Nothing against the score except in relation to his other scores. Shouldn't gameplay be a 4 too then? It just seems the 4 makes scoring the other categories irrelevant. Why bother then?
The gameplay is an even split of good and bad for me, even though that even split is altered in the final score.
Well that's the problem. The scoring isn't consistently figured out the same way.
And if the subscores don't have much to do with the final score then why bother with them?
Do I need to know the graphics are a 9 if the game is a 4?
It's a larger issue. NOt just this review mind you.
Kind of like the Animal Crossing review. It got a 10 for lastability, but the author scored it a 7.5 or something overall based on it mostly being the same game as on the DS. That scoring seemed inconsistent too. Hey it's the same game you played, but it will last you a long time?!???!