Although Gameblog was just upholding integrity, is it weird that I don't blame Activision for doing what they did? If you don't comply to the companies request, it is fully within their right to cease any relationship they might have. I mean, I would be angrier at Activision if they just said "It's okay that you don't respect our request (unlike other companies), so we'll just forget it and give you the same relationship that we're giving these other companies". I personally believe Gameblog has no reason to post a story on this in the first place. It's within Activisions grasp to cut off ties, but it's up to Gameblog to decide how much they need that relationship in the first place. If it's important enough to do a story, it's important enough to try to patch things up instead of crying for attention.

I am no company, but I can say that the move I made would have been exactly the same as Activision. And I hate Activision.

This is the reason why I am interested. No one makes a better COD game than these guys. I still haven't played MW3 and I'm not really interested in it either, because the MW series is made by Infinity Ward and those guys aren't as good at making quality COD games.

What's the source of this figure? From numbers I can find, it sold 12 million on XBox 360, 3.2 million on PS3, and less than 1 million on Wii, DS, and PC. That would make the total no more than 18 million.

Last time I checked, Modern Warfare still had Call Of Duty attached to the title.

I know. What is your point? My point is that the Modern Warfare series is garbage. The good CODs are made by Treyarch (Black Ops, World at War). Treyarch doesn't make MW.