3326
General Gaming / RE: PS3 Estimated at $400
« on: July 14, 2005, 06:25:56 AM »
Yeah, the only thing that's really early about this generation is Microsoft. I think it was expecting Sony to launch the PS3 at the end of this year, so it wanted to catch up. Then when it turned out Sony was content to wait an extra year to launch PS3, I guess MS thought it would take advantage of a possible head-start rather than waiting.
Of course, I agree that this generation could have gone on longer than previous ones, there really isn't as much room for technical improvement as there used to be. I wish all three companies would give us an extra year or two on the current gen.
If Sony does come out at $400, will people buy it? Of course some will, but it may wind up depending on features. Price didn't make a difference this generation, but that may have been because PS2 and Xbox were seen as offering free DVD players (okay, Xbox didn't offer the DVD playback for free, but it was pretty cheap). If Sony can convince people they need Blu-Ray, then it could get away with that pricing...assuming that pricing is correct in the first place. Again, see PSP...everyone was predicting $300-$400 for that sucker.
Of course, I agree that this generation could have gone on longer than previous ones, there really isn't as much room for technical improvement as there used to be. I wish all three companies would give us an extra year or two on the current gen.
If Sony does come out at $400, will people buy it? Of course some will, but it may wind up depending on features. Price didn't make a difference this generation, but that may have been because PS2 and Xbox were seen as offering free DVD players (okay, Xbox didn't offer the DVD playback for free, but it was pretty cheap). If Sony can convince people they need Blu-Ray, then it could get away with that pricing...assuming that pricing is correct in the first place. Again, see PSP...everyone was predicting $300-$400 for that sucker.
