No matter how this situation folds out, it is bad for Sega. I am not trying to bash Sega, not at all. I love Sega (now that Nintendo won that battle). I own every Sega console starting with the Master System. Sega has done a lot for gaming, mostly they rivaled Nintendo which forced the Big N to make their games just that much better. If any of you have played Shenmue you know that Sega is easily one of the top 5 game makers. But, that has pretty much been where Sega has ended. I do not understand their game plan. They support Xbox, yet Xbox has a weaker user base in Japan than the Wonderswan! Japan is where Sega will most likely do best in, being from Japan. Also, Sega does make amazing sports titles, all of which are more realistic than EA's, but that is taking on a giant that will never be caught sleeping again. Sony's 989 studios seemed to have EA in the corner with their first efforts on the PS1, but once EA got their act together, there was nothing anyone could do (Konami has the best soccer title ever, yet they won't release it in America because Fifa seems to have that market sealed). Sega has really only stayed afloat the past year/two years with ports to Gamecube and Gameboy Advance. I think a merger with Sammy/Micro$oft/EA/Namco will be bad for Sega. The most likely seems to be Namco, and I still beleive that this is going to be bad. RaBicle said that it would create a dream game of "Tekken VS. Virtua Fighter" Dream game? I am sure this would be a nightmare for Namco/Sega. The two best fighting games under one house. Only one would prevail. One would have to sacrifice itself. Namco has taken forever to release Soul Calibur II. I have heard about this game for years, but they waited to release it so it wouldn't compete with their own Tekken games. They wanted Tekken to run its course, then release SCII. With Virtua Fighter and Tekken being under one company, they would cut one, or release them so far apart, we would have to wait years before the next installment. If they joined the games, they wouldn't be abel to keep the gameplay of both, one would have to sacrifice gameplay. All you would have is a Tekken game with Virtua Fighter characters. Namco would more than likely have the more power of the two companies, which means putting a lot of Sega games on the back burner. Namco wouldn't want Sega's RPG's to compete with its own. It really does create a lot of problems. I see a Nintendo buyout of Sega to be a good thing. I know Nintendo doesn't want to do that, but really the two are much alike. They have the history of battling against one another, and their game lineup is a nice mix. Sega has been very kind to us Cubers with releasing games to fill our voids. We have no RPG's on our wonderful system, Sega (ports) a couple of better than descent RPG's. GCN has recieved many great multi player games (Monkey ball 1/2, and Beach Spikers) and platformers (Sonic games). If you take the Sega games out of the Nintendo library, you won't cry a river in pain, but you will notice gaps that could be filled. Sega is an important asset to Nintendo (imagine saying that 10 years ago!) So, if Sammy/Micro$oft/EA/Namco are the bidders, yeah i want Namco, but Nintendo really should try to dive in and at lease grab Sonic Team.