Post by: MaryJane on September 26, 2006, 02:18:33 PM
O.K so now after seeing it did you also notice that it doesn't say Only for Wii?
The exclusivity of a game is always a big deal, becuase it means if you want to play this bad-ass game you must buy this system. Why isn't it present here?
The possibilities of this game not being exclusive to the Wii are zero to none, since as far as i can remember and i've been closely following this games development, it was developed ground up using only the Wii-mote, so porting it would be quite strange... no?
I don't know, i'm just wondering why it doesn't mentiong the fact that the game is exclusive to the Wii? Is it no longer necessary because of the Wii's uniqueness? Nintendo's balls have gotten so big, they're saying just the fact that it says Wii means it's exclusive because you can't play it this way on any other system?
That kind of makes sense to me... I wonder if that's what they are doing.
Post by: Bill Aurion on September 26, 2006, 02:21:56 PM
Post by: Nick DiMola on September 26, 2006, 02:26:49 PM
Post by: wandering on September 26, 2006, 02:32:01 PM
Quote
Nintendo's balls have gotten so big, they're saying just the fact that it says Wii means it's exclusive because you can't play it this way on any other system?
Yes.
Quote
The "only on" stamp would make this boxart look kind of tacky.
Yes.
Like the boxart, though the blood splatter is a little....misleading, considering there won't be much of the way of blood in the game.
Post by: ShyGuy on September 26, 2006, 02:43:21 PM
Post by: wandering on September 26, 2006, 02:44:35 PM
Post by: Ian Sane on September 26, 2006, 02:51:00 PM
Maybe Nintendo isn't going with the "only for" label to cover their ass. Last gen a lot of "exclusive" Cube games showed up somewhere else. By not drawing attention to exclusives it may be a way to avoid any potential embarrassment. It doesn't look good when an "only for" game is on a competing console's shelf right next to it. Plus pretty much every Wii game is going to be somewhat unique even if technically a game by the same name is on another console.
And if they did the "only for" stuff they couldn't put it on Zelda, could they? That wouldn't look too good.
Post by: MaryJane on September 26, 2006, 03:44:04 PM
that's it, good job everyone. next meeting is on Nov. 21 once you're able to pry your fingers off of the remote. say around 11:59 p.m.
signing off.
good night good luck good trees
Post by: darknight06 on September 26, 2006, 03:56:43 PM
Post by: Arbok on September 26, 2006, 05:11:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: wandering
Trying to evoke Kill Bill, perhaps?
That's what I thought. It's overall very "Reservoir Dog-ish" in its design, which I must say I love.
Post by: SixthAngel on September 26, 2006, 05:18:34 PM
Post by: Hostile Creation on September 26, 2006, 06:11:55 PM
I'll check out the movie Versus.
Post by: Dirk Temporo on September 26, 2006, 07:12:37 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: SixthAngel
The box art reminds me of the movie VERSUS. If you have seen this movie you will see some of the awesome style in the hero with the gun and sword.
I love that movie. The blood on the cover is really misleading though, since the game contains none. (Redundancy lol) At least being rated T will make it more accessible.
Post by: Infernal Monkey on September 27, 2006, 02:55:52 AM
Post by: couchmonkey on September 27, 2006, 04:58:43 AM
Post by: MaryJane on September 27, 2006, 05:25:03 AM
Zelda is a little mundane, but sort of provoking too.
Post by: Rhoq on September 27, 2006, 05:43:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: Dirk Temporo
The blood on the cover is really misleading though, since the game contains none. (Redundancy lol) At least being rated T will make it more accessible.
I could have sworn that Ubisoft originally said that were aiming for an "M" rating. What happened?
Post by: Spak-Spang on September 27, 2006, 05:46:46 AM
Very Nice.
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2006, 07:57:08 AM
You're right. Us Canucks are screwed either way. They put "Best Seller" on Paper Mario when it first came out and thus had the sales figures of ZERO. And Four Swords says "New for 2003" on it in big letters. On the case. That can't be seen on the store shelf anyway because the game came in a box.
Post by: JonLeung on September 27, 2006, 08:18:38 AM
Though you're right, for the couple of games that said "New for 2003"...that was pretty dumb. Considering the GameCube didn't have as much space as the others in many stores, it should be a given that most GameCube games available to buy aren't more than a year old (except for the really popular titles).
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2006, 08:33:51 AM
I meant putting "bestseller" on a case for a game that just came out makes no sense because at that point it isn't a bestseller yet and possibly never will be. In reality it's false advertising. "Bestseller" suggests that the game is worth buying because it's popular. If the game isn't a bestseller but I buy it under the assumption it is then I'm being deceived. Put the text on the case after it does become a bestseller.
Plus it's so damn ugly. Why can't they just put stickers on the shrink wrap instead? After I buy a game the marketing BS is no longer useful and just looks like sh!t. They put stickers on CDs and DVDs wrapping all the time without having it as part of the artwork itself all the time.
Post by: jasonditz on September 27, 2006, 11:51:58 AM
Post by: couchmonkey on September 27, 2006, 01:12:20 PM
Post by: IceCold on September 27, 2006, 01:15:24 PM
Post by: Hostile Creation on September 27, 2006, 02:47:15 PM
Post by: MarioAllStar on September 27, 2006, 03:54:56 PM
