Although our sources within the industry are few and far between, we do have them and what they are telling us is that Nintendo will be showing off the next Super Smash Bros. game at this year’s E3. On top of that, it’s said that it will be shown for the Wii’s successor. We don’t yet know how true this is, so for now we’ll keep this as a rumor. We also would like to know if the game will be shown in video or playable form. Knowing that Kid Icarus: Uprising for the Nintendo 3DS is almost done, it’s quite possible that Masahiro Sakurai has been working on the next Super Smash Bros. title.
Here’s lookin’ at you E3 2011. I’m sure if this turns out to be true, there will be many a happy gamer at this year’s expo.
Hope its more like Melee... Hopes it more like Melee... Hope it kills off Sonic... Hope its More Like Melee...
If you look back on here you'll notice I was super super excited for Brawl. I actually didn't like Melee to much till a played brawl. Then I like Melee better after going back to it. Melee just feels better and more polished to me. I can't really cite specific examples of why but it does which is counter-intuitive to me because on Paper Brawl should be the clearly superior game.Hope its more like Melee... Hopes it more like Melee... Hope it kills off Sonic... Hope its More Like Melee...
You know, I really didn't mind most of the changes from Melee to Brawl. Slowing it down makes people focus more on mind games than always using the OMG FASTEST character, and things like the smash ball and items can still be turned off, and so can the ridiculous levels if you're tourney-level obsessive. My only real complaint was the whole tripping thing...I can accept additions meant to make it easier for beginners, but not when they way they do so is to punish someone whose taken the time to become better at the game.
I was very happy with Braw' because it got slowed the hell down. But all I care for now is a blanced as possibly fighter...
Also, of the three, Brawl is the most balanced of them.I still think the original has the most balanced characters, but if you're talking overall, Brawl has extremely unbalanced items and stages as well.
and things like the smash ball and items can still be turned off, and so can the ridiculous levels if you're tourney-level obsessive.Just because they can be disabled does not excuse them from being terrible.
and things like the smash ball and items can still be turned off, and so can the ridiculous levels if you're tourney-level obsessive.Just because they can be disabled does not excuse them from being terrible.
I agree that it's no excuse for the levels, but for something like the Smash Ball, why would it bother you so much?The Smash Ball doesn't bother me. It's supposed to be a super-powerful attack and the idea to have one item like that is fine by me. But it doesn't stop there. About half the items in the game are instant KOs, and about a third are practically useless. That leaves about 5-6 items that are helpful with a little skill, but not overpowering. That's my issue.
I think the only thing Brawl really fucked up was the online experience. I pretty much gave up on it immediately.
And Sonic needs to stay, and Mega Man needs to be added.
Or that he be an Insta-Buy DLC.And Sonic needs to stay, and Mega Man needs to be added.
Assuming Smash Bros has been in the works, its possible that Mega Man's odd exclusion from Marvel vs. Capcom 3 might be hinting toward his addition into another "fighting" franchise.
Don't have a ton of faith in that, but throwing it out there as possibility since Capcom's only statement was they seemed to feel he didn't fit in the game (which was odd, since he was in the first two).
We have plenty to say about Smash Bros., and you'll definitely hear more about the franchise in the months to come. For now, we're curious: which of the three games is your favorite?http://m.ign.com/articles/1138536
Assuming Smash Bros has been in the works, its possible that Mega Man's odd exclusion from Marvel vs. Capcom 3 might be hinting toward his addition into another "fighting" franchise.
Don't have a ton of faith in that, but throwing it out there as possibility since Capcom's only statement was they seemed to feel he didn't fit in the game (which was odd, since he was in the first two).
Considering the final Brawl roster was first leaked by a Gamefaqs poster in October 2007, about 3 months before the final game was first released in Japan, I wouldn't be surprised if a place like IGN was able to get some type of information on a new Smash Bros for the Cafe about 6 months before it was suppose to be revealed. Smash Bros is the one Nintendo series where they seem to be unable to prevent leaks from happening.Assuming Smash Bros has been in the works, its possible that Mega Man's odd exclusion from Marvel vs. Capcom 3 might be hinting toward his addition into another "fighting" franchise.
Don't have a ton of faith in that, but throwing it out there as possibility since Capcom's only statement was they seemed to feel he didn't fit in the game (which was odd, since he was in the first two).
The main problem working against Mega Man being in Smash Bros is the fact nobody at Capcom seems to give a sh!t about the series anymore. The only reason Snake got in is because his creator, Hideo Kojima is Konami's top designer and he wanted him in and worked out a deal to get him in. Since the creator of Mega Man has now left Capcom, there's nobody with any real power at Capcom that probably even cares if Mega Man gets in and would be willing to try and work a deal out to get him in.
The only way Mega Man can get in is if he becomes the most requested character for the next Smash Bros like Sonic became for Brawl, which makes Nintendo actually go over to Capcom to asked for their permission to get Mega Man, like they did with Sega for Brawl. The problem with that is the Mega Man franchise has never been anywhere close to the popularity as Sonic. Plus there's been so many different Mega Man series by now, all the different Mega Men will end up splitting the votes, which will make sure none of them come any where close to the top of any list.
If there's a Capcom character that gets in the next Smash Bros, it'll probably be a Street Fighter character since the guy who's currently in charge of Street Fighter, Yoshinori Ono, has stated he'd like to have a vs Nintendo crossover and that he'd like to talk to Sakurai about it. Then when this news started causing rumors to get out of hand, Ono went and apoligized to Iwata himself. So we have the guy in charge of Street Fighter, saying he'd like to contact Sakurai, and has had some contact with Iwata which he says was to apologize. I'd bet good money that Ono has contacted Sakurai and that they've worked out a deal to get Street Fighter character to be a guest star in the next Smash Bros. This might explain why even Nintendo themselves hyped up Street Fighter IV for the 3DS, more then any other third party title. Plus I bet the Cafe will probably get a port of Street Fighter IV: Arcade Edition and Street Fighter X Tekken as well.
So yeah, right now my money is on a Street Fighter character being playable in the next Smash Bros. Which will hopefully allow for Ono to actually do a Nintendo vs Capcom game in the future because of it.
Capcom serves Nintendo 3DS its first real blowIf you had visions of a portable 3D Mega Man in your head when Nintendo released the 3DS, you can forget about it. Capcom has reduced support (http://www.andriasang.com/e/blog/2011/05/23/capcom_ps3_expectations/) for the new system, in addition to the Nintendo Wii and Nintendo DS.
Speaking of IGN & NDA's...I remember hearing this now that you mention it, though if it were that far back, it seems more likely it'd be for the 3DS.Quote from: IGN 12/3/2010We have plenty to say about Smash Bros., and you'll definitely hear more about the franchise in the months to come. For now, we're curious: which of the three games is your favorite?http://m.ign.com/articles/1138536
am I the only one who cant tell the difference between melee and brawl? (gameplay wise)Probz.
Adrock, while I respect your opinion, you and I both know you would have bought an graphical update to Melee with online being the only addition. Maybe what you would buy and what you expect is different, but who's fault is that?
Anyway, I can't see them taking the series any further. The formula is damn near perfected. Like I said before, the only thing they need to do is fix online. SSB is really the only game I think of that at a drop of a hat, I am willing to duel anyone who speaks boldly about their skills. If it's there and doesn't take any effort to setup, I'd bet cash money on myself. That's how great a game SSB's mulitplayer is. Just fix online (with a place for my paypal account ;) ), Nintendo. Just fix online and all the people dissuaded, unimpressed, or even cranky will fall back in line.
and trips. gotta get rid of them trips. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj3L08EFfRo)
Nintendo would be smart to include 16 player co-op for both online and offline multiplayer.
How so? I am thinking of the possibilities of havng a SSB party with that many people on the screen at once. A bigger and badder game.Nintendo would be smart to include 16 player co-op for both online and offline multiplayer.
No. No they absolutely would not. In addition to being impossible to pull off from a networking perspective, the game just plain would not work with that many players.
I actually think Kytim is onto something here. Not with the idea of 16 players..that's hilariously implausible. Not with his stereo idea either, but with the notion that the Super Wii could make for a better "Multiplayer" experience.
If each player has their own screen focused on his or her character with the main screen fixed to view the entire level, that would easily solve the game's biggest problem: losing track of your character.
If each player has their own screen focused on his or her character with the main screen fixed to view the entire level, that would easily solve the game's biggest problem: losing track of your character.
A novel idea, but how do you anticipate the other character's movements towards you, or frantic projectiles if you don't have the view of the entire screen?
If each player has their own screen focused on his or her character with the main screen fixed to view the entire level, that would easily solve the game's biggest problem: losing track of your character.
Brawl was loaded with new content that in hindsight wasn't all that interesting or just plain awful. I admit to having buyers remorse despite how excited I was for Brawl. You're right, that's my "fault" for buying the game if you want to put it in such terms but that wasn't really the point.
Brawl just felt like too much of the same. I'm SSBed out. So for me to care about this one is has to do something different. More than four characters at once would probably do it.
If it was Melee with 17 more characters and a few new modes, stages, and items. We wouldn't be having this discussion but its not.Brawl was loaded with new content that in hindsight wasn't all that interesting or just plain awful. I admit to having buyers remorse despite how excited I was for Brawl. You're right, that's my "fault" for buying the game if you want to put it in such terms but that wasn't really the point.Brawl just felt like too much of the same. I'm SSBed out. So for me to care about this one is has to do something different. More than four characters at once would probably do it.
So adding 17 new characters that weren't in Melee, with 15 of them having completely unique movesets that don't exist in Melee, is too much of the same? All other high profile fighting series are lucky if they even add 3 extra characters between each new installment, and only in rare occasions to you get something as high as 10, but hardly anything as close to 17.
Give me a break. The whole point of Smash Bros is to be a party fighting game that everyone can enjoy where people can play as iconic Nintendo characters with now some third party characters as well. The whole selling point for these games is the new characters that people will be able to play as and Brawl added 17 of them over Melee. If that wasn't enough for some of you then you'll never be happy with anything in life since Brawl already went above and beyond what it was suppose to for the type of game is it.
So adding 17 new characters that weren't in Melee, with 15 of them having completely unique movesets that don't exist in Melee, is too much of the same? All other high profile fighting series are lucky if they even add 3 extra characters between each new installment, and only in rare occasions to you get something as high as 10, but hardly anything as close to 17.
Ugh, every Smash Bros. thread derails into the same tired arguments and people thrashing about their useless opinions.
Why is it called smash brothers if they let girls into it?
You're just not allowed to discuss anything that's ever been argued before or express any useless opinions. Anything else is fair game, until he says otherwise.Wait... You had banned Game Discussion because it was to close to religion but, I guess its now ok. Dasmos hasn't said anything about the banned topics.
Smash Bros. like Homie. If it was Smash Siblings they all be related because their is no generic organizational form of Siblings so, that would mean their is a lot of incest in Nintendoland. Could be Smash Comrades, Smash People, or just Super Smash. Like Pizza Hut was The Hut or Radio Shack was The Shack.Why is it called smash brothers if they let girls into it?
Good point. I think that was also one of the main reasons why Nintendo decided to ultimately drop the Gameboy brand name.
The franchise should be renamed "Smash Siblings". That way it would be gender neutral.
Smash Bros. like Homie. If it was Smash Siblings they all be related because their is no generic organizational form of Siblings so, that would mean their is a lot of incest in Nintendoland. Could be Smash Comrades, Smash People, or just Super Smash. Like Pizza Hut was The Hut or Radio Shack was The Shack.
Duke Nukem confirmed as playable in SSB4?Developement time has been extended 15 years to perfect the model and voice acting.
I'd like to see custom characters. I wonder what version of "Mii" the Cafe will have. Let me give him a bat and hockey mask so I can go around beating peoples asses like Casey Jones.I was sort of Surprised the Mii's didn't make it into Brawl somehow.
Who the **** is Travis Touchdown and why should his no-name ass be in SSB?He's the star of No More Heroes 1 and 2 for Wii.
Wow, for someone who's always complaining about the Wii's 3rd party support, you skipped one of the best 3rd party games this generation across all platforms.
Not this one. From this point forward, any discussion that Dasmos finds unacceptable is strictly prohibited. Unless I say otherwise.
You're just not allowed to discuss anything that's ever been argued before or express any useless opinions. Anything else is fair game, until he says otherwise.Wait... You had banned Game Discussion because it was to close to religion but, I guess its now ok. Dasmos hasn't said anything about the banned topics.
Here is a list of characters that should be in the next SSB game:
Classic Megaman and Megaman X
Classic Sonic and moder Sonic
Jack from Madworld
Travis Touchdown
The Swordsman from Red Steel 2
Kisuke and Momohime from Muramasa
Skyward Sword Link
Lagiacrus from Monster Hunter 3 should make some kind of appearance as well.
Here is a list of characters that should be in the next SSB game:
Classic Megaman and Megaman X
Classic Sonic and moder Sonic
Jack from Madworld
Travis Touchdown
The Swordsman from Red Steel 2
Kisuke and Momohime from Muramasa
Skyward Sword Link
Lagiacrus from Monster Hunter 3 should make some kind of appearance as well.
No really really stupid character suggestions.
something like Haggar from the Final Fight games could be potential fun.
No really really stupid character suggestions.something like Haggar from the Final Fight games could be potential fun.
Oh man, what did I just say?
If No More Heroes was still an exclusive series, then Travis Touchdown's appearance would be more welcome, from me at least. Though I see Ian's point. 3rd party character's need to carry some weight, if they're to be included. My only question is if the philosophy of "they have to come to us" will carry on through the development of SSB4. If not, then we can probably expect more of the same. If not, the question becomes who does Nintendo go for?Travis Touchdown could be a trophy. Maybe even an assist. Thats as far as he should be taken but I do think it wouldn't be unreasonable for that much.
I think L-Block from Tetris should be a playable character.No, that's silliness. The I block was the money block. If any Tetris character makes the cut, it should be the I block.
I think L-Block from Tetris should be a playable character.No, that's silliness. The I block was the money block. If any Tetris character makes the cut, it should be the I block.
Why not Travis? They included Snake who's MIA on nintendo's console for how long? Sure there's the remake and that sold just as poorly as NMH.To tell you the Truth Snake is a kick in the pants as well. When I think of him I think Playstation. Its like putting Bandicoot, Jak and Dexter, Ratchet and Clank, etc. into Smash.
No sense to crap on someone's wish list. Me, I think Nintendo should include more 3rd party characters. Maybe take one character from all the major publishers to show some support.
To tell you the Truth Snake is a kick in the pants as well. When I think of him I think Playstation.
I acknowledge that to be true but, its an obscure reference now. Its like finding out that X favorite actor use to be a minor Mouseketeer.To tell you the Truth Snake is a kick in the pants as well. When I think of him I think Playstation.
This is unfortunate, because he was on Nintendo consoles long before he was on Sony consoles. His popularity just didn't explode until the Sony years.
I'm also thinking that the next Smash Bros. game could go a long way in pleasing the masses by incorporating a speed customizer.
Me, I think Nintendo should include more 3rd party characters. Maybe take one character from all the major publishers to show some support.
Viewtiful Joe. Now their is a character I could get behind because he Started on Nintendo, all his games (From what I can tell), were released on Nintendo first. Also relatively obscure.Me, I think Nintendo should include more 3rd party characters. Maybe take one character from all the major publishers to show some support.
This could be a good idea to lure 3rd party characters. If Nintendo puts in a character from a major 3rd party, that's instant publicity for that character/franchise. Even characters that haven't had their own game in a while (like Viewtiful Joe) would be getting some significant mindshare just from being in Smash Bros. The only flaw is that the 3rd party would have to have a game for that character in the works for Cafe for them to really take advantage.
Megaman( w/ Rush being his way of returning to the platform), Viewtiful Joe & Bomberman should all be in the next Smash Bros.Spyro brand is very tied to Playstation name from his earlier exploits. I honestly thought he was a Sony brand like Ratchet and Clank when those games were out.
Sonic should also return with Tails this time
maybe Spyro the dragon should also join.
Megaman( w/ Rush being his way of returning to the platform), Viewtiful Joe & Bomberman should all be in the next Smash Bros.
Sonic should also return with Tails this time
maybe Spyro the dragon should also join.
Megaman( w/ Rush being his way of returning to the platform), Viewtiful Joe & Bomberman should all be in the next Smash Bros.
Sonic should also return with Tails this time
maybe Spyro the dragon should also join.
Do not forget Knuckles and Shadow. While you are at it include Terry Bogart from the King of Fighters series. Bonk aswell.
I acknowledge that to be true but, its an obscure reference now. Its like finding out that X favorite actor use to be a minor Mouseketeer.
Here is a link to a table showing the chronology of the game but it also shows the systems they were available for. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Gear_(series)#Chronology) The only platform you can play every single one of the games is Sony's and he had 1 NES and GCN appearance with a 3DS one on the way which is a port. If a majority of the games, like Mega Man, was on the NES this would be a different discussion.
Also if I'm reading the history right the NES version was a port from the MSX2, pretty much PC, where it was first released. Effectively Snake has never had an original game on a Nintendo system. They were all Ports.
Did not know about them. So 2 games that didn't get ported.I acknowledge that to be true but, its an obscure reference now. Its like finding out that X favorite actor use to be a minor Mouseketeer.
Here is a link to a table showing the chronology of the game but it also shows the systems they were available for. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Gear_(series)#Chronology) The only platform you can play every single one of the games is Sony's and he had 1 NES and GCN appearance with a 3DS one on the way which is a port. If a majority of the games, like Mega Man, was on the NES this would be a different discussion.
Also if I'm reading the history right the NES version was a port from the MSX2, pretty much PC, where it was first released. Effectively Snake has never had an original game on a Nintendo system. They were all Ports.
Don't forget Snake's Revenge for the NES, and the fantastic Metal Gear Solid GBC game.
Balance patches are a must. Also, more characters like Captain Rainbow, Birdo and Bowser jrNo Just No. IF I could expunge that Character from the Space time Continuum I would.
I don't think any one 3rd party franchise should have more than two representatives. I only say 2 because I would like to see Tails playable. I think there's such a thing as over representation. This isn't a Capcom VS game....Yet
Perhaps not Bowser, jr. But how about the Koopa Kids? Wendy, Ludwig, and I forget the others. You don't see them anymore. Its like Nintendo dropped them out of the cannon. I guess that is Bowser, jr's fault. Maybe he ate them all or soemthing...
Perhaps not Bowser, jr. But how about the Koopa Kids? Wendy, Ludwig, and I forget the others. You don't see them anymore. Its like Nintendo dropped them out of the cannon. I guess that is Bowser, jr's fault. Maybe he ate them all or soemthing...
I wonder if the development team will be as ambitious about the music as Brawl was. Werent there over 300 songs? I just can't ever imagine that kind of thing happening again on an equal or greater level. Some amazing songs came out of that game, that Tetris A them was epic.
I don't know if anyone remembers but the game code containing Plusle and Minum as team characters, Toon Zelda/Shiek, Dixie Kong, and Mewtwo were in the game. I really wouldn't mind a representative from more generations of pokemon than the 1st and last, but double teaming electric mice sound like double Pikachu's and if they do get placed into the game I hope its not at the cost of another completely new character. Same goes for Toon Zelda, there has got to be more deserving characters that are not Link or Zelda in any human form.
As for Ridley, all he needs to be is a Charizard that is slightly bigger. Bowser is huge in Brawl and I don't see why Ridley couldn't be that size with wings folded.
Wario, King Dedede, Pokemon Trainer, Meta Knight and Diddy Kong
And while I'm at it - No. More. Tripping.more at the link
Looking at all the third-party characters people are suggesting, Nintendo should make a separate "Nintendo vs. Third-Parties" edition of Smash Brothers, and keep the main series about Nintendo franchises. It's starting to get way too crowded.
They should make a Smash Bros. All Stars game which has every significant character from every significant Nintendo game ever made. I'm talking like on the order of 100 different characters or something, all with unique move sets. That would be awesome.
Tripping happens in real life, so I am fine with it being in games. It makes it more realistic.I play videogames because they're not realistic. Even games touted as realistic aren't realistic. Silencers don't quiet gunshots to whispers, guards don't forget a massive security breach by an unknown assailant occurred just because they couldn't find him after 30 seconds, Steve Nash doesn't dunk etc. If I wanted realism, I could join the Army or not be Steve Nash on my own time.
guards don't forget a massive security breach by an unknown assailant occurred just because they couldn't find him after 30 seconds
guards don't forget a massive security breach by an unknown assailant occurred just because they couldn't find him after 30 seconds
That happened on PSN.
That happened on PSN.I know you're joking, but considering that whole ordeal cost Sony over a billion dollars in damages, plus the drop in confidence from consumers and 3rd parties, I don't think Sony is forgetting about the PSN crash for quite some time.
That happened on PSN.I know you're joking, but considering that whole ordeal cost Sony over a billion dollars in damages, plus the drop in confidence from consumers and 3rd parties, I don't think Sony is forgetting about the PSN crash for quite some time.
Not if it were the focus of development instead of an uninspired single player mode.They should make a Smash Bros. All Stars game which has every significant character from every significant Nintendo game ever made. I'm talking like on the order of 100 different characters or something, all with unique move sets. That would be awesome.
That would take about 10 years to make.
But isn't the joke that Sony gave up on patching security even after being warned because they didn't find/see the immediate threat. That's what caused the whole crash in the first place.One could argue that this whole thing started because Sony included the OtherOS feature in the first place which, once the dominos fell, apparently led to Anonymous or whatever hacker group bitchslapping PSN, supposedly as a response to Sony suing George Hotz aka PS3 Homebrew Hacker Jesus. Sony could have upped security and made things harder for hackers, but every server is vulnerable. Hackers will find exploits, they always do. Sony didn't forget that there was a problem, they decided it wasn't one worth spending millions fixing which, ironically and justifiably, may cost them billions. They were warned by the hackers and laughed it off (I'm sure every major corporation would have too). They won't ever make that mistake again... or at least I hope they won't. It amazes me that a throw away joke comment basically describing Metal Gear Solid's poor AI (*C4 explodes* "What was that noise? Must have been nothing.") can cause so much trouble.
lack of security and no steps taken to patch holes even though they knew they were vulnerable.
If Super Smash Brothers does come out on the 3DS, I could see Nintendo implementing a augmented reality portion of the game where the player takes pictures of the environment and they become back grounds for battles. For example, take a picture of the seat of your couch and then have Mario and the other characters fight on your couch.
If Super Smash Brothers does come out on the 3DS, I could see Nintendo implementing a augmented reality portion of the game where the player takes pictures of the environment and they become back grounds for battles. For example, take a picture of the seat of your couch and then have Mario and the other characters fight on your couch.
No way Nintendo will do that. Just consider all the explicit things you could take pictures of and possibly use as stages with people online or even offline.
Offline mode is what I had in mind. The thought of Mario fighting on someone's backside is just too damn funny!
Offline mode is what I had in mind. The thought of Mario fighting on someone's backside is just too damn funny!
And it would be equally hilarious when Smash Bros. appeared in the news as part of a story about a pedophile who decided to show a kid their "Smash Bros. game" using their genitalia as a stage background over local Wi-Fi. Sure, people can already do this with phones and cameras, but Nintendo wouldn't dare risk damage to their image and their brand with a feature like that. It's not a bad idea, but I just don't see Nintendo taking that sort of risk in a brand so closely associated with official Nintendo mascots.
Hey Kytim, is 89 your IQ? You're hurting my head, please stop.I was playing a little bit of Battletoads in Battlemaniacs and thought that it would make a good addition to the SSB roster, but then reality dawned on me.
Offline mode is what I had in mind. The thought of Mario fighting on someone's backside is just too damn funny!
And it would be equally hilarious when Smash Bros. appeared in the news as part of a story about a pedophile who decided to show a kid their "Smash Bros. game" using their genitalia as a stage background over local Wi-Fi. Sure, people can already do this with phones and cameras, but Nintendo wouldn't dare risk damage to their image and their brand with a feature like that. It's not a bad idea, but I just don't see Nintendo taking that sort of risk in a brand so closely associated with official Nintendo mascots.
Offline mode is what I had in mind. The thought of Mario fighting on someone's backside is just too damn funny!
And it would be equally hilarious when Smash Bros. appeared in the news as part of a story about a pedophile who decided to show a kid their "Smash Bros. game" using their genitalia as a stage background over local Wi-Fi. Sure, people can already do this with phones and cameras, but Nintendo wouldn't dare risk damage to their image and their brand with a feature like that. It's not a bad idea, but I just don't see Nintendo taking that sort of risk in a brand so closely associated with official Nintendo mascots.
After thinking about that a bit more I realized that while you do have a point, the fact of the matter is if a pedophile is close enough to a kid to show his genitalia in the game through local offline mode then he is also close enough to the kid where he doesn't really even need the game to show his genitalia (or do worse things than that even).
The bottom line is pedophiles need to be kept far away from children period. So with that said, maybe allowing it in local multiplayer isn't such a bad idea because if a pedophile is really in the same room as a kid then there are far worse things to worry about than what happens in a video game. Do you see what I'm saying?
i just got through the first area of Super Princess Peach and I bought all here Umbrella moves at that point. I have to say the next Smash should base Princess Peach totally off of that game and make the current Princess Peach move set go to Daisy with more of a Sports tweak to it because that always felt a little more Daisy-ish anyways.
The Mario side already has the most representatives so I don't really see any more from that series getting in. All the more reason I'd like to see franchise-specific versions of the game.
Who else is really deserving of it anyway?
In that case, Adam Malkovich should be in Smash Bros. so he can authorize Samus' use of the Wave Beam.
You know who would be an absolutley pimp addition to the roster? Ray MkIII from Custom Robo Arena. Or any other of the Ray models from the older games.This. Yes! And also... Jill from Drill Dozer! She'd make a great addition, too!
For possible Mario characters my bets are on Bowser Jr, Daisy or Waluigi. I mean, those are the three major characters that have appeared in all the Mario spinoff games since 2002 that haven't been playable in Smash Bros yet. If there's going to be a new Mario character, it will be one of those 3.What makes them major characters? I mean, Waluigi hasn't even appeared in a mainline game in either the Mario or Wario series, he was created for a spin-off and appears only in spin-offs. They're certainly not on the same levels as the characters already in Smash Brothers, though Bowser Jr. might be close since he's become a recurring villain in Mario platformers. As for the other two, I'd argue that Toad is higher up than them. He's been around since the original Super Mario Brothers and has appeared in nearly every Mario game since, plus he's starred in his very own game before. That's more than I can say of the other three.
For possible Mario characters my bets are on Bowser Jr, Daisy or Waluigi. I mean, those are the three major characters that have appeared in all the Mario spinoff games since 2002 that haven't been playable in Smash Bros yet. If there's going to be a new Mario character, it will be one of those 3.What makes them major characters? I mean, Waluigi hasn't even appeared in a mainline game in either the Mario or Wario series, he was created for a spin-off and appears only in spin-offs. They're certainly not on the same levels as the characters already in Smash Brothers, though Bowser Jr. might be close since he's become a recurring villain in Mario platformers. As for the other two, I'd argue that Toad is higher up than them. He's been around since the original Super Mario Brothers and has appeared in nearly every Mario game since, plus he's starred in his very own game before. That's more than I can say of the other three.
Bowser Jr. probably has the best chance especially since he was pretty much the main villain in both Super Mario Sunshine and New Super Mario Bros. At the same time, Browser Jr. is fucking awful. I'd prefer Daisy though.
I just said Toad would make more sense, since he appeared in more games. I'll not comment on anything else since you like Bowser Jr.I like you both. But Mop it up more because she's a birdo :P
To make matters worse, there is also a "Koopa Kid" character who has appeared in some of the Mario Party games and looks like Baby Bowser/Bowser Jr, yet is apparently a different character as well.You know him being a generic character I think would make it more likely to get one. What would be more interesting is a Koopa that changes between the varieties.... His save being wings and do shell things but, be able to shift to a Magi-Koopa with a different move set.
As for Kamek, he's just Magikoopa. They gave him a unique name in North America versions but in Japan there is no distinction between him and any other Magikoopa. So even though he plays a role in the Yoshi games, I don't see him making the cut in Smash Brothers since he's still a generic enemy.
The question I have is who is Bowser Jr.'s mother? Perhaps Kytime's old avatar has the answer.Why do you think Bowser keeps kidnapping Peach? I just wonder if Mario's figured it out yet...
Yeah, an Assist Trophy would make more sense, though I personally don't like those and turned them off.But it was proven that she is not the mother of the Koopa Kids. Maybe Bowser is like Godzilla.The question I have is who is Bowser Jr.'s mother? Perhaps Kytime's old avatar has the answer.Why do you think Bowser keeps kidnapping Peach? I just wonder if Mario's figured it out yet...
I want to see Little mac, dixie, and Ridley
Regarding planners, Sakurai noted that he's headed up all areas of game balance and character strength settings for past Smash Bros. This time, he's hoping to leave this area to the staff.
It sounds like the 3DS version is going to be more of a single player focused gameWhat the **** is the point of that? The only reason I played the single player mode in past Smash Bros. games was so I could unlock ****. The vast majority of Smash Bros. fans only care about Free-For-All and possibly the Special Multiplayer Modes. In Brawl, the Subspace Emissary was utter garbage and since that was the easiest way to unlock characters, that made the Solo Mode even more useless. Just focus on multiplayer, online and local, and they stand to please 99% of the fanbase.
"I can't say that it's entirely out of the realm of possibility that some Capcom character could appear in the next Smash Bros. The big problem, though, comes from the idea of trying to get characters from a completely different universe to fit with the style that has been dictated by Nintendo's characters in a fighting game.
"In fact, I actually think it's a miracle that we got Smash Bros. and all the Nintendo characters to work together in the first place. Especially when you bring Pokemon into the mix and a lot of the complications that are caused by that being an almost completely different entity on its own, it's really something. So this is something that obviously will come up more as we get started on the new Smash Bros. development, but keeping those things in mind I think is important."
Nintendo Power: There was a rumor at one point about Ridley being playable. Was that ever a consideration?
Sakurai: I think that would probably be pretty impossible. [Laughs] If we had put our best efforts into it, we may have been able to do it. But he might have been a little slow. Would that be all right? [Laughs]
