Gaming Forums => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: Kairon on June 18, 2006, 08:34:51 PM
Title: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: Kairon on June 18, 2006, 08:34:51 PM
Boy, I tell ya, shuffling off the yoke of journalistic integrity and fully rational thought is a great feeling.
Hey! Immersion is showing off new rumble tech! Read this!
Quote In addition to allowing stronger, more detailed rumbling effects in video games, Immersion's new technology is lighter (it uses only one motor instead of two), smaller, and draws less power.
...
A heavy recoil effect when firing a rocket launcher, with the feedback trailing off as the rocket propelled into the distance
...
Immersion says that the new rumble technology is ready now, and the company is currently showing off its capabilites to interested parties.
So...think it might make it into the Wii or (god forbid) the PS360?
~Carmine M. Red Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on June 18, 2006, 09:12:06 PM
So it can magically appear in the innovative PS3 controller where Sony will claim it recently figured out how to implement rumble functions without interfering with the advanced nature of the motion sensing.
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: wandering on June 18, 2006, 10:57:49 PM
Quote A heavy recoil effect when firing a rocket launcher, with the feedback trailing off as the rocket propelled into the distance
What does that even mean? Surely it doesn't come close to feeling like real recoil?
Regardless, this sounds pretty cool, and it'd be neat if it were integrated in the wiimote.
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: KDR_11k on June 19, 2006, 03:16:05 AM
Wait, I thought rocket launchers were recoilless?
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: 18 Days on June 19, 2006, 07:17:14 AM
Physics disagrees
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: Renny on June 19, 2006, 08:26:50 AM
They are recoilless, but that isn't next-gen.
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: KDR_11k on June 19, 2006, 09:39:56 AM
18 Days: Wiki disagrees. I assume they mean personell-mounted weapons rather than vehicle-mounted since a vehicle wouldn't experience the same kind of force. An RPG launcher does contain some of the propellant to increase the force on the projectile but I'm sure if they meant RPG they'd have said RPG. There are also recoilless guns (e.g. Panzerfaust) that are sometimes confused with rocket launchers.
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on June 19, 2006, 10:32:51 AM
Rumble that doesn't recreate the recoil of BARRY BURTON'S .44 MAGNUM doesn't impress anyone.
Title: RE:Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: silentbob on June 19, 2006, 03:41:55 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Professional 666 Rumble that doesn't recreate the recoil of BARRY BURTON'S .44 MAGNUM doesn't impress anyone.
Title: RE: Completely Baseless Rumble Technology Speculation
Post by: Renny on June 19, 2006, 04:20:04 PM
I thought the Panzerfaust and Bazooka both had a rocket stage after the initial propulsion out of the tube. Or are they simply explosive-launched versions of the PIAT?
