76
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Gamespot Zelda Review
« on: November 20, 2006, 03:49:06 AM »
It wasn't contradictory. It was my expressing that I disagreed with the review, which having my own opinion, I'm within my rights to do.
As for your opinion on what a review should do, you are welcome to it as well, but I definitely disagree. A review is what one person thinks about a thing. Yes, they use their position to either encourage or discourage your own consumption, but that doesn't mean that the point of the review is to do that, only that it is a byproduct.
I think were you're confused is that you're assuming that because reviews influence purchases, that influencing purchases is the reason for the review. It's not. The reason for the review is to sell advertising, and to encourage people to read the review (and see the advertising). In fact, if the review is at all controversial, so much the better (that's the Ebert Theorem).
As for your opinion on what a review should do, you are welcome to it as well, but I definitely disagree. A review is what one person thinks about a thing. Yes, they use their position to either encourage or discourage your own consumption, but that doesn't mean that the point of the review is to do that, only that it is a byproduct.
I think were you're confused is that you're assuming that because reviews influence purchases, that influencing purchases is the reason for the review. It's not. The reason for the review is to sell advertising, and to encourage people to read the review (and see the advertising). In fact, if the review is at all controversial, so much the better (that's the Ebert Theorem).
