Nintendo's upcoming console may be receiving a new name.
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/rumor/29089
Nintendo is reconsidering the name "Wii U" for their next home console, and may change the name of it before the next E3 comes around, according to CVG sources "close to the platform holder."
According to the website, discussions are taking place at the highest corporate level, and that this may be part of an effort to avoid public confusion Nintendo originally experienced with the 3DS. The sources say that a name change is a real possibility, and that Nintendo is putting forth an effort not to make similar mistakes with their next console.
Nintendo presented the Wii U for the first time at E3 2011, which soon resulted in share price dropping to a five year low.
You can't believe how much of a relief it is for me to hear this rumor that Nintendo is considering changing the name of the Wii U. I know its just a rumor, but often times these rumors end up having a grain of truth to them so it is giving me some hope the next console might have an awesome name.Don't get your hopes up. Remember, if they're really considering this it's only to make it clearer to the public that it's its own system and not a Wii add-on. Since Nintendo seems to be otherwise satisfied with the basic premise for the original name they picked, it's pretty safe to assume they won't be straying far from it for any new one. If they do choose to go with a new name, expect it to be along the lines of "WiiYu" or "Yuu". Mark my words.
Wii 2.
Keep the Wii Branding. Adding the number system clearly indicates that it is not just an add-on. Sounds similar to Wii U when trying to speak it, but flows much better.
Wii 2.
Keep the Wii Branding. Adding the number system clearly indicates that it is not just an add-on. Sounds similar to Wii U when trying to speak it, but flows much better.
That's not Nintendo's style. If they do anything along that line, it'll be "Wii Tu".
Nintendo Revolution!
Nintendo Revolution!
NINTENDO FREAKN' REVOLUTION
i hope it has a powerful name that invoke thoughts of panthers and lions running through the forest eating unicorns and then using the rainbow powers they've absorbed from eating the unicorns to grow wings and then pack hunt dragons.
The name doesn't even make sense, unless they are abolishing multiplayer games.It's like Wii (we) from before plus U (you), holding the tablet. Notice the U is even inside of a tablet shape.
I know that, but that's assuming they allow just one tablet per system, which would be a really bad idea. Perhaps I should have rephrased it as not making sense if they enable multiple tablets, as it made sense in their presentation focusing on one tablet. Who's going to want to use a Wiimote when there's a big, new, shiny controller with a screen and everything? If that happened, I'd see it being perceived more as a single player system, and the games would probably reflect that, at least from third-parties. They don't seem to like the Wiimote.The name doesn't even make sense, unless they are abolishing multiplayer games.It's like Wii (we) from before plus U (you), holding the tablet. Notice the U is even inside of a tablet shape.
Well, it was pretty clear that they were only considering single-tablet play at the time. We'll have to see if that's changed.
Wouldn't single tablet play cancel out the Wii (we) part, though?No because you've still got 4 Wii remotes and a TV screen.
Nintendo has made millions off of their game console accessories market (Wiimote, CC Pro,etc), so I would assume that Nintendo would want to sell these Umotes individually to cut production costs and then make a ton of money in the process.That assumes that they aren't so expensive that people would buy them individually and that the system is able to handle them. If Nintendo can clear both of those hurdles, then that becomes an option.
Wouldn't single tablet play cancel out the Wii (we) part, though?No because you've still got 4 Wii remotes and a TV screen.Nintendo has made millions off of their game console accessories market (Wiimote, CC Pro,etc), so I would assume that Nintendo would want to sell these Umotes individually to cut production costs and then make a ton of money in the process.That assumes that they aren't so expensive that people would buy them individually and that the system is able to handle them. If Nintendo can clear both of those hurdles, then that becomes an option.
Nintendo should rename the Wii U to be “Super Wii.” It brings back fond memories of perhaps Nintendo’s best home console ever and the word “Super” gives a sense of empowerment, which the Super Wii would bring to the Wii brand of consoles. It would still have the “Wii” name so that Nintendo can still make money off of the Wii’s popularity and at the same time Nintendo can get more word of mouth because the “Super Wii” is so much easier for the consumer to pronounce and remember.
Nintendo should rename the Wii U to be “Super Wii.” It brings back fond memories of perhaps Nintendo’s best home console ever and the word “Super” gives a sense of empowerment, which the Super Wii would bring to the Wii brand of consoles. It would still have the “Wii” name so that Nintendo can still make money off of the Wii’s popularity and at the same time Nintendo can get more word of mouth because the “Super Wii” is so much easier for the consumer to pronounce and remember.
I would rather they bring back the "NES" brand. The NES and SNES were bar none the best Nintendo systems, and it was only with the N64 that the company went down hill. It is obvious they never should have ditched the brand name. That would be like Sony dropping the Playstation brand in favor of some silly kiddy name like woozle wozzle.
Nintendo should rename the Wii U to be “Super Wii.” It brings back fond memories of perhaps Nintendo’s best home console ever and the word “Super” gives a sense of empowerment, which the Super Wii would bring to the Wii brand of consoles. It would still have the “Wii” name so that Nintendo can still make money off of the Wii’s popularity and at the same time Nintendo can get more word of mouth because the “Super Wii” is so much easier for the consumer to pronounce and remember.
I would rather they bring back the "NES" brand. The NES and SNES were bar none the best Nintendo systems, and it was only with the N64 that the company went down hill. It is obvious they never should have ditched the brand name. That would be like Sony dropping the Playstation brand in favor of some silly kiddy name like woozle wozzle.
This is my point, Chozo. When Nintendo loyalists hear the word "Super" in relation to a Nintendo console then they will be immediatly reminded of the SNES (and possibly the NES) era and think that the quality of Nintendo has returned. Secondly, the causuals will hear the word "Wii" and assume that it is a new Wii console for them to buy non-hard core titles for. It is a win-win situation and it neatraulizes the whole confusing naming scheme of the Wii U.
Nintendo should rename the Wii U to be “Super Wii.” It brings back fond memories of perhaps Nintendo’s best home console ever and the word “Super” gives a sense of empowerment, which the Super Wii would bring to the Wii brand of consoles. It would still have the “Wii” name so that Nintendo can still make money off of the Wii’s popularity and at the same time Nintendo can get more word of mouth because the “Super Wii” is so much easier for the consumer to pronounce and remember.
I would rather they bring back the "NES" brand. The NES and SNES were bar none the best Nintendo systems, and it was only with the N64 that the company went down hill. It is obvious they never should have ditched the brand name. That would be like Sony dropping the Playstation brand in favor of some silly kiddy name like woozle wozzle.
This is my point, Chozo. When Nintendo loyalists hear the word "Super" in relation to a Nintendo console then they will be immediatly reminded of the SNES (and possibly the NES) era and think that the quality of Nintendo has returned. Secondly, the causuals will hear the word "Wii" and assume that it is a new Wii console for them to buy non-hard core titles for. It is a win-win situation and it neatraulizes the whole confusing naming scheme of the Wii U.
That explanation doesn't make sense. At this point, you're pretty much just trolling a Nintendo message board.
How am I trolling?
the Wii is a weak piece of casual bullshit.You're on a Nintendo message board and all you do is trash Nintendo games and consoles. What ARE you even doing here? That's like going to a restaurant and moaning and groaning the whole time, "This is ****!" but continually going there everyday to register your displeasure. See, there's a difference between disliking something and trolling and you sir, are walking the line of trolling.
That explanation doesn't make sense. At this point, you're pretty much just trolling a Nintendo message board.
If anyone is trolling here it is Kytim because he keeps repeating the "super wii" thing over and over again. I was explaining to him why it doesn't work. How am I trolling? I stand by what I said and it does make sense.
You can't make the Wii "super" any more than you can polish a turd. Its just not possible.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiJ9fy1qSFI
You're on a Nintendo message board and all you do is trash Nintendo games and consoles. What ARE you even doing here?
BTW, someone with a pedo bear avatar has no right to hurl accusations of trolling against anyone, imho.Yeah, that doesn't make sense either. Keep smiting me if it makes you feel better but clearly, I'm not the only person who feels this way about your posts.
I'm not the only person who feels this way about your posts.
Nintendo isn't going the change back.
If they don't the WiiU will bomb.
If they don't the WiiU will bomb.
And then Nintendo will ask:
"Why oh why did we not listen to Chozo Ghost?! His incoherent ramblings, finger murmurs and even parts of his brains puke were splattered all over our eyeballs and reason centers. Why oh why did we ask for a handi-wipe?!"
I'm saying it because its what I mean and its a fact.
There is no "change" or "change back." Nintendo is the same Nintendo they've always been, for better or worse.
I don't think the name matters at all for core gamers. They'll play it regardless if it's called *Racist* *Sexist* *Homophobic* * Expletive deleted* BOX (actually they'd prolly play it more). All that matters is if third parties care.
It's all a question of what Nintendo wants to get from this console. Right now, they seem to want it both ways, and I don't think that split focus will serve either audience well if the Wii's lifespan is any indication.
I don't think the name matters at all for core gamers. They'll play it regardless if it's called *Racist* *Sexist* *Homophobic* * Expletive deleted* BOX (actually they'd prolly play it more). All that matters is if third parties care.
Now that was uncalled for.
I'm saying it because its what I mean and its a fact.
Go here (http://pbskids.org/arthur/games/factsopinions/factsopinions.html). When you beat the game, come back and fix your previous post. kthxbie
How about just "U"? Drop the "Wii" part. That suggests a continuation of the Wii naming convention while not being so associated with the Wii to turn off the core.
although at least that isn't slang for penis or pee so I guess its not as bad.
I don't think including "Wii" in the name will be negative. The core base will buy the system based on the games, not the name. The only people who might have a problem are the mindless jocks who mainly play sports games and FPSs and tend to play while drunk/high.
Didn't think about the trademark thing. You're right, that wouldn't work.QuoteI don't think including "Wii" in the name will be negative. The core base will buy the system based on the games, not the name. The only people who might have a problem are the mindless jocks who mainly play sports games and FPSs and tend to play while drunk/high.
Was making the Gamecube look like a purple purse a good idea? Sure you could say "well only idiots would be so superficial" but those idiots made a difference. Nintendo has been fighting an uphill battle to get anyone other than children and casuals to take them seriously for over ten years. Those little things count. Don't give anyone an excuse to ignore a Nintendo system. If there is a possibility of superficial people blowing the system off because its first impression suggests a casual system then it will happen. It must be avoided.
And it isn't like Nintendo will just win everyone over with the games. The Gamecube had some of the absolute best games on its generation and no one gave a ****. They didn't care about Metroid Prime or Pikmin 2 or Wind Waker. They just assumed it was same KIDTENDO system as the N64 and ignored it. Marketing is what gets people to pay attention to your system. Yes, smart people will know what the system offers and make an informed decision but most of the world are idiots. Those idiots can sink a product with a specific audience over the dumbest superficial nonsense.
Nintendo has been fighting an uphill battle to get anyone other than children and casuals to take them seriously for over ten years.
