Post by: Chode2234 on January 22, 2004, 10:49:50 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 22, 2004, 11:43:40 AM
And there's no discussion because the game could take place anywhere in the timeline...(I hope it takes place after the Oracle games)
Post by: Jale on January 23, 2004, 07:41:29 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 23, 2004, 08:28:24 AM
Post by: Gibdo Master on January 23, 2004, 08:29:09 AM
Honestly though I'm beginning to wonder if Miyamoto wasn't talking about Tetra's Trakers and/or Hyrule Adventure. I mean doesn't almost 3 years of development time seem a little excessive for a GBA game? Unless it's just supposed to be that freaking huge. Also we haven't heard a damn thing about it since then.
Post by: Jale on January 25, 2004, 08:50:42 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: Bill
The Oracle games were no side-story...It was a whole new Link...
By side-story I meant an adventure that doesn't take place in (or above as in WW) Hyrule.
Post by: Gibdo Master on January 25, 2004, 09:51:15 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 25, 2004, 11:28:40 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: Gibdo Master
Actually whether it is a new Link or not depends on where you put the game in the time line. For instance a lot of people believe it is a direct sequel to A Link to the Past and a prequel to Link's Awakening meaning that it's the same Link in all 3 of those games.
Considering that Link in the Oracle games had never met Zelda before, I thought it was pretty obvious that he wasn't the Link from LttP...The Oracle games could be Link's Awakening prequel, maybe, but it's definitely not related to LttP...
Post by: Chode2234 on January 25, 2004, 12:01:43 PM
But anyway, what would you guys like to see in another GBA game, any improvements from LttP, or anything you wouldn't want to see. I myself would love it to have Epona. Do you think Nintendo would put a beast of burden in a GBA game?
Post by: odifiend on January 25, 2004, 02:31:23 PM
Post by: Gibdo Master on January 25, 2004, 02:50:39 PM
Overall I'm not the biggest fan of the Capcom Zeldas so I would prefer that they attempt to make A Link to the Past 2. I mean that game play wise not story wise by the way.
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 25, 2004, 03:22:21 PM
Post by: Gibdo Master on January 25, 2004, 06:23:14 PM
Post by: Jale on January 26, 2004, 08:01:59 AM
Post by: Chode2234 on January 27, 2004, 10:15:34 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 27, 2004, 10:47:45 AM
If you only play 4 Swords + by yourself, then you are missing out on a good percentage of the game, but I don't doubt that Hyrule Adventure will be large enough to warrant purchase(for only 1 player play)...
Post by: mouse_clicker on January 27, 2004, 10:51:21 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 27, 2004, 11:17:34 AM
Oracles - Meeting Zelda for the first time
LA - Memories of Zelda(meaning he had met her before)
LA can only be related to one of the two, not to both...
Post by: mouse_clicker on January 27, 2004, 11:35:36 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 27, 2004, 11:51:02 AM
I, myself, am leaning more towards it being after the Oracle games, because the end of the linked game shows Link riding off on a boat...
Post by: mouse_clicker on January 27, 2004, 11:52:40 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 27, 2004, 12:13:30 PM
Before being changed, OoT was originally going to end with Link and Malon riding off into the sunset on Epona...
But as I said, it's all up for debate...I just wish Ninty would just spill what the timeline was... ;___;
Post by: mouse_clicker on January 27, 2004, 12:14:42 PM
Post by: Guitar Smasher on January 27, 2004, 03:39:15 PM
Post by: Jale on January 28, 2004, 08:34:46 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 28, 2004, 11:17:13 AM
