301
General Gaming / RE:IGN Game and Console of the Year
« on: January 14, 2007, 06:44:06 PM »
People seem to be thinking the PS3 is such a good game because of games being released in the later part's of 2007. My friend has a PS3 and the only game he has now is Genji (Yeah it really is that bad) But the graphics seem to wow him the only good thing I've heard him say about it is "Look on some of the enemies armor there's reflection" The game looks nice but why should I care?
RE and Twilight Princess showed that the gamecube could pump out some nice looking games. If the Wii can produce things 2 to 3x better then that I am actually excited. Graphics were never a selling point for me. Earthbound was a pretty bad looking game when it was released. But it was so damn cool.
PS3 could have been a very nice choice this generation if they took out the Blueray player. I think they really shot themselves in the foot with this. It increases overall cost and what it brings to the table allienates a lot of potential PS3 buyers.
And about potential I forgot because I haven't looked at an upcoming release for PS3 in a long time. But the main 2 are MGS and FF. Good games in their own right (I never got into MGS I was raised in an island in the east guess which one) But for people to spend $600 for it now is a little ridiculous. It seems that Sony seems to have taken a stand that best graphics > everything. You would think they would have looked at the PS2 and seen why that was a success.
I can't see how with all of the bad press Sony recieved over PS3 that it recieved "____" of the year unless it was Tool of the year. ok this kind of turned into a rant without my knowledge and falling in line with my other rants none of the facts are backed up and the spelling is atrocious. Sorry for reading but you read it you can't unread it
RE and Twilight Princess showed that the gamecube could pump out some nice looking games. If the Wii can produce things 2 to 3x better then that I am actually excited. Graphics were never a selling point for me. Earthbound was a pretty bad looking game when it was released. But it was so damn cool.
PS3 could have been a very nice choice this generation if they took out the Blueray player. I think they really shot themselves in the foot with this. It increases overall cost and what it brings to the table allienates a lot of potential PS3 buyers.
And about potential I forgot because I haven't looked at an upcoming release for PS3 in a long time. But the main 2 are MGS and FF. Good games in their own right (I never got into MGS I was raised in an island in the east guess which one) But for people to spend $600 for it now is a little ridiculous. It seems that Sony seems to have taken a stand that best graphics > everything. You would think they would have looked at the PS2 and seen why that was a success.
I can't see how with all of the bad press Sony recieved over PS3 that it recieved "____" of the year unless it was Tool of the year. ok this kind of turned into a rant without my knowledge and falling in line with my other rants none of the facts are backed up and the spelling is atrocious. Sorry for reading but you read it you can't unread it
