Good review, bought game hope it's as good as you claim.

Nice review! You have me intrigued, now.

Did you encounter any split seconds of slowdown, Neal? Had some quick bouts of it (maybe once or twice an hour) when attacking or jumping. Wasn't anything to detract from the game, though.

Anyway, I really am liking this game. It's much a friendlier Zelda II, I think, with some great level design.

Glad to see it reviewed so positively.  I was thinking of getting this.  I will pick it up for sure now.

I am two hours into it already, most time I spent on any Wii U game that isn't Super Mario 3D World. It is very satisfying as a Zelda 2 knock off, not quite as odd as Neutopia was but it certainly fills a void.

I've had it on my Steam wishlist since I saw it on Super Bunny Hop's "games from my Inbox" video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9AmX1Qfzpg). Maybe I should just take the plunge.

Added to my wishlist...will definitely play it on a rainy day.

Ok I guess I'm buying this one!

Put some time into this game last night, and the game overall just makes me shrug in indifference. The game seems to have almost no signposting, giving you no idea where you're meant to go to continue the quest. You collect items, but you're given no idea what they're used for (such as the "Ancient Key", which opened a door eventually but it took me trying 5 different locked doors in 3 different locations before I found the door it belonged to). I've also run into some weird bugs where you can teleport across the map if you exit a screen by falling into the screen's edge instead of walking through it.  The game's OK, but I don't get the praise for this one.

Just bought it, fun game. It seems like a mash of Kid Icarus and Legend of Zelda.

It is a throw back to the old school NES days. Games used to be like that and we ate them up. Ever tried beating original Legend of Zelda NES without a walk through or going on line first? Having to figure things out makes solving the puzzle more rewarding, games today just hold your hand and give you infinite re-tries until you get to the final cut scene because the story is more important than the actual game.

Also have you tried actually talking to the NPC's? They offer clues to what to do without actually coming out and telling you. I love it for that. I hate games where they tell you exactly what to do that is annoying.

Here's my problem with that mindset: it's not the 1980s anymore. We don't have shitty hardware like the NES to work with now, we don't typically have our programmers multi-tasking as level and scenario designers anymore, and Shovel Knight exists. Shovel Knight was also a love letter to that same time period, but with as much as it embraced the style of that era, it also incorporated advances in level and game design we've made since then. It was a modern game, and it didn't delight in wasting my time. I always knew where I needed to go and what I needed to do. The challenge was in doing it, not in trying to analyze the deranged mind of an indie developer. If I wanted deliberately obscure nonsense, I'd go play a 90s point & click adventure game, and probably have more fun doing it.

Elliot Quest, by comparison, is a faithful recreation of a less-than-stellar Zelda game (to put it kindly), and it delights in obscuring basic concepts like signposting the critical path.  Sorry, but I don't have the time for that bullshit anymore. If a game's going to let me waste time bumping around the world map trying to guess where it wants me to go next, there are better uses for my time. You can nudge a player in the right direction without turning the game into Fi from Skyward Sword.

Yes, and with the exception of the one NPC who asked me to get his bomb bag and nudged me towards a nearby cave, I've found most NPCs about as useful as "I Am Error."

Like I said, Elliot Quest isn't a bad game. It's just that to me the absolute worst thing a game can do is waste my time. If I'm going to sit down and play a game for an hour, I want to feel that I've made progress. The game's an homage to one of the worst eras of game design, and that just doesn't click with me like it obviously has others.

If you're worried about wasting your time you should probably stop playing games there, Broodwars.

Not surprised some don't like the total '80s throwback confusion. I totally get where you are coming from, brood. I just wound up being far more positive about it.

Well, Neal got through the confusion and was able to enjoy what comes out of that. Broodwars quit early and never saw most of the good stuff. So you can both agree that the game needs a little more direction, yet come out completely different on the overall evaluation.


Lesson: keep playing!

Well broodwars I don't know this for sure but I bet a lot of developers have to actually think about how much hand holding they want to do. Not trying to be condescending here. I get where you are coming from but not everyone wants a guide and enjoys playing games themselves so I do wonder if that is actually part of the process.

You don't have to "get" the praise for the game. Even if you don't like crappy 80's games many do and this game sounds like it does it well.

(Neal was right.)

A patch is coming to fix an issue where exiting from one area would take you completely across the map to another part of the world. Thank goodness because I thought my eyes were deceiving me when it happened to me on my play-through!