Post by: Mashiro on October 21, 2007, 05:09:49 AM
Quote
Nihon Bussan announced Crazy Climber Wii for Wii, a remake of the classic arcade action game from 1980, in which you climb to the top of the building with two levers, while avoiding obstacles falling from the top.
The Wii remake will be in full 3D, you use the Wii Remote and Nunchuk to climb the building. Up to 4 players can play the game simultaneously. Crazy Climber Wii will be released in Japan on December 20, for 6090 yen.
Look at these beautiful screenshots!
Now . . . I'm sorry but you would think a game that is based around being on a wall 99% of the time would have some decent textures or something. For christ sake this is probably the laziest game ever developed for wii.
Yes, even lazier than Crusin'.
Post by: BranDonk Kong on October 21, 2007, 05:46:08 AM
Post by: NWR_pap64 on October 21, 2007, 06:54:23 AM
And yeah, this game looks REALLY bad...
Post by: Arbok on October 21, 2007, 09:01:25 AM
Post by: Nemo on October 21, 2007, 09:16:20 AM
Post by: Crimm on October 21, 2007, 09:19:25 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: Nemo
Calling that Dreamcast graphics would be an insult to the Dreamcast.
Why not? N64 kits are.
Post by: NuclearSpeed on October 21, 2007, 07:57:42 PM
Post by: SixthAngel on October 21, 2007, 08:46:02 PM
Post by: Maverick on October 21, 2007, 08:55:59 PM
Post by: AzureNightmare on October 21, 2007, 09:07:54 PM
Post by: Infernal Monkey on October 21, 2007, 10:12:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: NuclearSpeed
this game looked better when it was called Spider-Man for the Atari
And Spider-Man for the Atari looked better when it was called Crazy Climber!
I think it's pretty cool they're reviving this, even if the graphics are an upsized deluxe combo meal of lazy!
Post by: KDR_11k on October 22, 2007, 06:42:04 AM
Post by: Ian Sane on October 22, 2007, 07:06:58 AM
I've never played Crazy Climber but the concept sounds cool. This probably could be decent but the graphics look so bad that it doesn't look like much effort is being put it. Seems unfair to judge but those shots just look dull. There's a real lack of stuff happening. So why should I assume the gameplay is any good when the game looks boring?
The Atari version doesn't have much going on but it's an ATARI GAME. By Atari standards it looks pretty neat. I mean the guy's sprite is two colours and everything! I'm sure if this was a Saturn launch title I would be somewhat impressive as well but it isn't 1995.
Post by: couchmonkey on October 22, 2007, 08:02:31 AM
Post by: Terranigma Freak on October 22, 2007, 09:35:27 AM
