Community Forums => I'M BACK => Topic started by: Svevan on February 26, 2008, 06:02:04 AM
Title: NAFTA
Post by: Svevan on February 26, 2008, 06:02:04 AM
ummmm....I know politics are against the rules but can anyone point me in the right direction on this? I'm thinking Shy, Ty, and everyone else on here that loves NAFTA
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: that Baby guy on February 26, 2008, 06:04:40 AM
I think what happened is that NAFTA was originally thought to make it easier for North American countries to export their goods with lower tariffs, but instead, it allowed big businesses a chance to export machine-manufactured goods, and rather than increasing jobs, it just increased profits.
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: Nick DiMola on February 26, 2008, 09:58:37 AM
What about NAMBLA?
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: DAaaMan64 on February 26, 2008, 09:59:53 AM
Oh sure NOW everyone starts realizing NAFTA SUCKS
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: Pale on February 26, 2008, 10:28:04 AM
That's because their favorite politicians started complaining about it.
;)
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: DAaaMan64 on February 26, 2008, 10:31:36 AM
I know Pale, I know. But if that's what it takes okay.
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: ShyGuy on February 26, 2008, 12:05:35 PM
Who said I was in favor of NAFTA?
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: that Baby guy on February 26, 2008, 12:06:54 PM
Who said you weren't? You're either with NAFTA or against NAFTA, you can't be both and you can't be either.
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: ShyGuy on February 26, 2008, 12:42:06 PM
I like the AFT in NAFTA the N and the A are points of contention. Now take another T and what do you get? TAFT. Taft was of course our heaviest president. I think that explains it all right there.
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: that Baby guy on February 26, 2008, 12:42:48 PM
That's what she said.
Title: Re: NAFTA
Post by: nitsu niflheim on February 26, 2008, 01:09:56 PM
