Name | Price | Date | Post |
Ceric | $299.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667323#msg667323 | |
Adrock | $349.99 | 6/10/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667325#msg667325 |
NeoStar9X | $299.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667326#msg667326 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667484#msg667484 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667484#msg667484) | |
Caterkiller | $299.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667341#msg667341 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg670010#msg670010 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg670010#msg670010) | |
rad.i.kal | $249.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667344#msg667344 | |
Rachtman | $349.991,4 $299.99 | 9/23/2012 3/25/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679322#msg679322 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667374#msg667374 |
coffeewithgames | $199.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667440#msg667440 | |
Chozo Ghost | $329.99 | 6/17/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667446#msg667446 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669072#msg669072 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669072#msg669072) |
Shaymin | $249.991 | 11/18/2012 6/17/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679194#msg679194 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667448#msg667448 |
NWR_insanolord | $14.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667451#msg667451 | |
Luigi Dude | $299.99 | 11/18/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667473#msg667473 |
Mop it up | $299.99 | 11/18/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667518#msg667518 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667518#msg667518) http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667530#msg667530 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667530#msg667530) http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679362#msg679362 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679362#msg679362) |
Tanookisuit | $299.99 | 9/30/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667542#msg667542 |
nemo | $329.12 | 3/29/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667545#msg667545 |
UncleBoba | €2.675,973,5 | 29/03/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg668923#msg668923 |
BlackNMild2k1 | N/A | 6/19/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg668972#msg668972 |
Louieturkey | $329.99 | 10/28/2012 6/14/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg724102#msg724102 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg668990#msg668990 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg668990#msg668990) |
MaryJane | $200 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669100#msg669100 | |
ShyGuy | $299.99 | 6/17/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669090#msg669090 |
GoldenPheonix | $299.99 $349.99 | 4/30/2012** 10/28/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679520#msg679520 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669161#msg669161 |
Drago175 | $349.99 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669643#msg669643 | |
Lithium | $349.99 | 11/19/2012 11/19/2011 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669648#msg669648 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679365#msg679365 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679365#msg679365) |
Rhoq | $349.99 | 4/1/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg669986#msg669986 |
kraken613 | $299.99 | 11/20/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679310#msg679310 |
ThePerm | $299.99 | 11/22/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679320#msg679320 |
FZeroBoyo | $3501 | 11/18/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679419#msg679419 |
Bman87301 | $249.99 | 8/12/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679574#msg679574 |
Quadran | €299.993 | 6/12/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679598#msg679598 |
Rachtman | $279.991,4 | 11/16/2012 | http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg724127#msg724127 (http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg724127#msg724127) |
With the Wii 1 down to 150 soon It may be 249.99! I say This year, Dec 2011! Why not a christmas release, we have no good wii games to hold us over for two years? Nah no way.That is a good point but DQX could make a whole quarter for them in their core market of Japan. Never felt Nintendo gave a flying flip about US this latter half because they have a real competitor in the 360 here and people are still steadily buying the Wii for Wii Sports. Hence why it seems the normal anemic Europe support is getting better from the outside looking in even though it is more work to properly move a game, more languages etc.
It needs to come out THIS year, but all the rumors seem to be hinting at a late 2012 release. It may be possible that Nintendo themselves leaked out a false rumor in order to throw off the competition. If the rumors are correct then it will come out late 2012, but I'm going to be hoping the rumors are wrong and we will see it this year.
.......
As unlikely as a $299.99 price is, anything less than that is just absurd. If its priced $249.99 or $199.99 then it will be priced less than the 360/PS3 which would be ridiculous for a technologically superior system.
Agree the 3DS was not a properly supported launch but neither was the DS.
I agree Chozo I think that it should be this year.
If they are only just now approaching 3rd parties with dev kits then there's no way they can launch it this year. If developers are only getting the dev kits now then there's no way anything more than tech demos could be complete by the end of the year. They can't launch a new console with zero launch titles.... well, they could but...That is a problem. We have rumors just to go on right now. They might only be getting kits out to developers now or some might already have them. Then there is the case of them maybe giving equivalent kits but not the official ones. Something that might allow them to port current games they might have or already have in development and get started on new games until the official ones are ready if they aren't already. Now if the system upscaled games that might be something that could take up a small amount of time until new system games arrive. Give a new lease on life to a number of older titles if only for a short amount of time.
If they are only just now approaching 3rd parties with dev kits then there's no way they can launch it this year. If developers are only getting the dev kits now then there's no way anything more than tech demos could be complete by the end of the year. They can't launch a new console with zero launch titles.... well, they could but...
The 18th then. Nintendo launches hardware the Sunday before Thanksgiving. GameCube, DS, Wii and I'll bet they tried like hell to have the 3DS out in time for that slot, but it fell to DKCR.See what the Launch lineup is like that was just another nail in the coffin on hitting that.
$329.12 on 3/29/12.Would it be $3,903.12 on 29/03/12 in Europe?
See what I did there?
I figure E3 2012 will be June 5-7 2012
Cafe will release exactly 2 weeks later on Tues. June 19th 2012 (or that same week Sun 17th - Sun 24th)
I think that is the same week schools should be getting out for Summer, so it would benefit from not only E3 HYPE but Summer Vacation Excitement.
I want to see what level of capability we are talking here before I guess on a price.I Respect your decision and I'll keep you at N/A until I get the definitive BnM Price post.
If it does everything I hope it does with 4 independent screens @ 800x480(?) & the TV @ 1080p, graphics far enough beyond PS360 that it's not to be far outclassed by PS4/X720 then I want to say $349.99
If it's just a marginal bump beyond the PS360 and the streaming controllers are not as full featured in their use as I imagine (see the rumor thread), then $299.99
Both ways with a game packed in that makes use of the new controller.
But I'm not gonna make a solid prediction on price until I see/know what we are pricing.
Does anyone who picked a 2011 date want to revise it?
Alliteration will never again work as well as it did for Sega with the Dreamcast.If they launched on 11/11/11, that wouldn't be as good?
Alliteration will never again work as well as it did for Sega with the Dreamcast.If they launched on 11/11/11, that wouldn't be as good?
Alliteration will never again work as well as it did for Sega with the Dreamcast.If they launched on 11/11/11, that wouldn't be as good?
I'm not sure if launching against Skyrim and Minecraft would be brilliant or stupid.
Does anyone who picked a 2011 date want to revise it?
In its announcement earlier today, Nintendo stated that it had not included sales of the Wii successor in its earnings forecasts for the current fiscal year, which ends on March 31, 2012. You might have guessed that this means a release for the system after that date. This is the case, Iwata confirmed during the press conference. The Wii 2 will not arrive until after April 2012.
http://www.andriasang.com/e/blog/2011/04/25/iwata_on_wii_2/ (http://www.andriasang.com/e/blog/2011/04/25/iwata_on_wii_2/)I want the actual quote from Iwata before I put full stock in them. Nintendo is not big about giving anything on date till you have it.Quote from: April 24, 2011In its announcement earlier today, Nintendo stated that it had not included sales of the Wii successor in its earnings forecasts for the current fiscal year, which ends on March 31, 2012. You might have guessed that this means a release for the system after that date. This is the case, Iwata confirmed during the press conference. The Wii 2 will not arrive until after April 2012.
I don't know if that is interpretation or a paraphrasing of a direct quote, but I just thought I would throw that out there.
Does anyone who picked a 2011 date want to revise it?
I would like to, but its cheating! I would now say March 20, 2012
What makes you think the controller itself will cost $150? From what I can tell the 3DS is around $100 to manufacture and it has more components in it than the screen controller.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20110608182737_Wii_U_Will_Cost_More_Than_249_President_of_Nintendo.html (http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/display/20110608182737_Wii_U_Will_Cost_More_Than_249_President_of_Nintendo.html)I surprised it took you so long to find this news considering I posted it this morning...
QuoteIwata signaled the WiiU will likely be priced at more than 20,000 yen ($250) in Japan when it goes on sale next year, the Nikkei newspaper reported today, citing an interview with the president. Nintendo is unlikely to sell the new console for the same price as the current Wii, the report cited Iwata as saying.
Also sounds like a $299 price point is what they are aiming for.
The console can't be $299.99. The controller alone is going to cost half that much. If its $299.99 that means we would end up with a $150 console. Judging by the specs, I don't think that's going to be the case, and Nintendo isn't going to sell anything for a loss, so...
What if there were two SKUs fpr this thing that included the Umote for $349.99 and the second one featured an upgraded Wiimote without the Umote for $299.99. I would be game for this if it were to happen.Not Happening. Every Sku will have the uMote. Though I don't see Nintendo doing Multi-Sku except for maybe a different color and pack-in game. Like the Hardcore one and the Casual one, MW3 or Wii Sports for a current gen example.
Considering Nintendo is positioning Skyward Sword as the Wii's last hurrah and has nothing to release afterwards, I'm sticking with my original guess. I really don't think they can afford to launch past June. In fact, they should probably launch earlier but they only need to launch before July 1 to be within Q2.Can they afford to launch before June though? We didn't even see any actual Wii U games at E3 so I have my doubts that they could have any games ready for the first half of next year. The only one we know exists is Pikmin 3 and that alone doesn't seem like it could carry a console launch. Nintendo doesn't seem to have much issue going months without releases since they're not releasing a Wii game of any real substance until 9 months into this year (Kirby in September). Next year, they'll probably release Dragon Quest X in March and consider that enough for 8 months.
Can they afford to launch before June though? We didn't even see any actual Wii U games at E3 so I have my doubts that they could have any games ready for the first half of next year. The only one we know exists is Pikmin 3 and that alone doesn't seem like it could carry a console launch. Nintendo doesn't seem to have much issue going months without releases since they're not releasing a Wii game of any real substance until 9 months into this year (Kirby in September). Next year, they'll probably release Dragon Quest X in March and consider that enough for 8 months.Nintendo made a conscious choice not to show any real WiiU games even from 3rd parties (Vigil Games apparently had Darksiders II running on WiiU hardware but Nintendo insisted on showing PS3 footage), but they're all in the works. All 3rd party games will be ports from PS3/360 and Nintendo should work with 3rd parties to have those games launch simultaneously on WiiU. It would also be wise to negotiate some big name 3rd party games that came out Q4 2011 such as Final Fantasy XIII-2 to be available at launch. There are plenty of devout Nintendo fans who only own a Wii who are itching to play those games.
Then why bother showing it at all if they can't show anything of substance? That's what I don't understand, it felt like Nintendo weren't actually ready to show the system yet since all they had were demos that don't look like they will end up as actual games. But I guess they didn't have much choice, it was going to get leaked eventually by developers (and pretty much did before E3) so I guess Nintendo wanted to make sure they were the ones to officially unveil it. And I s'pose it's also so people know a new system is coming. It doesn't make sense to me, but such is life.Thinking back to some previous hardware announcements/unveilings, how many of them showed actual games? Gamecube had that demo reel at Spaceworld 2000. None of those were real games, at least not when showed. I don't remember if any of them were playable though I don't believe they were. The only thing I remember of the PS2 unveiling was Sony showing off the CG dance scene from Final Fantasy VIII and claiming that their GPU could produce games that looks anything like that (not even close). PS3 showed CG of Killzone 2 (the final product looked good, but not that good) and a remade intro of Final Fantasy VII.
Oh right, this thread is about the release date. Even though I'm sticking with my prediction of November, I hope you're right about June. That way I'd be able to see the games sooner and find out if the system is of any value. June might actually be a good time if they can manage it; they could show off all the games at E3, then say "And it's all in stores next week!"
i say 80 tops because
the handheld is not a console its a controller with a screen in it, the most expensive component will be the screen, all other components were mass produced to such an extant for other systems that they probably cost no more than a dollar each, so the screen is probably 50 or so dollars for now, but then again Nintendo could get a great deal from their supplier considering they buy 100s of millions of screens. If sold seperately i expect it to sell for 80 dollars with a profit.
i say 80 tops because
the handheld is not a console its a controller with a screen in it, the most expensive component will be the screen, all other components were mass produced to such an extant for other systems that they probably cost no more than a dollar each, so the screen is probably 50 or so dollars for now, but then again Nintendo could get a great deal from their supplier considering they buy 100s of millions of screens. If sold seperately i expect it to sell for 80 dollars with a profit.
Perhaps a more interesting question would be: How much would you be willing to pay for a Wii U?
But since none of that is the case, I probably wouldn't pay more than $199.
Come on, no one complained about the 4GB 360!
You wouldn't pay more than $200 just because it has a horrible name?
the whole issue with the single uMote may be fixed at a later time; we have over a year before the console release.
And seriously? You wouldn't pay more than $200 just because it has a horrible name?
And seriously? You wouldn't pay more than $200 just because it has a horrible name?
And seriously? You wouldn't pay more than $200 just because it has a horrible name?
Any chance we can change our date? Since we now know that the NextBox won't be out this year, I think Nintendo will wait until closer to the holidays. My new guess is 10/28/12, a couple days before Assassin's Creed 3 is released.Done but, your old guess is right under so if there is a tie the person who did it in less guesses wins.
November 16, 2012 with pack in game, Wii Remote Plus and nunchuk. $279.99 MSRPDone
Well, I think I'll keep my price guess, but clearly my release date needs some adjustment. November is probably the way to go.Need a date.
No chance it comes out before November IMO.
Well, I think I'll keep my price guess, but clearly my release date needs some adjustment. November is probably the way to go.Need a date.
Your original date passed so you be behind the people who changed there before it passed.
This is just conjecture on my part but I think it has something to do with how Nintendo divvies up quarterly profits. For example, N64, like you said, launched in September. I believe it launched on 30th to be exact which is the last day of Q3. That means every single sale on that day counts as Q3 profit. Nintendo delayed N64 a couple times so my guess is that Nintendo pushed the launch back as far as possible without crossing another quarter which ultimately would have screwed up their numbers more than they already were at that point.No chance it comes out before November IMO.
Why do you say that? The N64 launched in September and the SNES launched in July or August, so a Nintendo console launching earlier than November is not unprecedented. They aren't going to be facing any competition this year, so they don't need to worry about anyone else stealing the holiday spotlight from them. They could release the console tomorrow, and they would still dominate the holidays. Therefore there is no reason for them to hold back, as long as they have the hardware and software ready. And we know the hardware is finalized, so the only potential issue is the software.
Why would they want to delay until the holidays?Companies are expected to have and subsequently project strong Q4 performance. If I had to guess, that would be why. Unlike 1996 with N64, Nintendo didn't delay wii U. They just never announced anything concrete allowing them the luxury of launching without a strict deadline. Launching in the busiest time of year when consumers are more willing to spend money does make sense, especially to investors.
I'd assume that a holiday launch would ensure that a console doesn't have a reputation (other than brand new thing) going into the shopping season. A console launched in September would be just as if not more available than a console launching in November, it's just that by December, the console could already be a hit ...or not.Why would they want to delay until the holidays?Companies are expected to have and subsequently project strong Q4 performance. If I had to guess, that would be why. Unlike 1996 with N64, Nintendo didn't delay wii U. They just never announced anything concrete allowing them the luxury of launching without a strict deadline. Launching in the busiest time of year when consumers are more willing to spend money does make sense, especially to investors.
Why would they want to delay until the holidays?Companies are expected to have and subsequently project strong Q4 performance. If I had to guess, that would be why. Unlike 1996 with N64, Nintendo didn't delay wii U. They just never announced anything concrete allowing them the luxury of launching without a strict deadline. Launching in the busiest time of year when consumers are more willing to spend money does make sense, especially to investors.
Why would they want to delay until the holidays?Companies are expected to have and subsequently project strong Q4 performance. If I had to guess, that would be why. Unlike 1996 with N64, Nintendo didn't delay wii U. They just never announced anything concrete allowing them the luxury of launching without a strict deadline. Launching in the busiest time of year when consumers are more willing to spend money does make sense, especially to investors.
I think you're missing my point. They have the holiday season ENTIRELY to themselves, so the holiday sales are going to be great regardless of when they release it. And let's face it, the thing is probably going to be sold out continuously for months if not a year or two just like the first Wii was.How so? Nintendo doesn't have the holiday season to themselves. PS3 and 360 still exist. Sony and Microsoft will have no shortages and all of the 3rd party games, not just the ones 3rd parties felt like porting over. Tomb Raider, for example, is already confirmed to not be coming to Wii U.
Nintendo doesn't lose any holiday sales by releasing it earlier. They still get as much holiday sales, plus extra. But if they release in the holidays then they just get the holiday sales and nothing else. Do you see what I'm saying?I don't understand what you mean by "plus extra." Nintendo is going to have a finite amount of units available which bound to sell out by the end of the year. Launching earlier just dilutes those sales over the course of a few extra months. For example, let's say Nintendo has X million units available. They can only sell X million units. They either sell X million units from say September to December or X million units from November to December. If Wii U sells out either way, why wouldn't Nintendo just launch during the holidays when the attach rate on games and accessories are higher because, as previously stated, it's the season when people are far more willing to spend more money? Nintendo increases profits and investors are happy. Personally, I'd love to get it sooner because you know, "Shut up and take my money" but from a business perspective, it make sense to launch in November.
I think you're missing my point. They have the holiday season ENTIRELY to themselves, so the holiday sales are going to be great regardless of when they release it. And let's face it, the thing is probably going to be sold out continuously for months if not a year or two just like the first Wii was.How so? Nintendo doesn't have the holiday season to themselves. PS3 and 360 still exist. Sony and Microsoft will have no shortages and all of the 3rd party games, not just the ones 3rd parties felt like porting over. Tomb Raider, for example, is already confirmed to not be coming to Wii U.QuoteNintendo doesn't lose any holiday sales by releasing it earlier. They still get as much holiday sales, plus extra. But if they release in the holidays then they just get the holiday sales and nothing else. Do you see what I'm saying?I don't understand what you mean by "plus extra." Nintendo is going to have a finite amount of units available which bound to sell out by the end of the year. Launching earlier just dilutes those sales over the course of a few extra months. For example, let's say Nintendo has X million units available. They can only sell X million units. They either sell X million units from say September to December or X million units from November to December. If Wii U sells out either way, why wouldn't Nintendo just launch during the holidays when the attach rate on games and accessories are higher because, as previously stated, it's the season when people are far more willing to spend more money? Nintendo increases profits and investors are happy. Personally, I'd love to get it sooner because you know, "Shut up and take my money" but from a business perspective, it make sense to launch in November.
So, to steer this back on topic, I'll change my date guess to November 11, 2012. I'm sticking with my original guess for the price.
How so? Nintendo doesn't have the holiday season to themselves. PS3 and 360 still exist. Sony and Microsoft will have no shortages and all of the 3rd party games, not just the ones 3rd parties felt like porting over. Tomb Raider, for example, is already confirmed to not be coming to Wii U.
I don't understand what you mean by "plus extra." Nintendo is going to have a finite amount of units available which bound to sell out by the end of the year. Launching earlier just dilutes those sales over the course of a few extra months. For example, let's say Nintendo has X million units available. They can only sell X million units. They either sell X million units from say September to December or X million units from November to December. If Wii U sells out either way, why wouldn't Nintendo just launch during the holidays when the attach rate on games and accessories are higher because, as previously stated, it's the season when people are far more willing to spend more money? Nintendo increases profits and investors are happy. Personally, I'd love to get it sooner because you know, "Shut up and take my money" but from a business perspective, it make sense to launch in November.
The Plus More means...that if Nintendo has the system on the market longer, it should have the holiday season launch of November numbers...plus whatever sold in October, September and August. And if Nintendo launched say late September or early September...they should be able to have an initial stock sell out, and still have more than enough units ready for Holiday season. In fact, if consumers believe this item will be hard to find for Christmas, they may start buying it early...so it is like an extended holiday season.That's not really how that works. Consoles, like all electronics, are manufactured on a production schedule which takes months to alter due to signing new contracts, ordering new parts, finding new factories etc. Even if Nintendo launched a few months before November, Nintendo doesn't have more units to sell. Additional units won't be available until next year.
Launching early has no negatives for Nintendo...There is a negative. Launching earlier reduces the number of available units in a highly competitive season when people want to spend money. That means lower profits for Nintendo caused by lower attach rates among other things. When Nintendo launches could be the difference between me with a low attach rate getting one and a dad with spoiled kids with a high attach rate getting one. Multiply that a few hundred thousand times and Nintendo's earnings for that quarter are greatly affected.
If its just to appease investors by meeting with some quarterly time schedule that's stupid. That would hurt them in the long term, even if it does make investors happier in the short term.Stupid or not, that's why Nintendo is doing it. I'm not condemning or supporting that choice; I was just answering your question a few posts up. It is what it is. As a consumer, again "Shut up and take my money." At the same time, I understand that Nintendo does have a responsibility to appease investors to a certain degree since, after all, investors are putting far more money into a company I love than I ever will. I'm taking a neutral stance.
Plus as someone else pointed out, it may be in their interest to release early and then hold back the supply to a trickle to keep the hype and whatnot ramped up, and then when the holidays roll out they can release all that supply they've been holding back and have massive sales.That's certainly a possibility but remember, any units sold before the holiday season is potentially lost revenue from lower attach rates. "Potenially" being the operative word here. Going all out during the holiday season is a proven tactic. That may not be the only way but history has shown that it works so I can see why Nintendo would do that.
They will probably include Wii Sports U with the console.
Wii Sports was basically the game that made a ton of people buy a Wii in the first place. It would be foolish not to include a sequel for the Wii U.
Stupid or not, that's why Nintendo is doing it. I'm not condemning or supporting that choice; I was just answering your question a few posts up. It is what it is. As a consumer, again "Shut up and take my money." At the same time, I understand that Nintendo does have a responsibility to appease investors to a certain degree since, after all, investors are putting far more money into a company I love than I ever will. I'm taking a neutral stance.
Nintendo ignores a lot of the things the investors tell them, but they have to throw them a bone once in a while. It's not good business practice to piss off your shareholders without a good reason.
What if it did launch in mid or late June immediately after E3?Then my original guess would have been correct and I just changed it this morning meaning I wouldn't win this thread. That would kind of suck balls. I was going to press my luck and try the lottery next.
Nintendo struck when the iron was hot with the 3DS. How well did that work out for them? It's not as simple as being out earlier = better. There are a lot of factors involved, which people in this thread have pointed out to you.
Nintendo ignores a lot of the things the investors tell them, but they have to throw them a bone once in a while. It's not good business practice to piss off your shareholders without a good reason.
Its also not a good business practice to not strike while the iron is hot. Nintendo has the first 8th generation console, so they should capitalize on that advantage by launching it as early as possible. It is in the long term interests of the investors that the Wii U succeeds. Nintendo shouldn't dilly dally or assume they've already won, because that's far from certain.
We don't even know that this even would piss off investors. That was something Adrock suggested. For all we know, maybe the investors (or at least some of them) would want Nintendo to launch it earlier.
Nintendo struck when the iron was hot with the 3DS. How well did that work out for them? It's not as simple as being out earlier = better. There are a lot of factors involved, which people in this thread have pointed out to you.
I would argue launching early is what saved the 3DS in the holidays of 2011, because it gave Nintendo ample time to see the demand wasn't there at the $250 price tag and so they had time to cut the price. If Nintendo had waited on the 3DS until the holidays it would have been a disaster, because it would have been poorly received and there would be no time for the price cut. Launching early gave Nintendo a margin of error and room to maneuver.
We don't know what the situation with the Wii U will be yet, but isn't it better if Nintendo gave that some margin of error as well? Waiting until the last minute gives Nintendo no time to change anything, so if the Wii U flops it will flop during the worst possible time of year. If its going to flop at all its better to happen earlier while changes can be made and the holidays can still be salvaged.
Wait, you said first that Nintendo needs 5-6 first party games, then at the end, they only need 1-2 killer first party games. So which is it?
With no new generation competition this year, Nintendo will take their time and launch the system right. Just because some fans of Nintendo think rushing the system out as soon as possible is the right move doesn't make it the right move. Nintendo has learned from the 3DS launch. They will take their time.
Yes, I meant 1 or 2 games that you had to have. Basically the Super Mario 64, the Halo, the Wii Sports, the game that you MUST be the system for.Except it sounds like Nintendo may lose money on the system, so they will want to have as high an attach rate as they possibly can. That means at least 15-20 games available at launch. That means not the N64 with Mario 64 and Pilotwings being the only games available. If you wait a little and launch at or around holiday time, the attach rate will be much more to their liking.
And then 3-4 other games. Heck my original statement said just 5-6 games...including 3rd party at initial day 1 launch as long as they had that must own title and next month there would be a continual stream of games.
I also think the 3rd party support which is bringing a lot of ports out would prefer an earlier launch it would be better for their ports to launch in September away from the holiday big new games for PS3 and Xbox360. In fact with all the potential ports for the WiiU...it would be better to launch earlier and let them have a chance of success so that developer don't cry when a year old game doesn't sell on the system.
Yeah, I'm speculating that if Nintendo can launch earlier with a significant amount of time before Black Friday, they might benefit via a higher attach rate. You have to give early adopters time to play their launch games, and then maybe a month later they'll be tempted to come back to double dip for Black Friday sales or for Christmas.
Nintendo systems usually do not launch with more than 2-3 first party games.
I really don't think Nintendo is going to have many issues with 1st party title attach rate. They're the main reason people buy Nintendo consoles.This.
A third party exclusive is good to have, while a port of a game coming to the 360 and PS3 as well doesn't help as much.
has never ever once been in the red (since the NES),
No, Nintendo was in the red. For the six months that ended September 30, they lost $923 million. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nintendo-sinks-deeper-into-red-in-first-half-2011-10-27 (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nintendo-sinks-deeper-into-red-in-first-half-2011-10-27)
Sluggish Wii sales had part to do with it, and losing money on every 3DS system sold doesn't help (they are doing it to get the system out there and make up it up with software sales of course).
For the hard drive thing, I think they might have tow versions of it. A cheaper model without a hard drive, and a premium model with a hard drive and a sleeker look. No HDD would be the ideal though. You could argue that you can find them really cheap, but are those the good ones? The 5400 RPM ones can cost you around $80, and those are internal ones and kind of slow with only 8MB of cache. The good ones would be the 7200 RPM ones with 16mb of cache. Those are faster but more expensive. PC parts are not as cheap when you want it to do something in specific.
So, what's the advantage of NOT having one? By having moving parts, the system requires a better power supply, which in turn generates more heat, and then you would need a better cooling fan, which then generates more heat and requires a better supply. Cooling systems and power supplies can make the price go up since those are crucial components on your system. It wouldn't be an issue with solid state drives, but those don't offer that much storage space with a ridiculous high price (over $100 for less than 300GB).
It would be better for them to keep the system small since that would help in dissipating the heat faster depending on the design. An inexpensive cooling system would do just fine and keep the cost down, specially if they use a dual core/2 GPUs the way I think they do.
For the hard drive thing, I think they might have tow versions of it. A cheaper model without a hard drive, and a premium model with a hard drive and a sleeker look.I'm still unsure what you mean by "sleeker look." Besides the fact that that's subjective, having 2 designs right out of the gate is confusing. It looks like 2 different products. However, if you mean something like the slim 360s where the design is the same but the hard drive SKUs have a glossy finish and the base SKU has a matte finish, I could see that potentially happening. Still, MS pushes the glossy finish as the premium but I, personally, like the matte look.
So, what's the advantage of NOT having one? By having moving parts, the system requires a better power supply, which in turn generates more heat, and then you would need a better cooling fan, which then generates more heat and requires a better supply.I was always under the impression that the chipset generates the most heat. Hard drives should be able to handle the heat that they create. If Nintendo were to create 2 SKUs (1 with a HDD, 1 without), I'd expect all the other parts to be the same. It costs them more to order different/extra pieces. Honestly, I'm just hoping for a HDD bay like the PS3 that allows for any HDD to be plugged in. It prevents clutter and doesn't use up a whole USB. I have my doubts that it'll happen though.
I think Wii Sports 2 would be a little bit of a cop-out.
I think Wii Sports 2 would be a little bit of a cop-out.
You mean Wii Sports 3, right? Wii Sports Resort is basically "Wii Sports 2". And I really really hate the term "hardcore / core gamer". It's a meaningless label that was perpetuated by the gaming media to differentiate us from casual gamers.
I'm a mainstream gamer, yet I love Wii Sports and WS Resort. I enjoy the Wii Sports games for their simplicity and charm, just like I enjoy Super Mario games for their hop-n-bop action, Metroid for it's sense of isolation on a desolate planet, Zelda for it's adventure and dungeons, etc.
Pikmin will be a game designed to appeal to hardcore and casuals.
What is a "hardcore" gamer? Do they like ultra-violent games that feature healthy online communities (maybe healthy isn't the right word for it)? Or is a hardcore gamer someone who enjoys a damn good immersive, meaty gaming experience? Remember when it used to be the latter and not the former?
No blood or guts, no guns, no deathmatches, capture the flag, swearing, killcams, perks, XP, etc.
FZeroBoyo won being Exactly right.
Luigi Dude $299.99 11/18/2012 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667473#msg667473
Mop it up $299.99 11/18/2012 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667518#msg667518
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg667530#msg667530
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679362#msg679362
FZeroBoyo $350 11/18/2012 http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=34112.msg679419#msg679419
$299.99 for just a system
-or-
$349.99 if it comes with a game/extras
I pretty much nailed it. Predicted the date and price of both bundles.Mop it up is the ultimate winner. No one else can compare. Chozo needs to buy her a Wii U now.$299.99 for just a system
-or-
$349.99 if it comes with a game/extras