Post by: FOX McLOUD on January 08, 2004, 05:36:14 AM
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 08, 2004, 06:12:07 AM
Post by: Uglydot on January 08, 2004, 09:15:35 AM
Post by: VoodooMerlin on January 08, 2004, 09:42:43 AM
Post by: Ian Sane on January 08, 2004, 10:02:11 AM
Post by: SearanoX on January 08, 2004, 10:17:29 AM
Oh, and is that you from ZU/TAU, Fox? If it is, then what's up?
Post by: kennyb27 on January 08, 2004, 11:40:29 AM
Post by: Bloodworth on January 08, 2004, 04:23:09 PM
Post by: ThePerm on January 08, 2004, 05:54:48 PM
Post by: FOX McLOUD on January 09, 2004, 05:25:22 AM
Post by: Bloodworth on January 09, 2004, 05:28:47 AM
Post by: Bloodworth on January 09, 2004, 05:33:05 AM
Post by: FOX McLOUD on January 09, 2004, 05:33:27 AM
Post by: Bloodworth on January 09, 2004, 05:39:25 AM
Post by: Ian Sane on January 09, 2004, 06:20:47 AM
Zelda looks like a cartoon and Final Fantasy CC doesn't. That's what I figure anyway. Lately I find it's been much harder to get an 'E' rating. Super Smash Bros Melee shouldn't be 'T' and neither should Midway Arcade Treasures or Star Fox Adventures. It doesn't really matter though since 'T' is the best rating to get in terms of marketing. It's a "cool" rating like 'M' but makes the game easier for kids to purchase.
Post by: Bill Aurion on January 09, 2004, 06:32:31 AM
Post by: Ian Sane on January 09, 2004, 06:40:01 AM
Post by: Rob91883 on January 09, 2004, 10:28:09 AM
Quote
Nintendo is publishing this. Nothing's changed. It's all too obvious now with the bombardment of both mail and e-mail regarding the game I've gotten this week.
Plus, FF CC isn't even listed under games in the Square Enix U.S.A website.
. Square-Enix doesn't need to invest a lot of money when they just list the game on their website( the max they could do), If I didn't know any better it's like Square wants the game to fail.
Post by: Ian Sane on January 09, 2004, 11:04:03 AM
Maybe they just don't include games that haven't been released yet. I doubt they want the game to fail but they probably don't care about it as much as the GBA games. This title was designed pretty much in exchange for a GBA license. Gamecube development is likely not anything they're going to show much more interest in anyway regardless of sales. They're now pretty much run by Enix who is a real tight ass about being exclusive to the market leader.
Post by: Rob91883 on January 09, 2004, 11:35:21 AM
Quote
Maybe they just don't include games that haven't been released yet. I doubt they want the game to fail but they probably don't care about it as much as the GBA games. This title was designed pretty much in exchange for a GBA license. Gamecube development is likely not anything they're going to show much more interest in anyway regardless of sales. They're now pretty much run by Enix who is a real tight ass about being exclusive to the market leader.
Hence " If I didn't know any better," I know Square doesn't want the game to fail, and I agree with you, they felt forced to make the game. Square- Enix wasn't even involved with Sword of Mana, and it was developed bye Brownie Brown and Published by Nintendo. This is part of a bigger problem we have all talked about before, but I dont want to get off topic. I think Square was a tight ass before Enix
P.S. I like this game, and I'm going to buy it. I'm just not blind to what's happening!
Post by: KDR_11k on January 10, 2004, 12:05:07 AM
Post by: VoodooMerlin on January 10, 2004, 12:23:09 AM
Play it or don't.
Nintendo's a powerhouse publisher, developer...whatever. And so are Square and Enix. Who cares who publishes it? Get it made, get it shipped and put it on the shelves so that I can get it into my Cube.
Simple as that.
Post by: Locke Cole on January 13, 2004, 03:16:26 PM
Post by: VoodooMerlin on January 13, 2004, 10:46:28 PM
