I'll pull it up. I have been up all night so I will correct some of the mistakes I made before hand. Since I'm dropping words. (Oh I forgot about the size of the disc thing he brought up..)
___________________________________________
As I said the example was faulty. As for the Gamecube being their last chance isn't true, Nintendo is still the most profitable of the three major corporations involved in the market. And as for the other amenities of the other systems, it did the job this generation because DVDs were an emerging technology.
But that wasn't the point of my post; the point was that it a small business can break open a market. The reason why the smaller companies now cant get in, is the video game market it now an oligopoly and it costs a lot to enter the market. Microsoft found that out, they still haven't made up the money they have invested into the Xbox. (R&D, software procurement, Xbox live setup, developer buyouts, advertising, promotions, and the market model that you lose money on every console before you add in the free games.)
If you want to talk more about this contact me via email.
____________________
I guess it just sounded a little better in context and in my sleep deprived state. The professor commented again saying that he learned something about the game industry in the exchange.