Nintendo World Report Forums

Gaming Forums => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: Mario on June 07, 2006, 03:54:45 AM

Title: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Mario on June 07, 2006, 03:54:45 AM
http://www.famitsu.com/game/news/2006/06/07/103,1149672727,54492,0,0.html

Nintendo apparently just held a meeting or something, where they announced Pokemon Battle Revolution for Wii. It will have connectivity with the DS Diamond/Pearl and be released a few months after. Looks like another Stadium from the one pic currently available, i'm happy that they haven't attempted another generic RPG with this (hopefully).



Looks great! Pikachu looks a bit different but the style is definitely interesting  
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Dasmos on June 07, 2006, 04:20:50 AM
They look shiny, these PKMN must be made of plastic!
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 07, 2006, 05:04:07 AM
SO SHINY!  But I don't want another Stadium game...
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 07, 2006, 05:19:06 AM
Like Mario Galaxy... maybe a little toooo shiny.  
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 07, 2006, 05:24:36 AM
If this is a stadium game I won't mind as long as they do it up right.  Pokemon Stadium 2 on the N64 was an awesome pokemon companion with great organization features.  I wouldn't mind that as long as something more substantial is in the works.

Also, I wish I had a firm translation of what I'm looking at so I could put it up here...
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: cubist on June 07, 2006, 05:36:34 AM
Pokemon is the one franchise that could've single-handedly sold more N64s and GCNs, but Nintendo just did not capitalize on its success.  The window of opportunity is barely open to do this and yet Nintendo has not capitalized with the MMORPG that everyone's been asking for.  Pokemon can put Nintendo WiFi on the map in a hurry if done right.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 07, 2006, 05:37:43 AM
I full expect this game to have WiFi features.  It won't be an MMO, but you can still trade, battle, and hopefully enter tournaments online I'm sure.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 06:58:17 AM
God, why do people still talk about a Pokemon MMORPG when there are so many huge daunting challenges that need to be overcome if the game goes in that direction! Blockbuster Traditional MMORPGs take YEARS of development and are the DEVIL to do right!

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com  
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: EasyCure on June 07, 2006, 07:03:58 AM
i lost all interest in pokemon back in the days of 64, but if they made an mmorpg where i could use the wiimote to simulate throwing a pokeball into battle, i'd give it a shot ;-)
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 07, 2006, 07:12:33 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Kairon
God, why do people still talk about a Pokemon MMORPG when there are so many huge daunting challenges that need to be overcome if the game goes in that direction! Blockbuster Traditional MMORPGs take YEARS of development and are the DEVIL to do right!

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com

Sounds like reason enough that we haven't seen one yet but doesn't prove that one isn't in development

I do agree on some level though.  Older PokeGeeks (like me) would want more than Nintendo could deliver anyway.  They need kids to play Pokemon, and parents won't be keen on throwing their kids out there to the predators...  sexual predators =P  So lets not turn this thread into a NiNTENd0 SHULD MAKES TEH MMO POKYMAN thread and instead discuss what can be done to improve the stadium games!
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Requiem on June 07, 2006, 07:26:56 AM
Meh....never been a fan of pokemon, so whatever....
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Nephilim on June 07, 2006, 07:29:33 AM
you never had a good reason to flame this thread, so whatever
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Wackman on June 07, 2006, 07:30:06 AM
wow, those graphics look great!. Ihope they are gameplay graphics! Don't care much for Pokemon though.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Requiem on June 07, 2006, 07:32:29 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: DeadlyD
you never had a good reason to flame this thread, so whatever


ummm....




What?
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 07:32:30 AM
This game is set to release a couple months after Diamond/Pearl... when is Diamond Pearl releasing? This year? THIS YEAR?!?! WHEN?!?!?!

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 07:37:45 AM
Hmmm... IGN claims a Dec. 2006 release date for Pokemon Diamond/Pearl in Japan. 3 months after that is March 2007, which is sort of 9 months from now, enough time to pump out a Pokemon Stadium type title assuming they only started developing right now.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Bloodworth on June 07, 2006, 07:43:54 AM
The graphics are real-time.
http://www.irwebcasting.com/060607/03/74d18b0400/main/index_hi.htm
Go to slide 70 and then press the third button under the slide to see Pokemon in action.  
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 07, 2006, 07:44:27 AM
But we won't see them for like 2 years in the states
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: ShyGuy on June 07, 2006, 08:10:25 AM
Dang, that video looked impressive. More like N64 graphics, amIrite??
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ian Sane on June 07, 2006, 08:32:14 AM
"The window of opportunity is barely open to do this and yet Nintendo has not capitalized with the MMORPG that everyone's been asking for."

The MMO stuff is a relatively recent idea.  The original game everyone wanted back on the N64 was a 3D Pokemon RPG that played like the Gameboy games with going to gyms, capturing Pokemon, etc.  The time to have released this was early in the Cube's life, around 2002 or so.  At that point the craze was still reasonably strong and it would have sold Cubes like hotcakes.  The Xbox would NEVER have pulled ahead that Christmas if they had this game on the Cube.  Instead Pokemon Colloseum came out way too late and although technically an RPG it was completely devoid of all the elements that make Pokemon fun and is one of the most frustratingly bad games I've ever played.  Nintendo blew it.  They had the perfect killer app and now it's too late for it to quite have the same punch it would have had a few years ago.

Not that they shouldn't ever release such a game.  It would still sell really well and every killer game helps.  The way Nintendo has handled Pokemon has been very non-Nintendo like.  Normally they seem to recognize the importance of making really phenomenal sequels and not relying entirely on a franchise name to attract sales.  But with Pokemon they've released all sorts of substandard junk and although Gold/Silver was awesome they phoned it in with the GBA Pokemon games.  They've handled Pokemon more like how I would expect EA to handle a franchise.

Pokemon Battle Revolution looks nice anyway and I'm glad they're not doing any BS where the seperate Stadium into two games and try to sell junk like Pokemon Box as a seperate game.  I've never liked how Nintendo has handled Pokemon but they did a WAY better job with it during the N64 days than the Cube days so if they're going back to the N64 way of doing things that's an improvement.  Plus it's kind of cool that this game is coming out so soon.  They've got a lot of stuff in the works for the Wii.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Requiem on June 07, 2006, 08:38:33 AM
I don't know Ian. An awesome pokemon remincent of the GBA with a WiFi Stadium multiplayer would be a killer-app for sure (at least in Japan).

People would train there pokemons for months just so they could compete in the latest and greatest tournament. Add in fantastic prizes if you win, and you not only have a cult following, but also a killer-app on your hands.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Frozen Atlantic on June 07, 2006, 09:55:23 AM
Nintendo had the kids version of Grand Theft Auto in 2000 and totally blew it.

Now they have the kids version of...um... The Getaway. Not blockbuster, but a solid franchise. They're still blowing it.

MAKE A NORMAL, 30-HOUR POKERPG FOR WII. With a storyline. Sell 2 million of them. Not that difficult.  
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 09:58:47 AM
But that is the path to the dark side Frozen Atlantic!

Pokemon from a game design standpoint is stagnant and tired. Nintendo needs to friggin innovate a little with the core series.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ian Sane on June 07, 2006, 10:07:58 AM
"I don't know Ian. An awesome pokemon remincent of the GBA with a WiFi Stadium multiplayer would be a killer-app for sure (at least in Japan)."

In Japan yeah.  And by regular videogame standards such a game would still be a killer app.  But Pokemon used to be a mainstream killer app in North America.  It was one of those games that EVERYONE was somewhat familiar with even if they didn't play it.

"Pokemon from a game design standpoint is stagnant and tired. Nintendo needs to friggin innovate a little with the core series."

Well they've never done it right in 3D.  I figure such a game would be as innovative as Zelda's transition to 3D.  It'll be like the N64 days when Nintendo was making old franchises feel new again just by switching them to 3D.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Magik on June 07, 2006, 10:18:50 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Requiem
I don't know Ian. An awesome pokemon remincent of the GBA with a WiFi Stadium multiplayer would be a killer-app for sure (at least in Japan).

People would train there pokemons for months just so they could compete in the latest and greatest tournament. Add in fantastic prizes if you win, and you not only have a cult following, but also a killer-app on your hands.



An online enabled Pokemon game is pretty much what every pokemon fan has been wanting since the beginning.  It would give the Pokemon franchise new life.

Like you said, it would give people reason to actually train their pokemons so they can compete online.  
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 11:04:48 AM
It's on Youtube.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Requiem on June 07, 2006, 11:11:15 AM
Wow...

That actually looks....wonderful! The graphics, though shiny, are nice and rounded.

I'm telling you, WiFi this son of a bitch and attach a GREAT adventure mood and watch the money roll in!
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 07, 2006, 11:22:37 AM
Oh...my...I'm not a Stadium fan at ALL, but that looked FANTASTIC!
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: mantidor on June 07, 2006, 11:31:55 AM
Bah I hate pokemon but that looked great... well, Ill admit I liked the minigames in pokemon stadium.



Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 11:35:59 AM
What they should do is make the entire adventure take place or revolve around the "stadium" location and all that embodies.

Stadiums are big places that seat thousands. I'm sure there's a lot that happens in them, I'm sure there's lots of ways to get lost in one, lots of concession stands to visit, and lots of hidden hallways and stuff like that.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Frozen Atlantic on June 07, 2006, 11:40:09 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Kairon

Pokemon from a game design standpoint is stagnant and tired. Nintendo needs to friggin innovate a little with the core series.


Will the extra dev time and money result in many more sales? I submit it won't. How many high school kids are going to be brught in by a dramatic reinvention of Pokemon? Zero. From a business perspective, Nintendo just needs to make a game that's "not crap". Seeing their world and favorite characters in 3D, allowing them to play against the world, and a new feature or two will do it. Think Madden.

Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Requiem on June 07, 2006, 11:46:05 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Kairon
What they should do is make the entire adventure take place or revolve around the "stadium" location and all that embodies.

Stadiums are big places that seat thousands. I'm sure there's a lot that happens in them, I'm sure there's lots of ways to get lost in one, lots of concession stands to visit, and lots of hidden hallways and stuff like that.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com



While that would be cool, I think Nintendo should stick to it's tried and true formula. Going across huge distances and different locales to fight Pokemon Dojo masters has always been appealing and it will continue to be appealing.

Like Ian said, simply transfering the franchise to 3D will make it seem fresh and new. That's all the innovation they need really. Add in some very beautiful graphics (for things like the location, i.e. forest, ocean, etc.) and maybe a Wiimote pokeball toss and you have yourself a hit.

Hell, I'd be tempted to check it out, if the exploration factor is anything like Zelda's.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 07, 2006, 11:47:31 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Frozen Atlantic
Quote

Originally posted by: Kairon

Pokemon from a game design standpoint is stagnant and tired. Nintendo needs to friggin innovate a little with the core series.


Will the extra dev time and money result in many more sales? I submit it won't. How many high school kids are going to be brught in by a dramatic reinvention of Pokemon? Zero. From a business perspective, Nintendo just needs to make a game that's "not crap". Seeing their world and favorite characters in 3D, allowing them to play against the world, and a new feature or two will do it. Think Madden.


THE ANTI-CHRIST!

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com

Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Frozen Atlantic on June 07, 2006, 12:50:42 PM
I'm sorry, Mr. Madden can't hear you right now, he's currently bathing in money. Would you like to leave a message?
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ceric on June 07, 2006, 12:55:00 PM
<gilded rant>I want whatever you guys are smoking.  That did not look fantastic.  Not even remotely. </gilded rant>The bacground and everything looked wonderful.  I'll give you that.  But the Pokemon and Trainers looked like Plastic toys.  Ever since the first Stadium  I've wanted proper looking pokemon.  I wanted a 3D version of what they were suppose to look like.  That means Pikachu would have fur.  The whale one would look like it had whale skin.  Rock pokemon would look like ... rock.  Not this plastic junk. There is no excuse with the increased storage of the Wii and the increased graphics it ought to happen.  Star Fox Adventure had fur.  They sacrificed everything background wise but for a stadium style game that be ok.  That's something I have against the newest version of Smash pikachu.  Everyone got an upgrade, except Kirby but what are you going to do? Give him his on special lighting?, Pikachu changed color slightly.  Fur people.  Fur. Why...  
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Wackman on June 07, 2006, 01:09:44 PM
they are toy-like creatures. it's not that hard to give Pikachu fur. Just look at donkey Kong Jungle Beat and Starfox adventures.
They chose this toy-look, and frankly i think it looks great. and i don't even like pokemon...
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ian Sane on June 07, 2006, 01:24:16 PM
Anyone complaining about how the Pokemon look should consider the fact that there are over 300 Pokemon (and with Pearl/Diamond it will be over 400) and each of them would need their own 3D model.  They have to make the characters look simplistic if they're to fit them all in.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Knoxxville on June 07, 2006, 02:03:40 PM
I hope it's compatible with Pokemon Box!
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: IceCold on June 07, 2006, 02:10:04 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: ShyGuy
Dang, that video looked impressive. More like N64 graphics, amIrite??
Video?

EDIT: Sorry.. just saw it. Is there any high resolution version?
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on June 07, 2006, 03:06:13 PM
Wow it looks great, with polished animationy lighting.

*raises arms in the air*

Not buying it!
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Arbok on June 07, 2006, 06:37:54 PM
They actually hit each other... and it's sad that I'm excited about that as they never bothered to do it before, and should have for the GCN version.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Crimm on June 07, 2006, 07:42:45 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Arbok
They actually hit each other... and it's sad that I'm excited about that as they never bothered to do it before, and should have for the GCN version.


That actually excited me too, and annoyed me since the second Stadium game.  I figured since it was the same engine they weren't really doing that much between 1 and 2 on the N64; it should have been added then.  

I hope Pokemon Channel Revolution is announced too!  I can change the channel by twisting the wii-mote or aim it like a TV remote!
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Mario on June 07, 2006, 08:44:54 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Knoxxville
I hope it's compatible with Pokemon Box!

It should be. Pokemon DS is supposed to be compatable with the GBA ones, so you can transfer your Pokemon from Pokemon Box to Pokemon Sapphire to Pokemon DS to Pokemon Wii.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: nickmitch on June 07, 2006, 09:42:00 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
Anyone complaining about how the Pokemon look should consider the fact that there are over 300 Pokemon (and with Pearl/Diamond it will be over 400) and each of them would need their own 3D model.  They have to make the characters look simplistic if they're to fit them all in.


Yeah, there are 386 pokémon (unless Bosly makes 387) not having a hairy Pikachu (see other thread) is a-ok. Making the pokémon that realistic would make the game lose its feel anyway. The plastic look is perfectly suitable for the pokémon style.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Crimm on June 07, 2006, 09:56:55 PM
They could reduce the sheen a little bit and it would improve it some.
I mean, they shouldn't look like they are coated in shellac.

In their defence, it isn't to the frosted donut level of Tekken 6: the Krispy Kreme Tournament.  If their skin shined anymore it would be blinding.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Caterkiller on June 07, 2006, 10:19:17 PM
As a huge Pokemon fan who was dissapointed with the last 2 console games, I think this looks wonderfull. The big attacks seem to do damage to the back grounds, the pokemon actualy touch each other now(thank god!) and the pokemon and trainer animations look very nice as well.  And with this game having well over 386 different 3D pokemon models, I think the graphics for it are awesome.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Infernal Monkey on June 07, 2006, 11:29:23 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Crimm

I hope Pokemon Channel Revolution is announced too!  I can change the channel by twisting the wii-mote or aim it like a TV remote!


Yes! <3
I've never been a big fan of these Stadium type Pokemon games.. or the RPG ones. =x But this looks pretty cool. The stage was like Orchid's or something from Killer Instinct. Just needs really bad music and the illusion will be complete.

Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 08, 2006, 03:38:51 AM
Has anyone stopped and think that Nintendo wants pokemon to look like that?  Why would they use a sam fisher realistic model in a game that has always been cartoony?
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Infernal Monkey on June 08, 2006, 05:36:21 AM
Cel shading would be awesome in a Pokemon game.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Darkheart on June 08, 2006, 05:43:20 AM
What if we could put our face on the trainer @________@,  

::Loud Horns and Trumpet Fanfares::

::  Anouncer :: CONGRATULATIONS YOUVE MADE IT TO THE END OF THE GAME

::Roll Credits::
. . . . .
::Credits shred to pieces as the BIG red words appear on the screen::

NEW CHALLENGER

:: Announcer :: Incoming to the ring is Trainer Myamoto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

::shigs:: GO ULTIMATE POKEMON

:: Throws pokeball on the ground as the ground starts to shake and the ceiling starts to fall down upon the stadium.  After the smoke and dust finally clear away a new ultimate pokemon appears admist it all ::

REGGIEMON!


I don't know I thought that would be a cool idea!

 
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Caterkiller on June 08, 2006, 05:59:16 AM
One other thing I noticed that may please everyone. You can definitly hear Pikachu say its name befor it attacks. Now then, this was also true with the frist 2 Stadium games but it was just Pikachu. I am trying to listen out for the other 3 Pokemon, but there seems to be too much noise over the clip. If anyone thinks they can make out these Japanese names they  are Deokisishu(thing with tenticles), Hoeruo(whale), and Groudon(big red one). I hear vague roars, but no yelling of their own names yet. Hopefully Pikachu is an indication that the 10 year old Game Boy noises are done away with for this game.  
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Bill Aurion on June 08, 2006, 06:36:33 AM
I thought some Pokemon don't even say their names, but rather make roars and the like?
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 08, 2006, 07:44:13 AM
the pokemon saying their names thing came out of the cartoon.  I think the roars are much much better.  The problem with the colosseum games was that they sounded just like the game boy ones.  They need to update those, but please don't bring back the them saying their names thing.

In the original stadium games pikachu only said pikachu if it happened to be one transferred from pokemon yellow.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Caterkiller on June 08, 2006, 08:34:10 AM
It started with the cartoon yes, but don't forget Pokemon snap, or Pokemon Channel. Its awesome listening to the Pokemon, I could never imagine squirtle or mew just making some lame bark or growl. Had the pokemon in Snap just been making more generic growls the experience would have been cut short by alot. Most Pokemon say their names when they speak, they all have a different call, which is why no two Pokemon in the hand held versions have the same noises. Im sure Nintendo or Sotashi Tajuri wanted the Pokemon to say their names from the get go. Some Pokemon like Gyrados sound like Godzilla but technicaly its supposed to be it saying Gyrados, same goes for Onix, Dragonite and bunch more. It's been established since day one in the states that the Pokemon say their names when they speak, I would hate for Pikachu once again to be the only one who gets to do whats right.  
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: JonLeung on June 08, 2006, 08:50:46 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: TVman

Yeah, there are 386 pokémon (unless Bosly makes 387) not having a hairy Pikachu (see other thread) is a-ok. Making the pokémon that realistic would make the game lose its feel anyway. The plastic look is perfectly suitable for the pokémon style.


And what about Munchlax?  Hmmm?

I don't think the Pokémon need to be realistic, but longtime Pokémon fans are nearly ten years older than when the first games came out, so if they were 6 when they caught them all, they'll be a bit insecure about it if they are nearly 16 now and somehow still playing.  It wouldn't hurt.

Or at the very least, a little bit of hair on Pikachu can't hurt.  Not a major biggie wither way.

Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Mikintosh on June 08, 2006, 11:09:07 PM
Well, I always figured on the updating, rather than revolutionizing nature of the Pokemon franchise was due to the fact that an outside studio, Game Freak, did the development; I counted it as Nintendo inasmuch as it was part of Super Smash Bros., but I felt it could be handled differently than Mario and Zelda. Besides, the basic structure of Red/Blue is so brilliant, I don't mind playing through it *counts* nine times on the handhelds alone.

The console games are a different story. The two Stadium games where the best, and especially 2's wide range of cups and all that mini-game stuff made you really feel like you were getting a lot of bang for your buck. Plus, playing the gym leader's castle was the closest thing to a genuine Pokemon console RPG. Until Colloseum, which, as opposed to every other Pokemon game I own, I haven't finished. The leveling up is awkward and difficult, the story doesn't have the innocence of the Game Freak games, and they forgot to put the cups in, taking out a lot of what made the Stadium games worth playing. I haven't bought Pokemon XD yet, but I suspect more of the same.

So, if Pokemon BR can bring back the charm of the Stadium games (that they used Red & Green from the Kanto games is a good sign), I'd be very pleased. I'm sure I'll end up buying it anyway, but I'd rather do it with enthusiasm.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: wandering on June 08, 2006, 11:12:42 PM
Quote

The console games are a different story. The two Stadium games where the best, and especially 2's wide range of cups and all that mini-game stuff made you really feel like you were getting a lot of bang for your buck. Plus, playing the gym leader's castle was the closest thing to a genuine Pokemon console RPG. Until Colloseum, which, as opposed to every other Pokemon game I own, I haven't finished. The leveling up is awkward and difficult, the story doesn't have the innocence of the Game Freak games, and they forgot to put the cups in, taking out a lot of what made the Stadium games worth playing. I haven't bought Pokemon XD yet, but I suspect more of the same.

What, no love for Snap?

Anyway, I know I'm a bit late to the party, but I've seen the trailer. I don't really care that much about graphics, but I'm a pushover when it comes to slickness. And, dang, this thing is looking slick.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Pale on June 09, 2006, 03:49:12 AM
Point taken on snap and channel.

I agree that pokemon like Mew, and even Jigglypuff make sense saying their names... but others just sound stupid, especially the ones with the more American sounding names.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ceric on June 09, 2006, 04:51:16 AM
Most of the Fighting types names aren't bad.  You can really show emotion with the Syllabuls(sp?)
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Caterkiller on June 09, 2006, 07:55:19 AM
Well I noticed the bigger, scarier, legendary Pokemon have big growls rather than you really hearing their names. And if your like me, you will be seeing oponents with mostly those pokemon any way, cause most of the people I know who play Pokemon are wimps and can't seem to make a team with out them. I never  ever use legendaries.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Mikintosh on June 09, 2006, 09:01:51 AM
Totally forgot Snap; I still love that baby. Ditto for Puzzle League, as it brought in the anime (which I was a particular fan of at the time) into a quality puzzle game that still holds up. Never found the Game Boy TCG games, tho; what a weird concept.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Kairon on June 09, 2006, 09:04:37 AM
I am SOOO buying Snap for virtual console.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: Ceric on December 17, 2006, 03:25:30 PM
I just saw the videos up on IGN.  I can't really complain  too much... I still don't like how they all look like plastic but everything else is done really well and in the videos there was a Far Fetch'd.  So I can't say anything really bad since if memory serve that particular pokemon wasn't in the original new games set so I'm really excited to see real onion sprig action.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: NeoThunder on March 07, 2007, 05:54:07 PM
OK....So if you can use your DS as a controller, AND you can play over Wi-Fi......doesn't that mean you can do both at the same time.  It seems this was a debate that the Wii couldn't do both at the same time.
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: MaryJane on March 08, 2007, 02:44:07 AM
I think it would stand to reason, because Nintendo look extremely foolish, why have a controller option that doesn't work at all times of gameplay?

I'm looking forward to this game for its online purposes but I am extremely disappointed in the lack of an actual game. It's basically a way to play a DS game online (which you can do through the DS anyway), on a big screen.
Title: RE: Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: NeoThunder on March 08, 2007, 06:15:40 AM
ya but this way you have cool looking 3D rendered pokemon doing actual battle
Title: RE:Pokemon Battle Revolution!
Post by: MaryJane on March 08, 2007, 07:07:49 AM
I completely agree, I am going to pre-order this game once I actually get a Wii, my brother already pre-ordered his, and there's no real point in me pre-oredering my own if I don't have my own Wii. Hopefully the drought doesn't continue through June, in a way I hope it does because more sales of consoles means more games, but I want one dammit.