Just when I'd thought the "blame videogames for violence" debate had gone quiet, CBS decided to interview some people about the issue.. While they did interview some people who actually play games (Tim from Ctrl-Alt-Del and Scott from VGCats) they also talked to Jack Thompson.
According to
his website, he's a lawyer from Miami who specialises in videogame-related crimes. He's offering his services to victims of copycat crimes, as well as talking about peddling the bandwagon of "video games are at fault" and predicting Columbine and the Washington sniper attacks. But we all have opinions. Read about his
here and Tim's comments are
also upThis is from the interview:
Quote
Different mediums, as they've come along, have had their share of controversy. From pulp horror and graphic novels, to movies, music and television; is this part of a cycle?
Yes, it is the last cycle. These are murder simulators. Manhunt has been called the video game equivalent of a snuff film. I am working with an Oakland, CA prosecutor in a murder trial in which the older gang members used GTA 3 to train teens to do carjackings and murders. The Army uses these games to break down the inhibition to kill of new recruits.
Look at the Institute for Creative Technologies created by DOD to create these killing games. Tax dollars paid to the industry to create the games to suppress the inhibition to kill, and then the industry turns around and sells these games to kids. One instance is Pandemic Studio's Full Spectrum Warrior. If it works for soldiers, of course it works for teens. The video game industry has absolutely no rebuttal to that argument. NONE.
Personally, I really think this guy is off his nut. And there are others who
agree with me but I've loathed lawyers for as long as I can remember. What about you guys? Does he have a point, or is he just performing incredible leaps to jump to these conclusions?