion over how Alex thinks that the master race of console owners doesn't include an Xbox 360. I don't know; it got weird.

Enjoy the slightly edited and reorganized raw e-mail discussion of how we feel about the Xbox One!

Justin Baker, Staff Writer: Looks like Microsoft has certainly learned from Sony's mistake: they're not only showing us the actual system, they're gutting it on the big screen. All the new hardware looks pretty slick, but it all boils down to how complicated they make Xbox Live. While all this new cloud stuff is great my worry is that it's going to play out in an overly complicated way. That's why I love Nintendo, they may not have as many features but they keep it simple. Also, watching 15 minutes of sports games is reminding me why I wasn't too excited for the new system to begin with.

Dave Mellert, Contributing Editor: The Xbox scheme for numbering systems is dumb.

Carmine Red, Contributing Editor: I'm reminded again that EA isn't bringing their sports games to the Wii U. I'm not a sports gamer, but the more I think about it, the more I think about the Dreamcast and its fate. Is Nintendo being conclusively blocked out of an entire segment of the market here in a way unparalleled to anything they've faced before? The focus on EA sports at MS's presentation certainly has me wondering how to re-align my understanding of MS in this market, and what that means for Nintendo.

I'm also seeing that Microsoft will be leveraging a stable of internal studios and "second party" partners. This will be their weapon against Sony: exclusive self-funded offerings and the marketing power to boot, far greater than what Nintendo offered at the height of their first+second party empire. This is MS, and they've got money to burn, and it shows.

Andy Goergen, Reviews Editor: Wow. Microsoft put on a full hour to demonstrate why I don't care about Xbox anymore.  A bunch of TV features I'll never use (with Kinect!)  followed by an exclusive Call of Duty trailer.

So when does Pikmin 3 come out again?

Neal Ronaghan, Director: I'm pretty sure I'll wind up with all three systems eventually, but right now, I'd peg my PS4 purchase for sometime in 2014, and my Xbox One purchase at "a much later date when I get it for a killer sale and it has games I want."

It's weird, because the way I use my Xbox 360 now (mostly as a Netflix/Hulu/HBO Go/DVD player), a lot of the early stuff spoke to me. It's (assumedly) stronger than Nintendo TVii and probably will be pretty nifty. What still kills me are my total disinterest with most of the game features that they showed.

I'm not buying a $500 (or whatever the price of it is) system to watch Netflix with a new hat. I'd drop $60-ish (like I did) to get a Kinect to use the voice commands for Netflix, but I don't see many people getting an Xbox One to use it for DVDs and Netflix. They have one of the million other devices to use for that.

What keeps coming back to me is that Sony learned from Nintendo's Wii U issues (with the exception of not showing the game console). Their reveal reflected that. Microsoft's reveal seems to be brazenly trying to one-up Nintendo's concepts. SmartGlass seems to be a direct reaction to the GamePad. Their TV/cable integration seems to be their version of Nintendo TVii. EA's unprecedented partnership with Nintendo failed, so hey, why not try that, too? While they will likely best Nintendo at some of those, I don't know why they don't try to more directly compete with Sony, especially since Sony's presentation was three months ago and they could have easily reacted to it. This seemed to be Microsoft stubbornly sticking to its guns, and much like the Wii U crashed and burned, I portend that the One (will that seriously be the shorthand for it? We already have a system called the Xbox. ****, I've even referred to it as the Xbox 1 before!) will 100% go through the same Wii U trials and tribulations. The PS4 might be similarly doomed, but Sony seems to acknowledge the challenge more.

And man oh man, the name Xbox One might be stupider than Wii U. And Wii U is colossally confusing. I hope Microsoft's marketing is up to snuff, or else they'll be confusing consumers for the next several years, especially since the 360 will likely continue to sell well for the rest of the year and carry into, at a minimum, 2014.

Alex Culafi, Contributing Editor: I don't think Ive ever seen such a promising presentation collapse so quickly. It started with some tech that is potentially jaw dropping and some concerns that it may even usurp PS4, and then it ended with a German Shepherd in mo-cap and a commercial for the NFL. I'll likely get a PS4 at launch because its Gaikai stuff and games seem way cooler to me than the One. I sure am interested in seeing what these other crazy exclusives they claim to have are, though.

Connecting it to Nintendo, I think Wii U is in trouble far more severe than I think I gave it credit for. That EA presentation made it clear that Nintendo isn't being ignored -- they're technologically being left behind. I wouldn't be surprised if even 3 years down the line, people start saying "Well, I guess Wii U is technically an 8th generation console". Do games matter above all? Of course, and my love for Nintendo games is why I started writing here. But the anger and frustration I carried in Nintendo at first is slowly but surely turning into actual fear. I doubt this could "Dreamcast" them by the time Wii U gains its sea legs (and it's still easily in the realm of possibility), but thinking the Wii U is going to pull a 3DS at this point might be a bit...delusional.

Carmine: Neal, you also have to remember that there are suggestions that MS will take a page from the smartphone subsidization by carriers. The Xbox one will likely cost $500 unsubsidized, but only $300 with a two-year contract with Xbox Live.

This could be interesting and put immense price pressure on Nintendo to bring down the Wii U sticker price. That would take some real creativity on Nintendo's part that I would be real interested in seeing.

Neal: Those subsidized deals are more expensive, though you're right in that people who couldn't afford $500 up front will be inclined to do them. After all, I'll gladly pay you for a burger tomorrow that I can eat today and etc.

Carmine: Yeah. It's worth keeping in mind that the 360 was outsold in Europe by the PS3. I could be surprised, but when MS thinks mass market, they're probably thinking US and UK. I think what we're also seeing here is the dominance off western-based (US?) developers.

That's another point of difference. Just look at the Japan-centric inroads that Iwata has made for Nintendo, first getting Capcom to bring MH to Nintendo away from Sony platforms, and then maybe even starting up a similar relationship/alliance with Sega based off the most recent Nintendo Direct.

Guillaume Veillette, Radio Free Nintendo Host: I have no doubt that with the sports offerings and the limited Call of Duty exclusivity deal, Microsoft has ensured that the Xbox one will be a hit with the casual mainstream crowd just like the Xbox 360 was. How can Nintendo counter that? I don't know that it can. I can't think of anything that Nintendo can show to get a piece of that market, and I think Microsoft will walk away with North America this gen, easily.

Microsoft hasn't shown a single thing that would cater to my tastes, however. I don't know how big the market I'm a part of is, but Microsoft has just basically ensured my loyalty to Nintendo and, perhaps, Sony.

Neal: Question: Why would anyone who has an Xbox 360 and plays Call of Duty and sports games move to Xbox One this year? I don't see any sort of compelling reason.

Justin: Answer: Because they said the word cloud a bunch, and then talked about really big numbers.

Seriously though, I think they're banking on people wanting to buy a new console the same way a lot of new people buy phones: the new one is out, thus it has to be better. People just seem to accept iterative technology these days.

Jon Lindemann, Radio Free Nintendo Host: Microsoft is super-serving their core North American market. Who can blame them?

The best sports console? Locked up.

A partnership with the ESPN and the NFL for embedded Fantasy Football? Done.

Next-gen Call of Duty game with DLC exclusivity locked up yet again? Check.

Nobody that writes for this site may give a crap about any of these things, but there are tens of millions of people in North America for which those three things are RIGHT up their alley.  And guess what? They probably don't understand why you like "those Mario games" either.

Neal: I get it. I just don't get why folks will go to Xbox One this year as opposed to staying with their 360s. The sports stuff (especially the NFL stuff) is cool, but $500 (or whatever it is) cool?

Tom Malina, European Correspondent: To paraphrase what many (including myself) have been saying on Twitter, I am no closer to knowing why I should be interested in the Xbox One. The shift to making the Xbox a multimedia hub has hit apex with this new system, and as always, I do not care, because I already own more than enough electronic devices that can watch TV, play films/music, browse the web etc, etc. I completely understand why others would appreciate these features, but personally I would have no use for them.

As for games... well, what do I have to go on? The promise of 15 exclusives, including 8 new IPs, is great to hear, of course - it's a shame they decided that it wasn't the venue to show any of those right now.

Some alarming points about the system came to light outside of the reveal event. I'm seeing several reports that the system will utilise some sort of online pass-style system when installing its software, effectively blocking used games unless you are willing to pay an additional fee. That is an enormous issue for me, and I doubt I'm the only one. Plus, no backwards compatibility with 360 games? If I were to buy an Xbox One, there would be at least a handful of 360 exclusives I'd want to catch up with, but it turns out this would not be possible.

Zack Kaplan, Staff Writer: So Xbox One, originally I wasn't interested and now I am even less so. It lets you use Kinect to do stuff, which they showed multiple times, in a row. So I guess that is cool. It has a TV guide, I guess that's nice, I mean my TV already lets me look at what is on and I have TVii which I never use. You can also do many things at once, though I can do that with the GamePad. But the exclusives wow oh wait...

Carmine: This reminds me of a scene from "As Good As It Gets"

Woman: "How do you write people who buy consoles at launch so well?"

Jack Nicholson: "I think of a man. And then I remove all reason and accountability."

...OK, so maybe the movie didn't exactly feature those exact same lines....

And I proudly bought my Wii U at launch, by the way.

Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: paleselan on May 21, 2013, 09:32:35 PM
I have never been less interested in a console.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: ShyGuy on May 21, 2013, 09:41:06 PM
Alex seems like a Debbie Downer.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: LJKKJLCM9 on May 21, 2013, 09:45:42 PM
Is anyone really that surprised with this reveal. Statistics show people use their game systems more for netflix/hulu etc than games. However I see no need for a new system if my current one, and oh yeah my smart tv that doesnt require anything hooked up, already does all that.
Then their target audience is sports and FPS.

Really no surprise and no reason for me to get it.
(Probably be referred to as X1)

THE JACKEL
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 21, 2013, 09:47:06 PM
The Xbox One (not a good name, but better than Xbox 720) looks nice. However, I think it is dumb that you will need an Internet connection and have to register a new game before playing it. It's better than the rumor that you would ALWAYS need an Internet connection to play games, but it's still dumb that you will need to register every new game you buy.


Also, Microsoft missed a BIG chance to stick it to Sony. The fact that the Xbox One won't play Xbox 360 or Xbox Live Arcade games is a huge disappointment, and means Wii U is the only next-gen system with backwards compatibility.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: TrueNerd on May 21, 2013, 10:08:17 PM
The most exciting thing announced today was that it looks like the d-pad will be functional this time. Only took Microsoft 12 years to figure that one out.


If the "potential scenarios" of requiring an internet connection once every 24 hours and effectively killing used games are true, I will never buy the XBONE. Period. Same goes for any other console that thinks things like this are good ideas.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 21, 2013, 10:10:55 PM
I haven't seen any reports of needing a Internet connection once every 24 hours. Phil Harrison flat-out said you just input a one time code, then you can play it forever whenever you want.

And you will be able to sell your game to others, but apparently you will only be able to sell it digitally for the same price as a new copy of the game (so if the game is still $60, you will only be able to sell it for $60 digitally).
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: Adrock on May 21, 2013, 10:14:23 PM
XBONE. Period.
XBONE has a rapey vibe to it.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: TrueNerd on May 21, 2013, 10:21:37 PM
I haven't seen any reports of needing a Internet connection once every 24 hours. Phil Harrison flat-out said you just input a one time code, then you can play it forever whenever you want.

And you will be able to sell your game to others, but apparently you will only be able to sell it digitally for the same price as a new copy of the game (so if the game is still $60, you will only be able to sell it for $60 digitally).


http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-does-require-internet-connection-cant-play-o-509164109 (http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-does-require-internet-connection-cant-play-o-509164109)


Microsoft has since told Polygon that this is just a potential scenario.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: pokepal148 on May 21, 2013, 10:36:59 PM
Microsoft is making sure everybody gets XBONE'd this generation
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: Shaymin on May 21, 2013, 10:40:19 PM
Well, let's look at the positives...

Someone will mod the Xbone's d-pad into a 360 pad for a whomp-ass PC gamepad.
Remedy still exists.
And..
... uh...
... ... that's it.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: xcwarrior on May 21, 2013, 10:45:36 PM
I think the staff thinks how I thought about it.

Interesting stuff, but why upgrade from a Xbox 360 if you have one? All of the big games for the holiday are coming out for both Xbox 360 and PS3. I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I'm going to say by the end of 2014, PS3 and 360 will still be the main consoles.

Yes, you read that correctly. After the 2013 holiday, Xbone and PS4 are going to sell just as well as Wii U is now. Gamers don't want to pay $500-$600 for new consoles when their current consoles can play all the big games. No reason to upgrade unless you have to have the new hotness. Third parties are going to start saying, "Yeah, we like the market size of the 360 and PS3, so we'll stick with that."

The game industry is set for a crash - at least the console one.

And Nintendo is fine. Wii U can have it's year long slow start - 3DS is going to own the holiday thanks to Pokemon X and Y. Nintendo will be rolling in dough.

Edit: And the fact that you have to pay MS more money for each account on the Xbox for one disc that you own, and that you have to do an install key to play the game is a huge bad thing. What about people that don't connect to the internet? There is still like 30% of the gaming community that doesn't. Xbone not even an option for them - but some will buy, be pissed, take it back, and cause a REAL TV media backlash!
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: Ceric on May 21, 2013, 10:57:41 PM
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: Traveller on May 21, 2013, 11:07:20 PM
If I don't have the ability to play offline/share games etc I wont be getting one. If it requires a check every 24 hours or so. What happens in 10 years?


The disks are gonna be worthless, may as well just go digital only.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: Adrock on May 21, 2013, 11:12:19 PM
I'd imagine at the end of Xbox One's life, Microsoft shuts off the online required thing. Or they tell you to **** off. Possibly both?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 21, 2013, 11:13:09 PM
Edit: And the fact that you have to pay MS more money for each account on the Xbox for one disc that you own

Don't know how true it is now since PR for MS keeps contradicting what Phil Harrison said, but Kotaku posted:

"Other users on the console will be able to play that game as well, Harrison said. So you don't need to buy multiple games per family. "With the built-in parental controls of the system it is shared amog the users of the device," he said."
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: broodwars on May 21, 2013, 11:14:37 PM
Might as well re-post this from the Durango Rumors Thread:

"Today's reveal basically ensured that I will not buy an Xbox One (and I was open to the idea after the PS4 Reveal), thus making me interested in the PS4 again.  No backwards compatibility, a mandatory once-every-24 hour "check-in"/"call home" policy, price controls on Second-hand software, mandatory Kinect, the absurd amount of focus on TV integration, their general smug douche-iness on stage today, and their general lack of interesting software just completely turned me off the system.  Looks like this next generation is Sony's to lose...surprisingly."
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 21, 2013, 11:43:21 PM
Interesting stuff, but why upgrade from a Xbox 360 if you have one?
It's not an upgrade if you can't take your 360 games with you.

All of the big games for the holiday are coming out for both Xbox 360 and PS3. I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I'm going to say by the end of 2014, PS3 and 360 will still be the main consoles.
I will go on even bigger limb and say that by 2014 3DS will be bigger than both. It has already overtook PS3 in US.

After the 2013 holiday, Xbone and PS4 are going to sell just as well as Wii U is now.
I think even during 2013 holiday Xbone (x-bone, heh) and PS4 will sell less than Wii U.

What will motivate gamers to buy new consoles?

Destiny? Watch_Dogs? Available on Xbox360, PS3 and Wii U.

What will motivate gamer who was exclusive to other platforms (xbox or wii)? Forza? They didn't cared about Forza this entire gen, why do you this one will move them? Same goes about PS4, by the way, i don't care about Killzone and Infamous why these new installments should motivate me towards buying PS4?

This used games thing... This might take a toll on retailers specialising on gaming only, which will shrink the market considerably either moving game and console sales to universal retailers or into digital space.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on The Xbox One
Post by: LudicrousDa3ve on May 22, 2013, 12:44:01 AM
The presentation was disappointing, and that was before everything about XBox Live authentication, required 'net connection, and always on Kinect got out. No way, no how; I've had enough of MS with the 360.

   What I'd really like to note is EA has since apparently changed their mind on Wii U support. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/21/ea-developing-wii-u-games-after-all (http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/21/ea-developing-wii-u-games-after-all)
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Fjurbanski on May 22, 2013, 01:25:23 AM
One of the worst console reveals ever. 30 minutes in before games are even mentioned. Games were either generic or multiplatform.


TV, TV, TV, TV.


So it's a glorified, motion-controlled DVR with Skype? Big whoop. And COD: Ghosts? One of the least impressive game reveals I've ever seen. And I can't even take my hypothetical copy of COD: Ghosts over to a friend's house to play it on their Xbox One. (And I better not hear anyone complain about the Wii U's name being confusing after this crap)


That being said, it may have been smart for them to get all this crap out of the way so they can focus on games at E3. We'll see how they handle that. But as it is right now... this console isn't even on my radar.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 22, 2013, 01:29:19 AM
And I can't even take my hypothetical copy of COD: Ghosts over to a friend's house to play it on their Xbox One.
Actually you can. Just login as yourself on your friends' Xbox and download the game (i think you on current Xbox you can even skip downloading part if you put the game on flash usb drive or something).
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Fjurbanski on May 22, 2013, 01:56:07 AM
Ok... so I CAN play it at a friend's, because I can link to my account? But I can't just use the disk? I guess that's not horrible. Still annoying and tedious and doesn't make this an attractive product.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 22, 2013, 02:04:34 AM
(And I better not hear anyone complain about the Wii U's name being confusing after this crap)

BINGO. I can't wait to hear everyone who complained about the Wii U name making it sound like an add-on trying to defend the Xbox One's name (especially since many people refer to the original Xbox as the Xbox 1). I have no doubt Xbox fanboys (and Xbox podcasters, like IGN's Podcast Unlocked) will say there is no problem and it will not cause the same confusion.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 22, 2013, 02:09:16 AM
Ok... so I CAN play it at a friend's, because I can link to my account? But I can't just use the disk? I guess that's not horrible.
It's actually pretty neat because this will also save your progress, your XP and achievements and stuff you got while playing on someone else's console.

On the other hand if you want to have different accounts for your kids (for parental controls and such) and want to play the same games with them you will probably have to buy the game twice or thrice, even if you're only playing on one console.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: ShyGuy on May 22, 2013, 02:10:30 AM
So what happens when gamers share their accounts? do they get banned if two different Xones log in with the same account at the same time?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 22, 2013, 02:14:13 AM
and want to play the same games with them you will probably have to buy the game twice or thrice, even if you're only playing on one console.

See my earlier post, where is was already confirmed that multiple accounts on the same system can play a game without having to re-buy it. So if you buy a game and link it to your account, and your kid has their own account on the same system, they can play the game too (for free).
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 22, 2013, 02:19:28 AM
So what happens when gamers share their accounts? do they get banned if two different Xones log in with the same account at the same time?
It's not specific to new Xbox's.

All these accounts' shenanigans are already "been there done that" for PS3/Xbox360 gamers.

Honestly i don't know about restriction on multiple connection to the same accounts on Xbox360, but from what i read PS3 supported five consoles connected to the same account at the same time. I think it's been reduced to three or something.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Fjurbanski on May 22, 2013, 02:20:59 AM
It's actually pretty neat because this will also save your progress, your XP and achievements and stuff you got while playing on someone else's console.


It will for sure? Or are you just assuming? Because I haven't heard of this anywhere.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 22, 2013, 02:27:35 AM
Or are you just assuming?
I'm assuming because it's been working that way on 360 for years now.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Oblivion on May 22, 2013, 02:40:51 AM
It's actually pretty neat because this will also save your progress, your XP and achievements and stuff you got while playing on someone else's console.


It will for sure? Or are you just assuming? Because I haven't heard of this anywhere.


Are you a Nintendo gamer only?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Fjurbanski on May 22, 2013, 02:45:52 AM
Are you a Nintendo gamer only?


Again with this guy. Please try to make at least one post that doesn't make you sound like an ass.


I had forgotten that you could do that with the 360. Because, you know, nobody used it. Because when we wanted to play a game on someone else's system we just took the disk over. I remember we tried to do it once and it took forever and was a total pain.


The reason I doubted you is because lots of news coming out about the xbox one is pointing towards this not being a possibility. At least not without a fee. News is still unclear on all the details though.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Oblivion on May 22, 2013, 03:01:43 AM
Who the **** are you? I was simply asking. WHere the **** did you read malicious intent in my post? I was fucking asking you because generally if someone is a Nintendo only gamer, there are certain things they aren't used to.


The only ass in this thread is you.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Razorkid on May 22, 2013, 05:50:39 AM
People, people! Let's be nice ;D


The presentation was disappointing, and that was before everything about XBox Live authentication, required 'net connection, and always on Kinect got out. No way, no how; I've had enough of MS with the 360.

  What I'd really like to note is EA has since apparently changed their mind on Wii U support. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/21/ea-developing-wii-u-games-after-all (http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/21/ea-developing-wii-u-games-after-all)


This is the real news to connect to Nintendo. Suddenly the WiiU doesn't look like a bad system to invest in after all?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Chad Sexington on May 22, 2013, 07:30:37 AM
I haven't been up on console news and had no idea Microsoft was going to be making an Xbox announcement today.

I woke up kind of late, opened up Chrome, and saw some stuff about "Xbox One."

I swear to you I thought Microsoft was giving the original Xbox a "PS One" style treatment.  I was expecting a extremely slimmed down, sleek looking console with a screen attachment, repackaged with portability in mind.

I was wrong.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Adrock on May 22, 2013, 08:19:57 AM
(And I better not hear anyone complain about the Wii U's name being confusing after this crap)
I mentioned this in the other thread. "Wii U" is confusing for the people Nintendo presumably kept the "Wii" name for. They were conditioned to associate the Wii-branded products with Wii which makes sense until you launch a successor with a similar name. That's the main difference here. The Blue Ocean is an audience Nintendo spent an entire generation chasing and they're the ones who don't get it. Microsoft's demographic is composed primarily of core gamers. "What's an Xbox One? Oh, it's the thing that plays the next Halo."

Yes, it's needlessly complicated. However, the original Xbox hasn't been on the market in years. If Microsoft went from the original Xbox to Xbox One, they would have a problem. We're removed far enough from the original Xbox that this isn't really an issue. Xbox One also doesn't look very much like any previous Xbox whereas Wii U is very reminiscent of Wii.

I'm not saying Xbox One is the best name for a new Xbox or even a good one. For me, it's functional, but I would know what it is no matter what they called it.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: yoshi1001 on May 22, 2013, 08:39:12 AM
To be honest, I was expecting "Xbox 1080" (to emphasize 1080p graphics), or something that didn't involve numbers at all. I'm curious to know what other names they considered but rejected.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: ejamer on May 22, 2013, 08:48:59 AM
I don't think the XBox One name is nearly as bad as many people are making it out to be.


That doesn't mean it's good... but I understand how a marketing team would love the name, and think that the average Joe will be ok with it. Nobody who is in a position to be confused knows or cares about the original XBox anymore, and since that isn't an active product (unlike Wii/Wii U) there won't be in-store confusion to worry about.

If I don't have the ability to play offline/share games etc I wont be getting one. If it requires a check every 24 hours or so. What happens in 10 years?
...


This. A thousand times this.


As someone who still plays his original NES, the thought of leaving MS in control of me accessing my games in the future is terrifying.


Maybe they'll just "disable" online checks at the end of the console lifecycle.  Maybe they'll just decide when it's no longer profitable for them to maintain the service and then kill the whole thing and force you to either upgrade to the next XBox console (if it has backwards compatibility - don't hold your breath) or throw your collection in the trash.


This probably doesn't affect their target market, who want annual updates for sports titles and the latest FPS to play online.  But this presentation made it very clear to me that I'm not part of their target market to begin with.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: KeyBilly on May 22, 2013, 09:28:22 AM
I'm very glad to see the lack of backward compatibility with the PS4 and One.  It is not worth the compromise of sticking to an old architecture, and includes the benefit of cheaper and faster PC ports.  That could benefit all of us.

My reaction to the press conference was boredom.  They showed very little to be excited about, with the focus on media features.  Still, it's a new system and I have no doubt that it will be a good one eventually.  Like the 360, it may have a rough start.  They didn't show much practical use of the Kinect or the new controller, but hopefully both will work seamlessly with Windows 8.  I'd rather buy those than the console.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: ClexYoshi on May 22, 2013, 09:57:25 AM
How are there this many posts in this thread, and yet NOBODY has mentioned that this thing looks like it's one flippable door and some buttons away from looking like the first VCR/Betamax player your parents bought?

At least the comments have gone into the intense debate on how Microsoft has effectively negated almost any reason why you would buy this device over a PC outside of maybe some sort of dynamite exclusive or the honest to god NEED to voice control your television out of laziness of not wanting to use a remote.

For YEARS now, one of the primary arguments pro console gamers used to defend their preference over PC gaming was that they didn't have to deal with Digital Rights Management bullshit getting in the way of lending a game to a friend or keeping you from getting a bit of return on investment if you get a game you honestly are never going to touch again and don't want for your collection. All this multimedia device crap outside of TV TV TV TV [a feature that requires you own a HDMI complient CABLE TV BOX THAT ACCOMPLISHES THIS REGARDLESS OF YOU HAVING AN XBOX ONE] can be achieved by your PC and in a much more elegant fashion than talking to the Kinect... which by the way, weren't Microsoft talking about making a PC compatible Kinect anyway?

with the lack of emphasis on those games that should be the chief moving power behind this behemoth Blu-ray eating 8-track player is really concerning... why could they not hold onto their britches to show this thing at E3 where there'd be more of an impact as you show it off with games?

Hell, they were gonna reveal this thing earlier in April, but they delayed this a month already so they could respond to the Playstation 4, which Sony had WAY the **** more together and actually showed a couple of interesting titles and kept the focus on the GAMES of their GAMING CONSOLE!

Xbox One's focus on 'oh, it's a multimedia device!' reeks really bad of the 3DO. if this were the 90's, we'd be hearing the "Multimedia device" buzzwords be thrown around like crazy. ugh. this really is kinda sad that Microsoft has lost their way and this could really be the beginning of the end, regardless of the Xbox VCR's success or failure.




Maybe I'd consider buying it if it were actually a water cooler as well.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Adrock on May 22, 2013, 10:13:54 AM
Xbox One looks like a Blu Ray player or DVR which I felt was the entire point.

And I was always under the impression that Microsoft entered the gaming market to make it part of a multimedia device. They wanted to stop Sony from taking over the living room. Even Nintendo has strayed from the dedicated gaming console philosophy with Netflix, YouTube, TVii, Miiverse and including a web browser. Home consoles just do so much more than they used to. Unlike 3DO, the technology supports it now.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ceric on May 22, 2013, 10:28:45 AM
The problem with Kinect for PC is Proximity.  The Voice the Items all could be achieved with a typical mic.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: tendoboy1984 on May 22, 2013, 10:39:02 AM
I don't see why people are surprised about Microsoft focusing on multimedia features with the Xbox One. They've been going this route for years. They want the Xbox brand to be the central media device in the living room.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Pixelated Pixies on May 22, 2013, 12:15:37 PM
I have to be honest, neither Nintendo nor Microsoft have made a particularly compelling case for why I should buy their system. As an 'undecided voter', so to speak, I'm definitely leaning towards the PS4. I am, however, open to the possibility of being swayed by any one of the big three.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: KeyBilly on May 22, 2013, 12:51:16 PM
The problem with Kinect for PC is Proximity.  The Voice the Items all could be achieved with a typical mic.

Some people, like me, have PCs hooked up to big screens and do not sit right in front of them.  Still, the new Kinect is supposed to work up close.  We'll have to see how it plays out in the real world.

In terms of the current Kinect, the version for PC use is redesigned to be able to work close ("near mode").  The bigger issue is that the original Kinect PC version is not very high resolution and geared more toward business use, so games were not made for it.  It would make sense for Microsoft to push this new Kinect as tightly integrated with Windows 8, since the interface makes so much more sense now than it did with Windows 7.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: ClexYoshi on May 22, 2013, 05:33:13 PM
[size=78%]And I was always under the impression that Microsoft entered the gaming market to make it part of a multimedia device. They wanted to stop Sony from taking over the living room. Even Nintendo has strayed from the dedicated gaming console philosophy with Netflix, YouTube, TVii, Miiverse and including a web browser. Home consoles just do so much more than they used to. Unlike 3DO, the technology supports it now.[/size]


This is true, but focus of a console has never strayed this far from games is the point I'm getting at. I guess one could argue that Microsoft put on this show much like the Wii U Nintendo direct right before E3 to discuss the miiverse so they didn't have to spend press conference time talking about this sort of stuff.

At the same time though, they took just barely enough time to highlight a couple of teaser trailers for games at this Microsoft thing; Games that they didn't want to show any actual gameplay of. I'm pretty sure we got more than just Forza Motorsport 5 trailer playing in passive for a few seconds in that Miiverse Nintendo direct demonstration last year.

My point is that Microsoft sent a message here that games are the afterthought. Watching TV through this thing is what you want. Watching sporting events with a slight bit of interactivity with your fantasy league stats pinging up like you just got an achievement for Devin Hester getting a punt return is what this device is meant for. ohbythewaythisplaysvideogamesandourtriggersonourcontrollerhaveaforcefeedbacksystem, But back to the sports! EA is all about the sports, just like they're all about putting DRM into console games! oh, and let's have a montage of interview as we walk around a football stadium and sit by our glorified DVR in the locker room! Even the games we ARE going to talk about have to be TV-like or be TV adaptations of games!

THAT is where I'm getting the 3DO vibe from; this obsession with making games be these "it's like interactive movies!" experiences. Indeed, the technology has caught up with the principle a little better and you're not just letting any chucklehead make a video game, but it still just reminds me of that way more than the gradual build-up of features that was the 360.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ian Sane on May 22, 2013, 06:47:37 PM
Looking at the reactions on different gaming sites a common theme I see is "who is this for?"  They went on and on about all this non-gaming doodads but who doesn't already have other devices that can do that?  Always online and locking out used games sure is nice for MS but there is no selling point there for consumers.  But then "who is this for?" has been a question directed at the Wii U as well.

We don't really need a new console generation yet.  I felt that Nintendo needed to catch up to everyone else but that's it.  The obvious improvement and need for a new console is not there.  But getting us to buy a new system every so many years is the business model and the hell do they want to give that up.  Nintendo has gone with gimmick controllers to justify new hardware.  Microsoft has gone with multimedia funcationality and, even though Sony seems the most promising right now, they went all nuts about social media in their presentation.  They can't just show us some games that look out-of-this-world compared to the previous gen and immediately sell us on the need for a new console like they could before (and they struggled enough with this last gen).  So the question "who is this for?" is coming up because none of these companies know who the product is for because they're not even sure WHAT the product is for.  The purpose just isn't there so they come up with any justification they can and they're going more with non-gaming functionality because they can't sell us the need on moderately prettier games.  "Throw whatever you can into it and hopefully the consumers will think they need one."

I remember being blown away when I saw a Banzai Bill in a Super Mario World commercial.  "Holy ****!  Look how big that Bullet Bill is!"  Instantly sold me on a Super Nintendo.  They can't do that anymore so they're telling us we need a tablet controller and that we can watch the NFL.  It's like the console market doesn't think they can just sit tight until a true need for a new console comes up.  They have to get their shiny new product out before the other guy's shiny new product takes over the market.  But what will happen now?  Are new consoles that exist solely for the purpose of being new going to sell?  Is the Wii U just the start of a general rejection of a new console generation?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: NWR_insanolord on May 22, 2013, 07:08:42 PM
As a set top box for streaming media and that kind of thing, it looks really cool, but as a game console it leaves a lot to be desired. If I could buy one for $150 with just the media stuff and without the game functionality I probably would.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ceric on May 22, 2013, 07:34:23 PM
$150 sounds about the right price for a high end something just for Media consumption.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: pokepal148 on May 22, 2013, 07:36:27 PM
i have a blueray player under that price point that offers more then what the one has shown
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ceric on May 22, 2013, 07:37:53 PM
i have a blueray player under that price point that offers more then what the one has shown
It plays high end games?
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: pokepal148 on May 22, 2013, 07:39:20 PM
in terms of multimedia.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 22, 2013, 07:45:31 PM
in terms of multimedia.

The Xbox One will have exclusive NFL access. Facebook, Skype, Internet Explorer, Netflix, Xbox Music, ESPN, live TV with voice recognition (including showing what is popular with your friends), Xbox SmartGlass support. If the Xbox One also gets the other media apps the Xbox 360 has, it will be a beast for multimedia.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: yoshi1001 on May 22, 2013, 08:31:42 PM
One place the 24-hour thing could really hurt is if you take your system on vacation (not uncommon on road trips) and your timeshare doesn't have Wi-Fi. That could be an issue. Conventions might have issues too if their game room doesn't have wireless.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: NWR_insanolord on May 22, 2013, 08:40:23 PM
Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how something like the PAX free play room works within these restrictions. My guess is Microsoft will step in with a solution, but for lower profile events that won't be possible.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: nickmitch on May 22, 2013, 08:42:06 PM
I think the case against an always on connection has already been made (http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-diablo-iii-represents-gamings-annoying-future/). Sure, that's one game, but imagine it applying to the whole system.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: TrueNerd on May 23, 2013, 12:11:01 AM
in terms of multimedia.

The Xbox One will have exclusive NFL access. Facebook, Skype, Internet Explorer, Netflix, Xbox Music, ESPN, live TV with voice recognition (including showing what is popular with your friends), Xbox SmartGlass support. If the Xbox One also gets the other media apps the Xbox 360 has, it will be a beast for multimedia.


And it will all be hidden behind a paywall.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: SonofMrPeanut on May 23, 2013, 01:11:19 AM
Interesting observation:  Quantam Conundrum sounds incredibly similar to Quantic Dream, and said game appears to be Microsoft's "Heavy Rain"-styled game (I'm aware Remedy is the developer).


It's also sad that Microsoft's Xbox One was unveiled the same day this happened (http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/21/4350948/nasa-funding-3d-food-printer-pizza).
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: azeke on May 23, 2013, 01:56:05 AM
Interesting observation:  Quantam Conundrum sounds incredibly similar to Quantic Dream, and said game appears to be Microsoft's "Heavy Rain"-styled game (I'm aware Remedy is the developer).
Interesting observation: Quantum Conundrum was already released last year i think.

Remedy game is called Quantum break.

All these names also all sound like Quantum of Solace and Quantum Leap. I wonder why... There's got to be some reason why they sound so similar...
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ceric on May 23, 2013, 08:53:15 AM
Interesting observation:  Quantam Conundrum sounds incredibly similar to Quantic Dream, and said game appears to be Microsoft's "Heavy Rain"-styled game (I'm aware Remedy is the developer).


It's also sad that Microsoft's Xbox One was unveiled the same day this happened (http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/21/4350948/nasa-funding-3d-food-printer-pizza).

That's the more exciting announcement methinks.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: WindyMan on May 23, 2013, 03:48:13 PM
I'm allowed to chime in too, right?  ;)


It strikes me how everyone commenting on the Xbox One reveal, here and elsewhere, are choosing to focus (read: bitch, as gamers are wont to do) on games, when that was not the focus of the event itself. It was all about the hardware, the platform, and the partnerships, with a bit of gaming stuff thrown in there for the mainstream audience that tuned in.


Everyone here knows full well that Microsoft will fill in the games details for us in a few weeks at E3, where the focus is and will always be on games. To that effect, Microsoft, and Sony to a lesser extent, did something extremely smart: They let everyone know in advance what tech they're packing in their boxes for the next-next gen, creating buzz ahead of E3 and riding it into their press conferences, where they can wow folks with games, games, games.


(The way I see it, this could be why Nintendo is skipping a traditional press conference this year; they really don't have anything to attract attention to themselves before the show on the same level as Sony/Microsoft, even if their buzz being forced down our throats.)


Anyhoo, Microsoft got my attention, to the level that I think they've got some hella-impressive hardware in the One (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiFZM4huHi0). The voice and gesture controls and especially the suped-up Kinect seem like a natural progression in gaming tech, to me at least. The idea of multitasking on a console is dubious from a gaming perspective, but for those less involved in gaming--say, those looking for a high-tech upgrade from the Wii, or in a few years the Wii U--might find that attractive. Might.


However, I've no interest in getting a One, or a PS4, or even a Wii U for some time, if at all. At the moment I'm content with PS Plus games on my PS3 and my PC/iPhone to fill in the gaps or kill time, rarely dropping more than $20 on a game lately. Right now the prospect of paying $300/$400/$500 for a new console and at least $60 a game, and another $50/$60 annual subscription (or the danger of the "Nintendo tax" on eShop) service is way, WAY too much to swallow, even if I could semi-afford it all right now. With where I am with life and with gaming right now, I'm happy to sit back and let everything play out, then come in if or when the time is right.


Although, the new Kinect looks sexy enough to consider getting the Windows version when that comes out. I'd love to see what sort of Minority Report stuff could come out of that.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: TJ Spyke on May 23, 2013, 04:04:26 PM
WindyMan has a good point on the games, Microsoft said weeks ago that the full reveal (i.e. games) would be at E3. This was just a teaser for what the system could do.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Pixelated Pixies on May 23, 2013, 04:11:26 PM
Oh boy, would I kill for a Quantum Leap game.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Ian Sane on May 23, 2013, 05:46:21 PM
MS could show Zelda for the One at E3 and I still wouldn't buy it because of the always-online and locked out used games.

Interesting note about Microsoft's presentation.  Didn't they say something about 15 exclusives with 8 being new IP?  Isn't it interesting that they felt the need to indicate that half of them were new franchises?  It's almost like that is some sort of SELLING POINT that one would want to brag about.  Maybe that will get taken into account next time the topic comes up in relation to Nintendo and the apologists come out of the woodwork saying that Nintendo doesn't need to create new IP and that the other guys only do it because their existing IP ain't no good.

Yeah, this presentation was not so much about the games but until relatively recently the idea of a new console's first public reveal treating videogames as an afterthought was unheard of.  Just the fact that they didn't consider the games to be the top priority for the console's first impression is not encouraging to me.  If games were the main focus they probably would have revealed the whole damn system at E3, instead of "saving" that for E3.  The vibe I get is that this is a multimedia center that also plays videogames as opposed to something like the PS2 which was a videogame console that also played DVDs.
Title: Re: The NWR Staff Chimes in on the Xbox One
Post by: Adrock on May 23, 2013, 07:33:12 PM
It's almost like that is some sort of SELLING POINT that one would want to brag about.  Maybe that will get taken into account next time the topic comes up in relation to Nintendo and the apologists come out of the woodwork saying that Nintendo doesn't need to create new IP and that the other guys only do it because their existing IP ain't no good.
1. Bragging about something doesn't make it a selling point.

2. Just because it's new, doesn't mean it will resonate with anyone. What if most of those new IPs Microsoft is trumpeting are Kinect games? Will you still be running your mouth about this?

3. Has anyone said Sony's and Microsoft's IPs weren't good? We've had this discussion 573726272 times. This isn't about quality. Rather, their IPs are generally not as strong as Nintendo's. They don't have anywhere near the history or evergreen status. For the X-millionth time, they're creating because they don't have what Nintendo has. Look at Sony. They tried to make another God of War in Heavenly Sword and it failed to match the former's popularity so they just went back to making God of War games. This is not rocket science, dude. While you keep bemoaning Nintendo's lack of new IPs, Sony and Microsoft continue striving for that kind of stability. These companies only create when they need to. When they don't, we get Super Mario 57, Halo Redux Evolved, and God of War Interquel 3 Ultimate Revenge. That's fine as long as they bring new ideas to the table. They can pump out cookie cutter sequels. They can also blow our mind with original ideas. That has nothing to do with the fact that an IP already exists. It's entirely dependent on what they want to do with it.