Nintendo World Report Forums

Community Forums => General Chat => Topic started by: Termin8Anakin on November 05, 2003, 05:46:45 AM

Title: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 05, 2003, 05:46:45 AM
I finished watching Matrix Revolutions just half and hour ago, and all I have to say is 'I am so f**king dizzy'.
Action was eye-ballingly fast, and the fight scenes are litterally not for the fait of heart, nor the epileptic.

I think the movie posed a few more questions imo, then it did answer, especially if you were confused in MAtrix Reloaded.
But it does have that 'resolution', that 'definite end' that the directors/producers/actors said that we would get.

I won't go into any details until other people get into this, but the movie is worth seeing, but please, prepare to turn your eyes into mush.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: akdaman1 on November 05, 2003, 08:31:05 AM
I still havent seen the first one...i meant the second one..i saw the first one but did not see the second one...I will not be able to see this due to Mario Karts arrival in a week.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Hostile Creation on November 05, 2003, 09:15:00 AM
I think I'm going to go see it next Wednesday, since there's an early day at school, but I'm not sure.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Nintendo Gamecube on November 05, 2003, 11:23:15 AM
I have tickets to go see it in 2 hours. I've been waiting for this since the first day of reloaded....
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: ThePerm on November 05, 2003, 01:45:55 PM
gotta watch it!!!!!!
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Moonwatcher on November 05, 2003, 05:38:42 PM
Saw it at 8 Am today in a packed theatre and it was great.  I'm glad that this was such an improvement over Reloaded.  Reloaded was good, but just didn't feel right.  You know?  Probably not.  In  any case, Revolutions could have been better, but I'm happy.  Not even close to the original but a satisfactory ending.  
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 05, 2003, 05:53:47 PM
OK, now that I am fully concious (I don't remember starting this tread at all ;____; I come here and it's OH! I made a thread!), I have to say that MAtrix Revolutions was a kick ass movie.
Why, do you ask, did I say that I wasn't fully concious?
Well, consider this:
I booked tickets to the MAtrix MArathon. The Matrix at 7pm, The MAtrix Reloaded at 10pm, and then The Matrix Revolutions, the simultaneous worldwide release, at 1am.
After it finished at 3:30am, I went home, and didn't sleep till like 7am. Was just talking to my friends until that time.
And I woke up like a couple of hours ago (it's nearly 4pm now).

ANYWAY....

What did you guys think of it?
Assuming I am not the only one here who has watched it.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 05, 2003, 06:33:13 PM
Ok, I just got back from seeing The Matrix: Revolutions about an hour ago, and am prepared to write my review more or less.  I just took a few sleeping pills, so I don't know how long I will last, but I'll give it a shot.  As always, my reviews are spoiler free, so don't worry if you haven't seen it.

First of all, I would like to say that I went into the movie with very low expectations.  I liked The Matrix fine and dandy, although I didn't see it as the second coming of Star Wars, the way that many did.  The second movie was a dissapointment to me.  I liked the atmosphere and style with which the first movie was done, and the second one sort of went off on its own, and left the first one behind.  It almost felt like the first movie should have been one of the films on The Animatrix, and I just found that wrong.  The movie also seemed to be very strained, and like it was trying to be something that it wasn't.  As a result, I had felt that the trilogy had completely lost its magic, and had become nothing more than a symbol of modern day pop culture.  Thus, I entered the movie theater with low expectations, and expected to see more of the same stuff that was given to us in The Matrix Reloaded.  It's just as well that I expected that I suppose.  In a sense it WAS a continuation of The Matrix Reloaded, but it regained the atmosphere and feel of the first movie, and that was really the most important thing.

The Matrix has always had a very disjointed feel to it.  Much of the dialog and events have always seemed a little forced, as if the creators had specific scenes that they wanted to show, and were willing to warp the natural order of things in order to present those scenes, and those lines.  I have always considered The Matrix to be a very quirky story, as many plot elements just don't make sense, but the stylistic value makes up for the lack of plausability.  The third movie is not any different.  There was one scene that was supposed to summon deep emotion, and I actually started giggling at the horrible dialog and acting.  But enough about that.

The movie contains a much more epic feel than either of the first two movies.  Maybe that's what I really liked about it.  But the whole time I was watching the movie, I felt a familiar aura.  It seemed almost as if Star Wars, Xenogears, Silent Hill, and Chrono Trigger had all come to pay their respects.  Those who know me well would know that this ranks quite high among my highest praise.  One part during the movie, I could have almost sworn I heard the dialog spoken during the credits of Silent Hill 2.  Another part struck a very familiar nerve with me, bringing images of the beginning of the second disc of Xenogears.  Pure artwork.  It could be that I am tired and losing touch with reality, but I honestly felt like I was watching and listening to those scenes again for the first time.

The Matrix Revolutions has it all, and it doesn't even really feel that rushed.  It's got the same mythological environment and atmosphere present in the first movie, it's got epic battle sequences that would feel at home during the climax of Star Wars Episode II, and the story between Trinity and Neo for once didn't feel pushed and out of place.  It felt like it would belong in Xenogears.  

I guess that my closing remarks on this movie would be that the sum of the parts was truly greater than the whole.  The ending wasn't that great, and the story wasn't entirely unexpected.  But the imagery and craftsmanship involved in the movie more than made up for any other shortcomings that the movie may have had.  If you were looking for the sequel to The Matrix in The Matrix Reloaded, and were dissapointed, then now is the time that you are repaid for the money you spent to go and see it.  This is the sequel.

Formal scoring?  I don't do that for movies.  Just games.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 05, 2003, 06:35:27 PM
Just as a side note apart from my main review, I will say that I hated the ending because it felt unclosed.  Unsettled.  Sure it was an ending, but I just thought that it should have been more grand, and less simple.  Something unexpected.  It felt "right" though, so I will leave my comment like that.  I just wish it had been more final.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: DrForester on November 05, 2003, 06:56:57 PM
I liked the ending a lot.  It left a lot of things open to interpetation, and given they say matrix is partly inspired by anime, i wasn't to surprised.


SPOILER BELOW:




I liked that they left the question at the end about if Neo lived or died.  Thought it was a very good question to leave open.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 05, 2003, 07:06:25 PM
Which is exactly what I didn't like about it.  I wanted an ending, not an opening for a sequel.  And I really didn't care for the mega happy ending that we got.  It was supposed to be a Shakespearean tragedy type deal from what I could see, but the ending just felt a little muddled.  Which is it?  Mega happy or tragedy?
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: GoldShadow1 on November 05, 2003, 08:37:26 PM
I wanna see it.  And if I somehow cross a spoiler before then, someone shall pay.  (thanks to all of the above who gave spoiler warnings)
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 05, 2003, 11:18:27 PM
This is ONLY for people who have seen the movie. If you read, and there are posts after this saying 'NOOOOOOOOO!' or any of your next posts directed toward me are filled with anger or rage, then you are a dick.

I was confused by that whole darn ending. I mean, is that city a new one, rebuilt from the machine city, from the real world or is it the 'new' Matrix? And that HUGE spike head machine - is that the Architect? I think I get it, in that the Oracle, Achitect, Sereph and that little girl were not part of the real world or the Martix, so that is why they survived. When Smith takes over the Oracle, did that mean that she was the one that killed him in the end? Or when Smith took over Neo then NEO was the one wo defeated Smith in the same manner he did in the first movie?

I think the best part of the movie was when Trinity drives up through the clouds, and they see the real, sunlit sky for the first time. It just gave me goosebumps from that good feeling.

Did Neo really die? I mean, the deal with the 'Architect' was to destroy their common enemy - Smith - who could now take over beings from the real world as well (Bane). If he failed to defeat Smith, then the machines could kill him. So did he really die? All we see is this huge flash of light in Neo's 'fire-vision'.


You know, I was quite glad that some of our predictions that there would be another Matrix turned out to be wrong.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Swordsplay on November 06, 2003, 04:27:44 AM
It was the sweetest movie ive ever seen!  Well worth it!
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 04:36:31 AM
NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!  You spoiled the movie for me, you jerk!

Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Swordsplay on November 06, 2003, 04:38:41 AM
---Quote by Bill---

"NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! You spoiled the movie for me, you jerk!

  "

---End quote----


???????  Who?  Me?  How?  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 06:02:58 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin
This is ONLY for people who have seen the movie. If you read, and there are posts after this saying 'NOOOOOOOOO!' or any of your next posts directed toward me are filled with anger or rage, then you are a dick.

Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Hostile Creation on November 06, 2003, 10:16:39 AM
I have yet to see this, but I feel like commenting on the first two.  Dunno why.

The first movie was great in the sense that Grey Ninja said it was. . . the sense of style, that sort of thing.  It was also fun to watch, and had pretty good dialogue.  The second movie was slightly less satisfying in that aspect. . . there were some additions I liked, like that Keymaker guy and the aspects of the plot that they added, but scenes like the kissing situation, the whole underground rave, and Neo and Trinity's relationship often seemed unnecessary and pressured.  Also, I think part of the reason that it seemed less stylish is because a great deal of it took place in Zion. . . this made the setting somewhat less fantastic. . . the second movie was basically trying to tie the first and third together, I imagine.
The fight scenes in the second movie were incredible, though.  I laughed aloud several times in surprise and appreciation during some of the scenes. . . the first was good this way, but the second was much cooler (though also much less realistic, but who cares?).  If the third can pull those two positive parts of the two movies and get the better of both its predecessors, it could be very good.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 06, 2003, 10:46:42 AM
I have a fairly simple understanding of this trilogy, but I have a question. I hope it doesn't seem too stupid. What is it that happened differently this 7th time around that had not happened the other 6 times to finally end the war?

Thanks
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 10:54:41 AM
::SPOILERS!!!::

First off, thesos, you might want to put some spoiler tags up, or at least identify your post as containing spoilers.





Secondly, Neo is the 6th, not the 7th- there were 5 before him, not 6. Anyway, without having seen Revolutions yet, I'll try to describe why as best I can- the first 5 anomalies all chose not to destroy the mainframe and to instead let Zion be destroyed and rebuilt. Neo chose instead to save Zion- if he succeeds, Zion will be saved and the machines finally defeated. If he fails, not only is Zion destroyed, but so is the resistance to the machines.  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 06, 2003, 11:08:48 AM
Sorry about the spoilers thing. So whats makes the current Neo choose differently than the other? Trinity?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 11:14:39 AM
Exactly.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 11:20:34 AM
Wow, I'm surprised that you got so deep into the Matrix movies...The theological views are pretty blatent...
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 11:21:53 AM
Are you talking to me, or someone else? I'm confused.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 11:23:30 AM
Confused about what?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 11:27:22 AM
Who you're talking to.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 11:29:17 AM
You, of course!

I just found it funny that you have actually spent the time looking into such a theological film, Mr. "I don't care for religion."
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 11:38:58 AM
I enjoy reading about the history of religion, though- I like reading the stories in the Bible, but I generally ignore whatever spiritual and religious morals it's trying to impress on me. Hence, I really enjoy the story of the Matrix, and am interested by it's religious references, just as long as it's not preaching. I generally just ignore the double meaning of all the religious things anyway, though.  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 11:42:51 AM
Actually, I don't think The Matrix was concentrating specifically on one religion, but rather on religion as a whole.  The belief of a higher being in general, if you will...And it's that which caught my eye in the first place...
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 01:18:45 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILERS!!!


any reference to religion in the matrix shouldnt be taken too seriously imo. it does draw parallells....like neo coming back from the dead to save humanity. its like christianity meets secular humanism. if you are religious, you may consider it sacreligious. i know a few people who do. just dont think too deeply about it, because there is not that much there....but anyways the 2nd movie was a huge let down, which will probably lead to me loving the 3rd because i basically have no expectations for the final movie.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 02:40:33 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin

I was confused by that whole darn ending. I mean, is that city a new one, rebuilt from the machine city, from the real world or is it the 'new' Matrix? And that HUGE spike head machine - is that the Architect? I think I get it, in that the Oracle, Achitect, Sereph and that little girl were not part of the real world or the Martix, so that is why they survived. When Smith takes over the Oracle, did that mean that she was the one that killed him in the end? Or when Smith took over Neo then NEO was the one wo defeated Smith in the same manner he did in the first movie?


The city at the end was The Matrix.  Restored to it's former glory.  It was basically to show that the people who Agent Smith had taken over survived, and were themselves again.  The reason that Neo and Smith were both KILLED at the end of the movie is because it is exactly as the Oracle said.  Smith was the negative Neo, Neo's polar opposite.  When they existed in the same space, they cancelled eachother out.  Much like a matter/anti-matter reaction.

Quote

Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin

I think the best part of the movie was when Trinity drives up through the clouds, and they see the real, sunlit sky for the first time. It just gave me goosebumps from that good feeling.


Agreed.  That part totally rocked.  I remember clearly thinking something when that happened, but I don't remember what it was now.  But that part was magnificent.

Quote

Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin

Did Neo really die? I mean, the deal with the 'Architect' was to destroy their common enemy - Smith - who could now take over beings from the real world as well (Bane). If he failed to defeat Smith, then the machines could kill him. So did he really die? All we see is this huge flash of light in Neo's 'fire-vision'.


Yes, Neo died.  It was the only thing that made sense to happen.  If ever in some sequel they bring him back to life, I will be VERY upset for reasons I already mentioned.


Regarding religion in The Matrix...  It was done in a Japanese style, treating religion as a mythos rather than an ethos.  As a result, it becomes a STORY rather than a BELIEF.  Therein lies the difference.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 06, 2003, 02:46:06 PM
The whole aspect of Neo himself is a reference to Christ.
In the first movie, Morpheus says to Neo that the Matrix was created with a man born inside, who could do and change anything. When he died, Oracle prophsized his return. So Neo is basically the 'Second Coming'.

The difference with Neo and the previous 'Ones' is that while they all had the basic human capability of choice (the two doors in the Architect's place), Neo would have been the first 'One' to choose going back to the MAtrix to try and save it instead of going back to the Source. His decision was based on his love for Trinity. The other 'Ones' knew what they had to do, and did it, and i reckon, with no questions asked.

Probably the underlaying message is that being human automatically gives you choice. You know what you have to do - you know what your purpose is - and every choice you make in life will ultimately lead to the completion of that purpose.
For example, if you want to be a 3D Animator when you grow up, every choice you make, the subjects you do at school/Uni/College will help you to achieve that goal.
Some things, however, do not go to plan and you try something else in order to achieve your goal.
Neo's basic understanding of his purpose was that he would end the war. HE went to the Architect, and found out that in order to end the war, he would have to end Zion, and create it again (be apart of the new MAtrix). BEcause that was not what he thought it would be, he went back into the Matrix to try again.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 06, 2003, 02:51:12 PM
Ahhhh, thanks Ninja, I get that Smith-Neo bit now.
One other thing I wanna ask is that
the Architect and Oracle discuss freeing the others from the MAtrix. The Architect says that he keeps his promises - does that mean everyone will be freed, and the machines will have to find another energy source?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 02:59:12 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin
Ahhhh, thanks Ninja, I get that Smith-Neo bit now.
One other thing I wanna ask is that
the Architect and Oracle discuss freeing the others from the MAtrix. The Architect says that he keeps his promises - does that mean everyone will be freed, and the machines will have to find another energy source?


My interpretation of that is a line from the second movie.  "There are levels of survival that we are prepared to accept."  The machines kept their word, and spared Zion.  The Architect will keep his word and free any people who do not wish to remain in the Matrix.  Of course, there will always be people who wish to remain there, so it's not like the machines will be completely depleted of power.  (Besides, I always wondered why they didn't use nuclear reactors.  It would be ever so much more efficient than using people, but I guess that wouldn't make for a good story.)
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 04:07:11 PM
SPOILERS!!

Quote

Actually, I don't think The Matrix was concentrating specifically on one religion, but rather on religion as a whole. The belief of a higher being in general, if you will...And it's that which caught my eye in the first place...


If anything I'd see it as a message AGAINST organized religion (although I know that's not true)- the whole idea of a small group of beings keeping you under control for their own survival. Like I said, I know that's not what the Wachowski's meant, but you could interpret it as such.


Grey: Nuclear reactors are very unstable and can have very horrorific accidents that result in radioactive contamination. Besides, a source of power that simultaneously energizes the robots AND enslaves the human is a good one- remember, the robots wanted complete freedom from humans, not just an alternate power source. That, and it would've been a boring story otherwise.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: ThePerm on November 06, 2003, 04:11:04 PM
1 + (-1) = 0  

ok heres what i gathered happened. Did you wonder if neo died. Well he did. All things must come to an end....eventually. When smith copies himself he moves the controlling copy onto the next host. Inside smith was
the oracle and the little girl and serif...also neo would exist in soem realm of his mind. Neo was plugged into the machine
and was under the watch of the Face...not necassarilly the architect...the matrix as a whole. When smith got downloaded to neos brain harddrive that put smith in the real world and at a disadvantage. The matrix seperates all the personalities inside neo and deletes the master smith program. It is unclear whether neo dies or not......however it is unimportant.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Hostile Creation on November 06, 2003, 04:13:12 PM
NO!  You did it wrong!  The movie is ruined for me now!!!!
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 06, 2003, 04:20:08 PM
SPOILERS!!!

So the Matrix still exists after the war. I thought one of the main things they were fighting for in all the movies was to free the minds of everyone from the Matrix. Wasn't a main point that humans are all slaves to the machines? I know the machines came together with the humans with the common purpose of defeating Smith, but the machines still hold humans as slaves. Could someone explain how this all ends up good for everyone?

Thanks
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 04:36:59 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: thesos21
SPOILERS!!!

So the Matrix still exists after the war. I thought one of the main things they were fighting for in all the movies was to free the minds of everyone from the Matrix. Wasn't a main point that humans are all slaves to the machines? I know the machines came together with the humans with the common purpose of defeating Smith, but the machines still hold humans as slaves. Could someone explain how this all ends up good for everyone?

Thanks


You can use spoiler tags by using the "[" square brackets, and typing spoiler within them, and closing them as appropriate.

The humans who wish to leave the matrix are free to do so.  To those who don't wish to live in the real world, they are also free to do so.  The humans win in the sense that they have the freedom to do as they wish.

Quote

Grey: Nuclear reactors are very unstable and can have very horrorific accidents that result in radioactive contamination. Besides, a source of power that simultaneously energizes the robots AND enslaves the human is a good one- remember, the robots wanted complete freedom from humans, not just an alternate power source. That, and it would've been a boring story otherwise.  


Yes, you hit it right on the nail with that last one.  But machines are not sadistic overlorlds.  Any intelligent AI will take in the variables, and analyze the best course of action by judging the cost to benefit ratio.  Nuclear power is cheap, and the effects of a catastrophic disaster would have little effect on a world already ravaged by nuclear war.  Radioactive contamination does NOTHING to a computer.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 04:40:16 PM
Huh, I figured the radioactivity would have done something, at least to the delicate circuitry. And while it's true that machines aren't sadistic overlords, they don't want the humans to retain their former status of dominance over them.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 06, 2003, 04:45:47 PM
SPOILERS!!!

So I assume the real world is still dark and cloudy. Why would anyone want to live there? Will the machines and humans somehow make the real world better again?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 04:52:38 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: mouse_clicker
Huh, I figured the radioactivity would have done something, at least to the delicate circuitry. And while it's true that machines aren't sadistic overlords, they don't want the humans to retain their former status of dominance over them.


A dead human is a harmless human.

Quote


So I assume the real world is still dark and cloudy. Why would anyone want to live there? Will the machines and humans somehow make the real world better again?



Realistically speaking, I would think that the surface of the earth would be much like Venus by that point.  Raining pure hydrosulphuric acid, and temperatures that would melt steel in a couple of seconds.

But speaking in terms of the movie, I say, yeah sure why not?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 04:57:20 PM
But you just said even machines are sadistic overlords.

Also, I'd imagine Earth being more like a nuclear winter- from the look of the sky, I don't think it would act as a greenhouse, but rather as a shield, blocking out heat altogether. I could be wrong, though.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 05:00:37 PM
No, I said machines are NOT sadistic overlords.

I suppose you are right about the sky though.  I have had a lot to drink, so bear with me.  I guess that the earth would be more like Titan.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 06, 2003, 05:02:24 PM
SPOILERS!!!

So would humans go back to living there? If not, where do all the free humans live. It seems the Matrix would be the better place even if you're not free.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 05:04:10 PM
USE FREAKING SPOILER TAGS!!!!

But some people seem to like realism or some crap like that.  Personally, I would pick the Matrix any day of the week, but whatever.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 05:06:19 PM
Correct, MC...Just think back to what happened to the dinosaurs...They died out because it grew cold(the sun was blocked by debris shifted after the meteorite hit)...So if anything, it should be cold, not hot
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 05:14:54 PM
Gah, sorry ninja- I have problems with contractions. I meant ythat you said they weren't sadistic overlords. Sorry.

Titan? As in with gas lakes? I suppose Titan would be the best comparison, though.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 05:21:06 PM
fair enough.  The logical course of action in that case is to wipe out the human race, and use nuclear fission to generate power.  The first movie said that fusion power was used with the human energy, but I really fail to see how that works at all, so I am sticking with the fusion idea.  I was an engineering student, so it's not like I am totally stupid about such things.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 05:21:47 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: mouse_clicker
SPOILERS!!

If anything I'd see it as a message AGAINST organized religion (although I know that's not true)- the whole idea of a small group of beings keeping you under control for their own survival. Like I said, I know that's not what the Wachowski's meant, but you could interpret it as such.


well i dont mean to burst your bubble but i think the people that belong to a religion are in the majority. any effort against religion is a group of small people going against the majority. there are over 4.6 billion christians, islamic, jews, hindu, and buddist alone....out of 6 billion, and thats not including a lot of the smaller religions.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 05:37:22 PM
nolimit, I don't think Mouse Clicker phrased it properly, but his point was correct.  Religion says that there is one guy who controls all the world (God).  He has the power to do whatever he wishes to the world, but people maintain their free will.  The Matrix presents that as it SHOULD be seen, with God being a race of intelligent machines, and they have the power to do whatever they wish through clever coding.  The thing I think Mouse was trying to say was that religion was treated as Mythos rather than Ethos, as it is commonly accepted.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 05:39:41 PM
oohhhhhh...now that makes more sense.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 05:43:46 PM
Uh, right, that's what I meant.

Seriously, though, Ninja explained it pretty well, although the main point I was trying to make was about organized religion itself rather than God, although that's very fitting as well. Organized religion is ruled by a select few who tell all its followers how to live, what to do, how to dress, etc, etc. It's really more an allusion to Catholocism than anything else.

Also, Ninja, doesn't nuclear fusion generate infinitely more power than nuclear fission? We've already employed nuclear fission as a means of power, but not nuclear fusion yet. The sun works by nuclear fusion, and its power will last many billions of years.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 05:53:13 PM
I don't see how the machines could be analogous to God...It wouldn't make much sense for Jesus(Neo) to fight God(Machines) now would it?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: ThePerm on November 06, 2003, 05:55:06 PM
ooooh
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 05:57:04 PM
yea the machines are satan if anything(at least if you are looking at it from a christian stand point)...they represent his will to create havoc and chaos.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 05:58:08 PM
There's already a Satan, though- the French guy from Reloaded (can't remember his name). If anything, I think the humans are more god and the machines are their creations, who revolt, and Neo (ala Christ) must come to make them see the error of their ways. That's just another way of looking at it.  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 06:03:03 PM
hmmmm....well maybe the system as a whole just represents evil....similar in christianity where they dont just believe in satan, but demonic angels as well. so its a collective group. satan is just their leaders.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 06:03:59 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill
I don't see how the machines could be analogous to God...It wouldn't make much sense for Jesus(Neo) to fight God(Machines) now would it?


Come on.  It's not a precise depiction of Christianity.

Mouse Clicker, Fusion power produces a lot more power than fission (but not infinitely), but from the explanation given in the first movie, I don't see how that's possible.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 06:06:32 PM
That's the way I was leaning towards...And something about the end of Revolutions...

I think Neo died, just as the Christ died for everyones' sins...If you look at it from a religious point-of-view the ending isn't so open afterall
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 06:08:32 PM
Bill, I don't think that's what the film makers were going for.  At least I HOPE not.

EDIT:  Mouse Clicker, I really want you to listen to "The Miracle" on the Xenosaga OST, and tell me what you think.  And if you have played Xenogears or Xenosaga, PLEASE PM me your impressions of the game.  I would really like to know.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 06:11:48 PM
Again, I think they left that for interpretation so that both religious and non-religious viewers could shape the ending in the way they wanted it...Since I'm a religious person, I took the ending from the religious point-of-view.  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: nolimit19 on November 06, 2003, 06:14:13 PM
well its obvious that the relgious parralels are there, so i wouldnt be suprised if that was their motive.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 06:15:29 PM
No Bill.  We both agree that Neo died.  Our reasoning is just different.  You seem to think that the humans were dirty sinners, and needed redemption, and needed "saving".  Myself and Mouse seem to think that Neo died as a result of a scientific reason.  Whatever the reason, Neo is still dead.  Can we please leave it at that instead of having the standard religious debate following that?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 06:17:34 PM
Good point- from what I can glean from The Second Renaissance, I don't think humans were advanced enough to have figured out nuclear fusion by then. Then again, one might think the machines could have.

Also, why are you asking me about Xenogears/Xenosaga- I don't own either, although I'd like to change that as soon as I get a little money. Is it because of its religious message? Speaking of RPG's with religious messages, Grandia II had a great one- just had to get that off my chest.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 06, 2003, 06:17:53 PM
I wasn't arguing that whether Neo died was open to interpretation or not...I was stating that HOW and WHY Neo died was open to interpretation...Again I'll say, movie watchers with high religious values will take Neo's death symbolically while those who don't will not...
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 06:26:21 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: mouse_clicker
Also, why are you asking me about Xenogears/Xenosaga- I don't own either, although I'd like to change that as soon as I get a little money. Is it because of its religious message? Speaking of RPG's with religious messages, Grandia II had a great one- just had to get that off my chest.


Xenogears had a VERY distinct religious interpretation.  "The Miracle" on the Xenosaga OST is one of the finest pieces of music I know of, and obviously I am listening to it right now.  I am seriously going to miss Yasunori Mitsuda in the next episode of Xenosaga, as his music is REALLY good, but I suppose it can't be helped.

But I would really recommend playing Xenogears ASAP.  (I am almost done Xenosaga Episode I, and Xenogears is undeniably the better game.  If you REALLY want to play it, PM me with your MSN name.)
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: mouse_clicker on November 06, 2003, 06:41:49 PM
No MSN for me, sorry- all my friends use AIM, and I'm too lazy to get Trillian or anything. I'll definitely check those two games out, though- there's a discount game shop in town I think will have either if not both for very cheap.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Grey Ninja on November 06, 2003, 06:49:46 PM
Canadians seem to use MSN and Americans seem to use AIM.  That just strikes me as wrong on both counts.

Nevertheless, I am on AIM right now (via Trillian, as I hate AIM more than MSN surprisingly enough).  ANSWER ME!
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Swordsplay on November 06, 2003, 07:23:59 PM

***WARNING!***Will contain a spoler to the Revolutions (third installment of matrix)*****




In a way, neo didnt die, he was the sixth remade program of "the one".  The matrix means (i think in latin) "the womb."

The first movie, was supposed to resemble birth (where neo first finds out he has powers)
the second movie, to resemble life (where he kicks a lot of 8ss and uses a lot of his powers)
the third movie, to resemble death and rebirth (where he starts to slack, and after he dies, he is supposedly going to be remade in the future, when the architect takes over again, in which case the next Neo will be the seventh installment of the neo program.  In other words, the matrix is never ending and it keeps repeating itself.
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Ocarina Blue on November 06, 2003, 08:18:00 PM
Your right, Swordplay, and Matrix also means lots other things aswell. Like something that will recreate itself, something that flesh and bone are incased in, a mold, and also its the name for a method of sending more than one electronic signal at once. I haven't seen the last two movies, but from what I've read, the name seems to suit the series pretty well
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: ThePerm on November 07, 2003, 08:32:15 AM
what you all fail to realise is that the humans are no longer produced by sex but by rather a form of cloning. In this sense neo could appear a few times every few generations
because their going to constantly recreate him and his line of genes in the same environment will have similar results...not necassarilly the same results...but for every choice he makes there is another set of choices...it is possible that the computers(oracle) calculated every choice he could possibly make based on the environment presented(to a point..outside the matrix such a control is harder....as it is random on how the non clones will reproduce and how their children will affect neo) and how the first and second neo's made choices similarly...also there were probably other trinities and morpheus'. Also the program Smith threw things off heavily for the sixth neo. Aw reminds me of Zelda.....
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 07, 2003, 10:57:19 AM
SPOILERS!!!      SPOILERS!!!       SPOILERS!!!








Did anyone feel there was a purpose for Neo to be blinded?
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Oldskool on November 07, 2003, 11:11:18 AM
I came out of the cinema after seeing Revolutions about an hour and a half ago. I thought it was exellent, not as good as the first but better than the second.

UBER SPOLIERS FROM HECK BELOW:



I was actually suprised by some of the parts of the movie, like Neo being blinded but getting the "second sight", and the fact that both Trinity and Neo snuffed it. (I am damn sure Neo died)

Pay close attention to the scene near the end where the little girl created that lovely sunrise, saying she did it for Neo. Neo means new, and a sunrise indicates a new day... hmm....  
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Oldskool on November 07, 2003, 11:28:32 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Swordsplay
***WARNING!***Will contain a spoler to the Revolutions (third installment of matrix)*****




In a way, neo didnt die, he was the sixth remade program of "the one".  The matrix means (i think in latin) "the womb."

The first movie, was supposed to resemble birth (where neo first finds out he has powers)
the second movie, to resemble life (where he kicks a lot of 8ss and uses a lot of his powers)
the third movie, to resemble death and rebirth (where he starts to slack, and after he dies, he is supposedly going to be remade in the future, when the architect takes over again, in which case the next Neo will be the seventh installment of the neo program.  In other words, the matrix is never ending and it keeps repeating itself.


I disagree that there will be another Neo. The 5 Neos beforehand had chosen to let the machines destroy Zion, and then choose to rebuild it with 11 men and 9 women (the KFC man... I mean the architect gave a number close to that) and all that stuff. The 6th Neo chose the other path, and (!!!Spoilers!!!) the war ended with peace on both sides.

Some extra spoilers: Also, the architect tells the oracle that he would free all the humans from the matrix. It would be more likely that the Machine's empire-like thingy falls apart to lack of power, as they would probably not be able to reclone humans fast enough before they run out of juice.

One more thing... I was wondering what "the machines" were doing with Neo's body in the end. They put it on a moving platform, but thats all we see... anyone got any clues as to what they were doing?
 
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: thesos21 on November 07, 2003, 11:39:41 AM
Were the 5 previous versions of the one all Mr. Anderson or is a different person chosen each time to fulfill the role as the one?
Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 07, 2003, 08:49:57 PM
all the same, I think.
Because the Architect said the the role of the one was to make a new Matrix, and choose some people to come along.
HE probbaly dies from something (Morpheus: When the Matrix was first built there was a man born inside...after he died, the Orcale prophesized his return), then they find his reincarnation in the Matrix again.
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: DarkRockerX on November 08, 2003, 08:27:23 AM

Neo did die, like evryone has said, there is no reason for him to live, he did his job. Trinity's dead, end of story. That was the Matrix at the end of the film. The Oracle and The Creator dude are just programs.  Programs which has no use, are deleted, or erased. That french bastard's name is Merovigan, for those who didn't remember. The fighting scenes were unbelievable..a great movie indeed.

One more thing, that spike headed machine is the real creator and command of the Matrix and the real world. As you can see, those octopus things obey the big machine, that creator is just ONE of that huge machine's programs. That big machine could not beat Smith, so he made a deal with Neo that he would save Zion if Neo beat Smith. Smith is a virus in the matrix, which is why he could duplicate himself. He is Neo's negative, Neo is positive, thats why both died.

If Matrix means "birth" in Latin, than there is a "new Birth" of the one every century.

Title: RE: The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Termin8Anakin on November 09, 2003, 03:19:29 AM
yeah, i get the whole movie now. thanks to ninja and a second viewing of the movie - saw it again saturday night . Anyway, Smith and Neo were opposites, so when Smith took over Neo, they cancelled each other out. Simple Algebra (eg -1+1 = 0: Smith + Neo = Nothing).
The new 'Matrix' is just the old one, but that anyone who wants to leave it (be freed and live in Zion) now has the freedom to do so. Like morpheus said in Matrix 1, there are some that are so dependant on the Matrix, and they never free a mind after a certain age, cause it had trouble letting go.
I also liked that little deja vu cat at the end of the movie, when the Matrix changes back to 'normal' - a nice touch.


EDIT: Whoops, forgot to close the spoiler tags
Title: RE:The Matrix Revolutions
Post by: Hostile Creation on November 09, 2003, 04:40:40 AM
Very good movie.  Seen it, agree with what all folk have said.

Oldskool, for that part I just think that it was a funeral barge or something, like heroes of old used to have.[\spoiler]