I again have to defend Splatoon a little here.
A lot of reviews have focused on the lack of content but I would argue that the content is in line with other games and more and more content will get added starting today I believe.
If you buy this game and don’t plan to play the online then I could see the argument being made for sure
The game launched with five maps and literally one game mode. We're at six and two now. There are a fair number of weapons, but even in that sense they artificially inflate the number by having duplicate primary weapons with different skins and subs/specials (which they couldn't get away with if the game had custom loadouts). Any way you slice it, that's a lack of content and most definitely not in line with other games (at least not good ones).
And I wouldn't say a lot of reviews have focused on the lack of content. The majority of reviews have focused on how fun the game is, which is why it's generally getting 8/10s. They point out the lack of content, which is entirely fair, but ultimately conclude that the game is really good and really fun in spite of this (which I agree with). I've already put ~15 hours into the online multiplayer myself, so it's not as I'm not having a lot of fun, but that doesn't change the facts. These flaws don't hold the game back from being good, but that doesn't mean they're not there.
You make fair points and yes there is no denying that compared to other shooters it does lack content but then at the same time you dumped 15 hours in the game already. That’s more than most modern games.
I guess the lack of content in a sense doesn’t bother me because I’ve already poured in more time in the game than most other games.
Agreed. It doesn't bother me either and I wouldn't be surprised if I'm approaching 100+ hours in the online multiplayer by the time summer is over. I just think that if someone wants to bring that up as a criticism, it's a fair point. I wouldn't agree with them if they said it was a bad game solely because of that, but at the same time I can see it being an issue for someone who likes but doesn't love the core gameplay. You really have to buy into the game to get past the issue and luckily it seems like most people have.
Yeah and you know what I agree with you.
I think at times I get defensive because other companies cram as much as possible into some games and half of that works or isn’t even very good.
Assassins creed can last you 100 hours but the games have bugs, half-baked ideas and unpolished gameplay in some areas.
Nintendo’s way is more like hey you know what we are going to polish the hell out of the gameplay and focus on that and then add content to it. If we don’t have enough time to add tons of content well that’s ok because the core gameplay and game is polished to a shine.
None of that Halo or GTA where the games didn’t even work online for all their content it was a moot point. I hear Halo STILL doesn’t work right after 100000000 patches. How about Skyrim? A game that many would argue didn’t even run in a playable form on the PS3.
So I actually applaud Nintendo for doing what’s right should get applauded.
PS. Anyone want to add me in splatoon. Kobeskillz