When asked if the Wii would be made 3D compatible, he responded that it really isn't possible with Wii hardware. "If you display a 3D image, the image quality becomes extremely bad, so we'd probably do it with the next system. We're thinking that the timing should be once the 3D television adoption rate crosses the 30% mark. We're looking at the adoption trends."
The newspaper asked if the 3DS represented Nintendo riding the wave of the 3D boom that seems to have invaded video gaming as of late. Iwata was quick to point out that Nintendo is not new to 3D, and that they had already been experimenting with immersive 3D gameplay fifteen years ago with their Virtual Boy system. Admitting that the technology "was not ready" at that time, he stated that his company put 3D gaming on the back burner until approximately two years ago, when they realized that they finally had the technology to create "a satisfying product".
Iwata said that the goal of implementing 3D is to give players the ability to sense their position in a game more easily. "In a game where the stages extend into the screen, it's surprisingly easier to control [compared to non-3D]. This is functionality for making games more pleasant to play, not just for show," he explained.
He was also bullish on the future of 3D gaming, calling it "the mainstream of [future] gaming".
Nintendo can't make a big deal about doing 3D without glasses on the 3DS and then go backwards by using glasses-based 3D on a console. They'll wait until they can do it without glasses on the console, and that's fine, because 3D TVs won't be anything more than a small niche market until they don't need glasses anymore anyway.But glasses-free TVs are at least 15 years away I think. Being able to show that 3D effect to multiple people is something even the 3DS cannot do right now. So according to you, 3D gaming won't take off until 2-3 generations from now.
No, 3D gaming is going to take off next year. 3D gaming on consoles, however, isn't going to really take off until a significant number of people own 3D TVs, and those aren't going to be that popular if you need glasses to do it, especially when those glasses cost $150 a pair.I'm confused because the PS3 is a console and it will have 3D gaming this year, but because it's a console, 3D gaming on the PS3 won't take off next year?
By "take off" I mean become mainstream popular. I highly doubt the 3D features of the PS3 will be used by that many people. Consoles will be capable of 3D, but it will be a niche market.So where is the 3D gaming going to become mainstream popular then? On the PC you will still need to have a newer nVidia care and have a motherboard and processor that can handle those games plus have the monitor that can do 3D as well.
By "take off" I mean become mainstream popular. I highly doubt the 3D features of the PS3 will be used by that many people. Consoles will be capable of 3D, but it will be a niche market.So where is the 3D gaming going to become mainstream popular then? On the PC you will still need to have a newer nVidia care and have a motherboard and processor that can handle those games plus have the monitor that can do 3D as well.
I don't know if you've been following E3, but Nintendo announced a new handheld system that does 3D gaming that I expect will be at least moderately successful.
Ah, well, you got me there. But I was already agreeing with you. I think we were crossing wires on what this conversation was about, since this wasn't a topic about the 3DS. I was talking about on the tv on computer monitor.By "take off" I mean become mainstream popular. I highly doubt the 3D features of the PS3 will be used by that many people. Consoles will be capable of 3D, but it will be a niche market.So where is the 3D gaming going to become mainstream popular then? On the PC you will still need to have a newer nVidia care and have a motherboard and processor that can handle those games plus have the monitor that can do 3D as well.
I don't know if you've been following E3, but Nintendo announced a new handheld system that does 3D gaming that I expect will be at least moderately successful.
Yeah, that was the main point; you quoted my argument as being that 3D wouldn't catch on for a while, and I said that to point out that I thought the exception to that was the 3DS, but I may have been too subtle about that. My mistake.Yeah, I didn't get it. Others may have though so I may have just been the nitwit here. :)
Should my next TV be 3D?That's what all the tv manufacturers want your next tv to be. :)
But if they're going to wait until 3D TVs have a 30% adoption rate well what timeframe are we talking about? Three years? Five years?
They already have viable options to make 3D TVs without glasses. I saw a tech demo where they placed a clear screen over a 3D TV and it made it viewable in 3D. They can currently make it viewable from 8 different angles and they expect to get it up to 64 angles in the next year.It's similar to what M$ has just bought up. Everyone is trying to make 3D without glasses. Nintendo was first to implement it in a consumer product. My guess is it'll still take 15 years to get it into tvs and then into homes.
The Wii and the GC are ALREADY 3D capable (from the mouth of Iwata himself). So why would it seem like a stretch that the Wii2 would be 3D capable too?He also said no to the Wii doing it because the games would look like utter crap, even for an SD game.
Doesn't mean it will be 3D focused, or that 3D will be the main feature, just means that the system will be capable of outputting 3D graphics should the need or desire arise. No different than the Gamcube and the Wii.
Yeah, I saw that and commented in the other thread (that I saw first), but I don't understand the questioning of the next Nintendo console being 3D capable when the last 2 were and that feature was just never utilized or activated and probably not even known about to most until very recently.The Wii and the GC are ALREADY 3D capable (from the mouth of Iwata himself). So why would it seem like a stretch that the Wii2 would be 3D capable too?He also said no to the Wii doing it because the games would look like utter crap, even for an SD game.
Doesn't mean it will be 3D focused, or that 3D will be the main feature, just means that the system will be capable of outputting 3D graphics should the need or desire arise. No different than the Gamcube and the Wii.
They will probably go the same route with the N6. Have the ability locked away dormant somewhere just in case, but focus on the HD side of things.Yeah, they'll hide it away until 3D tvs reach 30% market penetration. :)
Iwata also announced Nintendo's plans to make the successor to the Wii 3D compatible, telling Nikkei that "a full-scale entry into this field will take some time because 3D televisions will not catch on right away."
we've gone from "may" be to "will" be in a matter of a week
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6266844.html (http://www.gamespot.com/news/6266844.html)QuoteIwata also announced Nintendo's plans to make the successor to the Wii 3D compatible, telling Nikkei that "a full-scale entry into this field will take some time because 3D televisions will not catch on right away."