You are getting crap for it, Bill, because you yourself did not make your context known and with your short quip appear to be defending it, which makes your friends re-evaluate their perception of you.
If the target was UBISoft, they should have made a comic about UBISoft. Instead they tried to passively make fun of UBISoft by calling a woman who works for UBISoft a whore, making fun of her broken English, and hoping the reader would make the connection to UBISoft in some way. They failed miserably as evidenced by the uproar it caused. Ultimately, It doesn't matter what UBISoft's PR department is figuratively guilty of. She does not deserve this for any reason and it is completely indefensible. By the VERY SAME STROKE that made her a figurehead for a UBISoft game, she has again been made responsible for all of UBISoft's actions in this comic, making the artists guilty of the very same "damn, sad truth."
Imagine I made a comic in which Bill Aurion goes around molesting 6 year old boys because he likes them. Having sex with them is the best thing in the world for Bill. He gets caught but his rich parents relocate him to another university and he molests 3 year old boys. Finally he gets caught by the public at large and his parents bring him home, to live out his life in his hometown in another country, never seeing justice in America.
I'm criticizing the way the Catholic Church shuffled child-molesting priests around in the U.S. before finally recalling them all back to the Vatican, before they could see American justice. But instead of actually criticizing them, I'm just criticizing Bill, by calling him a pedophile and symbolically linking him to the Catholic Church (Bill's a Catholic, btw. I should probably have pointed this out during the comic, but it would ruin the commentary). Now I'm not saying it was the right way to do that criticism of the Catholic Church or that it was presented in a tasteful manner, but it is the damn sad truth that the Catholic Church relocated pedophiles.