Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Adrock

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 407
1151
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 11:01:45 PM »
Smaller moves:  Mike Muscala is heading to the Thunder, Pels are looking to sign Derrick Favors, Mario Hezonjia is heading to the Trailblazers for a 1 year minimum with a player option.
And Nerlens Noel was returning to the Thunder before asking for more time. “jkjkjk LOL! Teams still have cap space.”

1152
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 10:35:29 PM »
I would have preferred Dragić. And he only has one year left of it doesn’t work out.

1153
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 10:27:53 PM »
Looks like Jimmy Butler is going to Miami in a sign and trade. Josh Richardson heading to the 76ers. 4 year for Butler.
This trade also sends Goran Dragić, Luka Dončić‘s former roommate, to the Mavericks for salary matching purposes. The Heat are hard capped this year, but Hassan White is off the books next summer. Not screwed, but Butler’s first year may be rocky. EDIT: Shams is saying not. EDIT 2: he deleted the tweet.

Fun Fact 1: In 2013, Jimmy Butler said he’d never wear a Miami Heat Jersey.

Fun Fact 2: The Heat retired #23 for Michael Jordan, a player who never played for the team. No worries. Jimmy Butler wore #33 at Marquette. The Heat retired #33 in 2009, Alonzo Mourning’s number.

Who knows which number Butler will choose? The Heat should let him wear #3 because they clearly have no idea what they’re doing.

1154
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 09:30:29 PM »
76ers did well.

With Durant, Irving, and Butler off the board, the Clippers plan to pair Kawhi Leonard with another superstar is off the table unless they somehow snag Klay Thompson. The Warriors offered him the max, weird that we haven’t heard anything yet.

Per Chris Haynes, Leonard is apparently not taking meetings today, meaning fanbases will have to way another day or two to post the “What it do, baby!” clip.

1155
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 07:45:06 PM »
I’m a big Julius Randle fan, but damn, I wish he went to almost any other team but the Knicks (or Celtics). Glad he got paid though.

1156
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 07:37:41 PM »
Per Chris Broussard a couple hours ago: “Kawhi is “Lakers to lose,” I’m told. Not done deal yet, but Lakers are his top choice.”

We’ll see.

Unrelated: The Pacers made some great moves today. Imagine if the Bucks lose to the Pacers in the playoffs next year.

1157
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 07:22:36 PM »
Per Ramona Shelburne, “The Knicks and owner Jim Dolan were not prepared to offer Kevin Durant a full max contract due to concerns over his recovery from the Achilles injury.”

🤷‍♀️

1158
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 06:27:03 PM »
A lot of guys getting paid. This is 2016 Part II: The Reckoning.

1159
General Chat / Re: NBA Thread: about to take our talents to Brooklyn
« on: June 30, 2019, 05:31:51 PM »
“This fall, I’m gonna take my talents to... what’s that? Woj reported this 40 minutes ago?”

1160
Celtics Seek Three-Way Sign-And-Trade With Nets, Hornets

Part of me wants the Nets to request three first round picks and a swap.

1161
Kyrie Irving and Kemba walker are going to ink their deals with the Nets and Celtics respectively at 6:01 PM even though teams would absolutely never temper under any circumstances whatsoever. Kevin Durant probably follows suit a few hours later. I have him joining Kyrie on the Nets.

Kawhi is a mystery. I think he probably makes a decision within 24 hours because so many people are waiting on him. It’s less about front offices than it is about other players. They’re in limbo if he drags his decision out. Kawhi likely knows where he’s going, just keeps his cards close to the vest.

Jimmy Butler apparently wants to go to the Heat. They’d require a sign-and-trade. Not sure that happens. The Sixers don’t have to oblige though they could always use more assets. They should offer him the full five-year max, and he should take it. Not really sure what happens here. If Butler takes the max, over at 6:01 PM. If a sign-and-trade is required, maybe a few days but he’s off the board.

1162
Lakers Plan C = The Return of D-Lo
You don’t say no if Kawhi comes knocking, but man, I’d love to see D’Angelo Russell back on the Lakers. I still follow all the former young core. I’m going to be rooting for the Pelicans. Haymakers aside, I remain a fan of Brandon Ingram.

Jimmy Butler is going to get a max contract. I’m on the fence on giving him one because the end of that contract may be dicey. Still, if you’re trying to win today, you could do a lot worse than Jimmy Buckets so let future you deal with aftermath if you can get a championship first.
The cap was only $100,000 short of where the Jazz needed it. Looks like our backup backup Point Guard, Raul Neto, will be the guy on the chopping block. No big loss, really, but it's a bad sign for the upcoming Free Agency Period.
Of course, it is because **** the Jazz. Now watch Raul Neto have a breakout year earning Most Improved Player and/or the Lou Williams award Sixth Man of the Year.

1163
I saw it on ESPN about the Magic and Jennie part of it. I guess from my understanding now is that Magic can't formally be in the room for a official meeting with the Lakers organization but he can do something on his own.
Just an addendum on this. According to Tania Ganguli, NBA rules don't prevent teams from bringing in non-employees to free agent pitches. The league just didn't want Magic Johnson specifically involved in Lakers free agent meetings because of the bad optics. It would be as if Johnson quit just so he could tamper on his own time, unhindered by the collective bargaining agreement.
Re: Kawhi as a first option on the Lakers, I don't see it.  Has LeBron ever ceded control?
He just gave up his number for Anthony Davis. It sounds insignificant, but that matters to players. LeBron hasn't had to cede control because he was always the best player on the team which would no longer be true on a team Leonard and Davis. Dwyane Wade famously deferred to LeBron in Miami, and it got them two championships. That said, he's seen it first hand. I certainly have some doubts and understand why others would. At the same time, LeBron is 34 and seems far more self-aware than say, Kobe who was jacking up 20 shots a game at the end of his career.
Quote
Also, if Kawhi just wants to win, how appealing is a team with 10 minimum contracts vs rolling back with the defending champs in a season where most of their biggest opponents will likely be down a player or two from last year?
This is a hilariously reductive comparison. You very blatantly refused to mention he'd be joining two top seven players at worst. You guys can keep dunking on minimum contracts, but again, salary doesn't dictate skill or contribution. That's true across the entire spectrum. Kemba Walker is going to get paid the same amount of money as Kawhi Leonard next season. No one puts them on the same pedestal. Steph Curry is on a supermax contract now yet he's grossly underpaid and he's only earning ~$2 million more than Chris Paul. Just because someone signs a contract for X dollars doesn't mean that's how much they're worth.

The Raptors were one Steph Curry shot from a Game 7. It was a series they rightfully won under the circumstances, and rightfully would not have won under different circumstances. Ultimately, the Raptors are the defending champs so rolling it back with roughly the same team next year is an appealing option. My point is joining the Lakers is also an appealing option just for different reasons. Dismissing that option by focusing on minimum contracts as well as downplaying or even flat-out disregarding the benefits of joining two of the best players in the league is bad a look, man.

1164
Given that most playoff rotations shorten to 8 players, that means the Lakers, after signing 1 max player and 1 MLE player, would need 3 extra players worthy of playoff minutes that would also agree to sign for league minimum contracts.
There’s no shortage of thirsty vets chasing their first ring. There’s no shortage of vets who made the bulk of their earnings already and are just looking for a winning situation and/or meaningful playing time. The Lakers overpaid Rajon Rondo knowing they’d star-chasing so they could sign him for the minimum this season. Off the bench, sure. Playoff Rondo® is a real thing. There are always players on the buy-out market. If a team is good at scouting (and the Lakers are), there’s value overseas, the G-League, and the so-called “NBA Scrapheap.” People forget Wayne Ellington played for the Lakers in 2014-2015 on a minimum contract. Spencer Dinwiddie was unceremoniously tossed away before the Nets gave him a chance. He’s been playing for peanuts the last couple years before getting a decent extension in December.

I’m not saying the Lakers will find a diamond in the rough like Dinwiddie. Bench players getting meaningful minutes will absolutely be available for the minimum on a superteam. Maybe they take the minimum for one year, get their ring then **** off. A team with three superstars in a big, warm-weather market can literally do this every year. Or they can do wink-and-nod deals and pay them on the backend when they get their Bird rights.

1165
Either way there's legitimate reasons why Kahwi would be reticent to join the Lakers, including willingly taking on the third role after leading a Toronto squad. Bomani and Pablo lay it out perfectly. Possible 10(!) guys on minimum contracts!

https://twitter.com/bomani_jones/status/1144712073466777600?s=20
And there are legitimate reasons why he shouldn't reticent to join the Lakers.

1. Why would Kawhi Leonard be the third option when he's better than both James and Davis at this point in their careers? James was better and maybe Davis will be better. The third option take doesn't make any sense from a basketball standpoint yet I haven't heard any analyst bring this up. If he signed with the Lakers, he would immediately be the first option on most nights. Maybe it would be Davis sometimes depending on the matchup.

Also, here's Leonard himself saying, "I just want to win, I don't care about being the best player."

2. Whether Kawhi Leonard should join a superteam when he led his team to a championship goes both ways. These analysts keep ignoring the fact that the 2019 Finals went to six games despite the Warriors losing two starters. The Raptors had to triple team Steph Curry and they still almost lost Game 6. The Finals were a cautionary tale regarding superteams, but we know they work. What are the chances that two superstars go down with catastrophic injuries in the same series?

Kawhi Leonard doesn't have anything else to prove. If he joins a superteam, no one is going to give him **** like they did with Kevin Durant. If Leonard cares primarily about winning and career longevity, he should join a superteam even if it isn't the Lakers. It's just easier on your body when you don't have carry so much. There were times in these playoffs when Leonard just looked tired. Dude is 28. Analysts and retired players like to dunk on superteams and wax nostalgic about the competitiveness of the 80s and 90s. We're in a different era now.

3. Who cares if the Lakers have to sign a bunch of players on minimum contracts? There are players who are overpaid and underpaid every year. Salary doesn't dictate skill or contribution. I don't like that players take less money. More importantly, we all know that they do for whatever reason.

"Depth" is like eight or nine deep and only 13 players can be on the active roster a night. It wouldn't be that difficult to find decent minimum contract role players after using the mid-level exception.

Anyway, I'm fascinated by but not sold on Kawhi Leonard signing with the Lakers. I just have a hard time taking these tired, one-sided takes seriously week after week. Honestly, I'm conflicted. A team led by Leonard, Davis, and James would be fun to watch but they'd be a lot more fun to watch against a fully loaded, healthy Warriors team which we won't get this upcoming season.

1166
There it is.
Quote
Leonard, who is expected to speak to the Lakers in the next few days, had made a personal request that only owner Jeanie Buss and Johnson, the team's former president of basketball operations, be involved in the meeting, sources told ESPN's Stephen A. Smith.
1. Word-diarrhea pours out of Stephen A.’s mouth all the time.

2. Someone doesn’t know the rules whether it’s Stephen A. or his sources. Non-employees/celebrities show up in pitch videos all the time. I guess it’s possible the NBA doesn’t monitor who physically sits in the free agent meeting. Or Jeanie Buss is leaking more fake stories...

1167
So I was reading about Kawhi's meeting with the Lakers and Lebron, AD, Magic and Jennie Buss were planning on meeting him but Kawhi himself has requested that only Magic and Jennie be there at the meeting. So it seems he is all business with the meeting.
That sounds made-up. Magic Johnson doesn’t work for the Lakers anymore. Yeah, non-employees have shown up during pitches. It’s still odd. Unless it was a troll request from Leonard’s camp, inviting only Buss and Johnson doesn’t make sense. Jeanie, by her own admission, isn’t that knowledge on the basketball side, and Magic isn’t involved with the team at all. Why wouldn’t at least Rob Pelinka be at the meeting?

EDIT: To clarify, I’m not saying you made it up. I saw this which mentions Magic and Jeanie meeting Leonard’s camp. It also mentions a source telling Sam Amick of The Athletic that James and Davis plan on being part of the pitch.

*puts on conspiracy theory hat*
Jeanie has been railing against the media and fake stories for months. What if, in the last month, she’s been leaking fake stories to the media? She’s one of the brightest business minds in the league. It wouldn’t surprise me if she decided to take matters into her own hands and let the media work to her advantage. For example, leak stories about Pelinka being grossly inept regarding the salary cap (despite all evidence to the contrary) so other teams have no idea what’s going on within the organization.

1168
Most likely true... but wouldn't Klay be a perfect fit next to AD and James? Doesn't need the ball, lethal shot, tough defense, and incredibly durable.
He would, but he also isn’t playing again until February or March. If the Lakers use the rest of their cap space on a single player, it would be prudent to spend it on someone who is ready to play at the beginning of the season.

That said, assuming Kawhi Leonard signs elsewhere and the Lakers have a chance to sign Klay Thompson, they would probably sign him and figure out the rest later.

1169
James is giving Davis #23. Last season, James wore #23 in games and #6 in practice which I didn’t understand because Lance Stephenson wore #6. He should wear #24 and act like it isn’t a big deal.

He probably wears #6 this season. Also, the Lakers probably re-sign Lance Stephenson. Who needs Kawhi Leonard? Make ‘em dance, Born Ready! 82-0!

1170
The idea of a team, even a team I like, having three top seven players in the league (at worst) is kind of gross to me.

That said, the Lakers apparently have a meeting with Kawhi Leonard. I would have six people in the room: Jeanie Buss, Rob Pelinka, Frank Vogel, LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and Kobe Bryant.

Here’s the pitch: Pelinka opens by staying the max contract is on the table and that Leonard will unquestionably be the first option. Buss, Vogel, James, and Davis state they’re all on the same page. Vogel, James, and Davis talk shop, how Leonard fits into what they’re planning to do (offense, defense, scheduled “rest days” etc. etc.). Bryant and Leonard are apparently close friends, they work out together etc. etc. Bryant talks about how the Lakers took care of him after his Achilles injury and how they always take care of their superstar players etc. etc. James and Davis bring out a list of players they’ve tampered with spoken to who have agreed to join on minimum deals if Leonard signs.

It has to be about basketball, what matters to Leonard, and what the Lakers can do/have done that the Spurs/Raptors didn’t and other teams can’t. One of the low-key best things going for the Lakers is that they gave Bryant a near-max contract back when he clearly wasn’t worth that much as a current player because of how much he meant to the team and city and how grossly underpaid he was considering how much money he brought in. Contrast that to how Leonard views the Spurs. They didn’t want to give him the supermax while dunking all over him regarding his injury.

1171
According to Woj, Lakers now have max cap space after the Wizards agreed to take on Wagner, Bonga, and Jones. Davis is waiving his trade bonus. According to David Aldridge, the Wizards are sending the Lakers cash in the trade.

1172
Only if Durant wanted to recuperate on the Warriors dime and was worried about teams not wanting to sign him for the max despite missing the entirety of next season.

Except he’s Kevin Durant and 30 out of 30 teams would take that chance even with the worst injury a basketball player can have. I’ve read reports that the Warriors are even considering signing him to the five-year max with the promise of trading him to his destination of choice as kind of an olive branch/act of good faith for everything he did for the organization while also not losing him for nothing. It’ll be hard for the Warriors to improve otherwise with Steph Curry’s super-max contract as well as Klay Thompson’s most likely max contract (and probably Draymond Green’s max contract).

It would benefit both sides though Durant could easily just say “**** y’all” anyway and sign with the Knicks/Nets because injury or not, he’s Kevin Durant and teams will be all like, “Whatever you say, Mr. Durant.”

1173
The input lag was the first thing I noticed and the only thing that has really bothered me so far. I thought it was weird when I somehow kept not hitting some purple lanterns on Galleon Minerva (the boat). I adjusted my timing just to get through the section, but I shouldn’t have to. Keeping input lag to a minimum is the most basic expectation for any video game. I’ve only run into one minor bug in which the dialog box stopped displaying words while spoken dialog continued. 505 Games acknowledged others so definitely need to fix those.

I’ve seen video of Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night running on a PS4 Pro so I admit there’s a little graphics-envy. However, the Switch graphics while docked are fine. I can live with it as long as I can see Miriam and the enemies clearly. The graphics while undocked looked okay, but I’m never playing undocked and only tried it to see what it’d look like. It would be nice if the developers cleaned up the Switch version with these patches.

30 frames per second is also fine if it remained consistent which it apparently does not. I haven’t gotten to any of the more effects intensive areas of the game to really see severe dips. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night had many instances of noticeable slowdown (e.g. beat any boss and watch the Life Max Up item appear) so I’m a little more forgiving of this. Still, definitely fix this if at all possible. I wonder if Koji Igarashi/505 Games can get permission from Nintendo to use Switch’s higher GPU speeds.

1174
Here’s how misinformation spreads:

Quote from: Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports
Right now, Cleveland is trying to trade JR Smith and whichever teams that trades for him will waive him. When he's waived, it is my belief he'll end up with the Lakers.

Here’s a Deadspin article. And a RealGM article. And Yahoo itself and not from Haynes.

Haynes didn’t even cite “sources.” He literally just said his opinion and it’s all over Twitter now.

Look, this is exactly the kind of weirdo move the Lakers would make. Still, calm the F down, everyone.


1175
TalkBack / Re: Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night (PS4) Impressions
« on: June 25, 2019, 05:32:24 PM »
I got through the first section. While I wouldn’t go as far as to call it “hot garbage,” the input lag in the Switch version is definitely noticeable and frustrating.

The visuals are worse than I expected but ultimately not a dealbreaker for me. The graphics are downgraded more than they probably need to be considering I don’t believe Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night is an especially hardware-taxing game even on PlayStation 4. I don’t know who was responsible for the Switch port, but if a more seasoned developer known for ports like Iron Galaxy or Bluepoint Games handled it, we probably would have seen better results at launch.

On the bright side, 505 Games reached out to Kickstarter backers today to say it has heard the complaints regarding Switch performance and have shifted resources to address them. Still, the game probably shouldn't have shipped in the shape it was in on any platform. There were multiple game breaking bugs. And I get it, bugs are hard to find and they have to be reproduced a few times before they can be addressed. It makes me wonder how many bugs testers found before the game went gold.

I don’t even know what the rush was. The game was officially delayed at least twice, maybe even three or four times. I can’t speak for all backers, but I would have been fine waiting a few more months. My Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night card is largely useless now. It was already missing all the upcoming DLC, but it’s supposedly unplayable without the day-one patch. I’m putting it on the backburner until some of these small updates 505 Games announced roll out.

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 407