Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Arbok

Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83 ... 123
2001
Quote

Originally posted by: Dirk Temporo
lol whut? Red Steel looks as good in motion as it did in the first "screenshots" if you ask me.


I was impressed when I say the screen shots, and that E3 demo video that was set up, but seeing the game in motion from Leipzig has left me much less hyped about that aspect. I wouldn't call it bad by any regards, but it does not look nearly as polished as everything else of it I had seen of it before.

2002
General Gaming / RE:Sony getting hit Hard lately
« on: September 10, 2006, 08:21:50 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=196158&cid=16074429

I think it's real.


The PS3 far better on paper and at pulling off senseless benchmarks than at doing actual gameplay, much like the PS2? For some reason I'm surprised, even though we have seen this all before from Sony. The source sure does sound like he knows what he's doing, and I'm inclined to believe him as considering what he's saying there is no way that the person would go on the record with those comments. Still, could be false all the same and there is no real way to check it one way or the other until the system is actually out.

2003
Quote

Originally posted by: mantidor
so are the Splinter Cell screenshots photoshopped or not? Im bad at recognizing this things. It looks a lot better than what Ive come to expect from games for the console.


It's Ubisoft, so much like the Red Steel ones you can pretty much be assured that they are.

2004
Nintendo Gaming / RE:Wii is so not hardcore. And you know it!
« on: September 08, 2006, 09:16:09 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Dirk Temporo
Something occurred to me. What's the source on the quotes in the OP? I searched Google and couldn't find anything.

" Here is everything he said, it is from IGN roundtable BTW You have to be an insider member to see this."

-VGrevolution

That would explain why you aren't finding it through Google, as it's membership only content.

2005
NWR Forums Discord / RE:Nintendo trolls everywhere
« on: September 08, 2006, 08:27:58 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Mario
http://www.askmen.com/love/love_tip_250/297_love_tip.html

LMAO, look right under "medication"


What the hell? Most random gouge at an unreleased product I have ever seen...

2006
NWR Forums Discord / RE:"So, when did Fran Mirabella get hot?"
« on: September 06, 2006, 08:48:30 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: ShyGuy
whyyyy is dere NO pix???

plz


Google to the rescue:



Making out with a PSP? Major turn off...

...or wait, did you mean Fran?
http://www.planetgamecube.com/media.cfm?artid=570&MedTID=1&medtndx=672
(Blast from the past)

2007
General Gaming / RE:Sony getting hit Hard lately
« on: August 26, 2006, 04:06:55 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Spak-Spang
I want Nintendo and Sega to actually work together and become partners.  Sega could focus on Niche games and older gaming and keep their name on their games, and Nintendo does what it does.  It would be perfect.


Sega is dead. I might have agreed with you before the Sammy merger, but presently I could care less about them. Their games have been selling horribly anyway, and they are hardly a "system seller calibur" company anymore.

A Nintendo-Namco or Nintendo-Capcom partnership would be a much more suitable mix, although not very plausible on either account.

2008
Nintendo Gaming / RE:Super Smash Bros. Brawl
« on: August 26, 2006, 03:59:01 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
You keep bring up how so and so said this or the official site states that and my reply is still the same: So what? What is told to the public isn't always the whole truth.


*sigh* So your whole point is that Sakurai isn't trust worthy, in your opinion. Whatever. Personally I will take him at his word over fan musings, but if you think otherwise, more power to you.

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
You mean to tell me that you actually believe Nintendo would never make a true sequel to Smash if Sakurai wasn't involved just because Sakurai said it on the official site. That's just plain gullibility. Smash Bros. is arguably Nintendo's most popular and successful multiplayer game and they whore their characters out like no other.


Right, because it's not like there have ever been different versions of other games with the same rosters that have went through Nintendo, like some of the Mario Karts for example. I guess it's out of the question that Iwata might respect Sakurai too...

I'm sure if they made another one, the graphics would have been overhauled, modes changed, and the single player restructed (not counting the mentioned wi-fi addition). But perhaps Iwata felt that leaving the characters untouched without Sakurai's imput was important, hell he came from HAL so it's not a strange concept to assume they might have a good relationship with one another.

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
This all sprang from you telling another forum member that having more than the 2-3 3rd party characters that Sakurai has stated is "not likely." Am I correct? All I'm saying is that it's just as likely that there very well could be more than 2-3 present. The feedback on Snake's appearance in Brawl has been overwhelming.


And Sakurai made that comment in hindsight of the reaction at E3. Maybe he was trying to cool down the volume of requests? Maybe he would rather the game still be mostly dedicated to Nintendo? Who is to say. I doubt he just threw out that figure without any thought behind it though, considering the reaction it would garnish.

2009
NWR Forums Discord / RE:the 'be the last in this thread to post' game
« on: August 25, 2006, 11:20:38 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: WindyMan
I bet someone is going to win by reaching the thread post limit before the thread is abandoned.

I bet.


I bet not, considering the DS Sales thread has over 2,300 posts in it and is still ticking away.

2010
Nintendo Gaming / RE:Super Smash Bros. Brawl
« on: August 25, 2006, 09:38:49 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
Sorry, I forgot to check my logbook of official Brawl info to see that the 40 characters thing never came from Sakurai. Whatever.


-_-' Again, I mentioned it in the very same post that prompted you to go off on this tirade. It's not like this was brought up on page 24 or something in this topic.

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
The point is that a developer can "go on record" about anything. More often than not, they're just answering questions in interviews and end up contradicting themselves, albeit not on purpose.


Point taken and, point being? Yes things change from what a developer will tell us, either due to a deadline or simply being caught off gaurd during an interview and wording a response wrong. The quotes in question come off of the official site, though, so we can assume that Sakurai had plenty of time to formulate his response. Things could always change during the process. But, because of that, we are supposed to ignore everything the developer is telling us? If so, what would be the point of previews at all, since it's all subject to change anyway?

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
And last time I checked, Iwata is the president of NCL. It's his job, among many other things, to know the status every 1st and 2nd party game in development or planned to go into development. I also find it hard to believe that Nintendo wouldn't make another Smash without Sakurai. They'd probably prefer not to, but this is the same Nintendo that allowed Capcom to develop a Zelda title and let them include a kangaroo with boxing gloves that Link rides in. At some point (maybe not anytime soon), Smash will be in someone elses hands.


At this stage I'm just going to say it: you have never read the documentation on the Smash Bros site, have you? If so, why are you even debating about its probability if you aren't even familiar with the information yourself and its sources? The exact point that you brought up there was addressed on the site, and Nintendo was going to make another Smash Bros game without him if they had to (this comes from Iwata):

"We'd work to make the game independently, but we might be told to simply focus on making the game Wi-Fi compatible, and may be instructed not to lay a hand on any of the 26 characters in the current game..."

2011
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Battalion Wars II
« on: August 25, 2006, 05:26:36 PM »
I'm not impressed by the graphics... what I am impressed by are the controls, which look really nice and the idea of selecting unit commands like a mouse with the Wii controller sounds great.

2012
Nintendo Gaming / RE:Super Smash Bros. Brawl
« on: August 25, 2006, 05:20:46 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
Producers/directors say a lot of things. If you look back on any number of Miyamoto interviews, a lot of what he said never actually came true. Was he flat out lying? Maybe, maybe not. I remember when using the freehand controller to swing Link's sword in Twilight Princess was deemed "too tiring." Things change, for better or worse.


Again, it's "not likely". Could Sakurai change his mind? Sure. However, I will take his word at this stage over fan musings.

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
40 characters? 2-3 3rd party additions? I wouldn't put too much stake in that just because Sakurai said so.


Thanks for listening to me... -_-'

I will say it again, that 40 number never came from Sakurai, it came from that fake news piece that "confirmed" that Baby Bowser was in the game. So, again, we don't have the faintest idea how many they might be considering in total.

Quote

Originally posted by: Adrock
Satoru Iwata said Brawl was a launch title. That obviously didn't happen. Most people expect it Q2 2007, but it could come out Q4 or even in 2008.


Last time I checked, Iwata wasn't Sakurai, and his vision, as Bill said, was a last case scenario in case Sakurai turned it down. If you don't trust Sakurai, that's fine, but I have no reason not to just because other developers do things differently (I'd say it's naive to assume they all have the same exact habits too).

2013
Nintendo Gaming / RE:Super Smash Bros. Brawl
« on: August 25, 2006, 08:46:05 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Spak-Spang
and I expect around 4 to 5 different 3rd party characters represented.


Sakurai already went on record saying there was only going to be 2-3 in the game (including Snake), so that's not likely.

Also, just to be clear, that "around 40" number came from the same false piece of news that stated that Baby Bowser was confirmed, so we really have no idea what number of characters might make it in.

2014
General Chat / RE:Help a girl with car trouble!
« on: August 25, 2006, 07:35:25 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: 18 Days
Legend, thank you. Still wondering about any alternative ways. I have acctually seen soemone start it with the boiling water trick but maybe their battery wasn't totally dead.


I assume no, but I will ask anyway:

Does your car insurance company offer roadside assistance? (Like AAA and some others)

2015
TalkBack / RE:Pink and Black DS Lites Get a Date in the US
« on: August 25, 2006, 07:32:11 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
"Peach pink"? Now I may not be versed in English metaphors but aren't both of those words used to refer to female genitalia?


Not commonly enough to cause any problems, especially "peach". You are pretty safe with the word "Pink" anyway, I mean it's a color...

2016
General Chat / RE:The SciFi channel hates good shows.
« on: August 24, 2006, 09:54:05 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: wandering
I don't know the history, but if it was scifi's fault that the show was cancelled after a couple of years on their network, I will be forced to hate them forever.


The show was cancelled by the Sci-Fi channel after they picked it up, but it got a solid ending at least in 1999, with a great final episode that had a grand closure yet still felt like a normal old fun time one comes to expect from the series (the movie was Diabolik). Sci-Fi actually kept the show on their channel as reruns for five more years, before finally pulling it in 2004. To their credit, that was a huge amount of time to keep the show on given that they could only rerun their three seasons of it... although it would have been even better had they allowed more new episodes to have been filmed.  

As a side note, I found this classic in respects to this:

"When the series finale aired, the Sci Fi Channel had an official IRC chat with Mike Nelson, Bill Corbett, and Kevin Murphy. When asked by fans if they should stop watching the Sci Fi Channel after MST3K's cancellation, Kevin Murphy responded "YES STOP WATCHING!! NOW!!!" before the moderators could respond."  

2017
NWR Forums Discord / RE: TEH RETURN OF TEH KING
« on: August 24, 2006, 04:18:22 PM »
And there was peace in our time...

2018
General Gaming / RE:Sony getting hit Hard lately
« on: August 24, 2006, 03:48:29 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Professional 666
wow, lots of sony-published junk.


That was my first reaction too. This is not good for Sony to see so few third party titles there, considering that's pretty much what they are going to live on.  As Pro. said, their first party stuff is typically junk (aside from a few things like the Gran Turismo series) and there is no way they are going to lead the PS3 to success if they are forced to be the primary developer for it, akin to what Nintendo was for the GCN (although Nintendo actually makes good games).

2019
General Chat / RE:Funhouse Refugee Thread
« on: August 24, 2006, 12:06:53 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: vudu
Lots.  He can edit posts, unlock old posts, unban old forum members, change avatars, change titles, change passwords, add/delete filtered words, etc.  The little fellow will sleep well tonight.


Yep, Fusetalk is different from other boards in that moderators pretty much are given the keys to do anything.  Much different from other formats like phpbb where only Admins can modify user profiles (including bans/unbans).

2020
General Chat / RE:Funhouse Refugee Thread
« on: August 24, 2006, 11:54:38 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: PartyBear
He apparently got tired of banning already, and he'll probably tire of locking threads soon enough.


I actually prefer the locking for the time being over ThePerm's spamfest that was going on in there before it happend, where he was bumbing up every topic he could... someone needs to tell him that others can't see his post count.

2021
General Chat / RE:The SciFi channel hates good shows.
« on: August 24, 2006, 11:50:24 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill Aurion
The Sci-Fi channel died when Mystery Science Theater went off the air...


Preech it!

They used to be great when they firsted started out with MST3K in the roster and when screening older sci-fi flicks was the norm... instead of when today when they started producing their own dreck like "Python 2".

How that station is even around anymore boggles my mind.

2022
General Chat / RE: Funhouse Refugee Thread
« on: August 24, 2006, 11:25:15 AM »
*wonders why Vudu still has the troll avatar if he feels this way*

Anyway the whole thing seems like an overboard April Fools joke, but does anyone actually think it's anything more than prank?

In spirit of the old funhouse, though, here is an intoxicated Britney Spears in all her clueless and scary glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbY2g60BsLI

"You ever seen Back to the Future? ...is that possible?"  

2023
NWR Forums Discord / RE:Rent my Avatar Space!
« on: August 23, 2006, 10:48:16 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: animecyberat
Better yet Ill make a trade. You put my avatar up for a week and Ill place your ad on my site for the same amount of time.


Deal?




"It's a trap!"

2024
NWR Forums Discord / RE: Wandering's free speech zone
« on: August 23, 2006, 09:35:27 PM »
You know, to complete the circle, you should probably buy out UncleBob's avatar space for propaganda use and to ensure we don't abuse it... I'm sure he wouldn't mind.

2025
NWR Forums Discord / RE: All Hail Wandering
« on: August 23, 2006, 08:10:12 PM »
Overlords? Dear god, that means he has found some means of multiplying himself...

Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83 ... 123