Why should I admit I was wrong when I'm not? Pirating simply does NOT take that big of a chunk out of console gaming sales- all those articles saying it does are just propoganda to get people to stop doing it. The money lost each year to pirating is pocket change compared to how much is made, and the simple fact of the matter is that pirating did NOT kill the Dreamcast. Like I said, most owners of the console didn't take the time to modify their Dreamcast to play games because buying them wasn't a hassle at all.
"the dreamcast stop producing games becuase they thought it was pointless, which it was. "
Developers stopped making Dreamcasr games because they weren't selling because NO ONE OWNED A DREAMCAST. Sony's PS2 hype killed the Dreamcast- barely antyone bought a Dreamcast because they were waiting for a PS2, and THAT'S why the Dreamcast failed, not beause of a collection of gaming nerds without girlfriends who think they're being rebels by burning games instead of buying them. Face facts- pirating did not kill the Dreamcast. It may have been a problem, but it's not what was the ultimate cause of the Dreamcast's failure and Sega's end as a console maker. When did you guys get this crap in your heads?
Look, if pirating really does make consoles die, why is the PSX the best selling home console of all time when it was easy as hell to pirate games on it? Doesn't make sense, does it?